Stress sandwich beam

In these composites, the layers are bonded together. A sandwich panel beam is symmetrical if the skins have equal thickness, and are made of the same material. The neutral surface is at the mid-thickness, so the analysis of Appendix C can be used. Figure 4.6 shows the stress variation through a sandwich beam, calculated using Eq. (C.4) separately for the skins with high Young s modulus E, and the core with low modulus Eq. 

As mentioned in Section 3.8, use can be made of composite beams. In a sandwich beam, such as that shown in Fig. 3.26, the core usually has lower values of Young s and shear modulus than the thin faces. The Young s modulus of the faces and core will be denoted by and E, respectively. One approach to stress analysis in these sandwich beams, is to transform the cross-section into a geometry with an equivalent flexural rigidity but consisting of a single material. This transformation is shown in Fig. 4.10 in which the core is replaced by the same material as the faceplates but with a width bE IE ). In sandwich beams, the faces are usually much thinner than the cores and the equivalent flexural rigidity can be written approximately as... 

Figure 4.19 Residual stresses can arise in a sandwich beam, if the thermal expansion coefficient of the faces is different from that of the core.

FIGURE 9.6 Bending of a sandwich beam, (a) Geometry, (b) strain distribution, and (c) stress distribution. 

Apart from the short beam shear test, which measures the interlaminar shear properties, many different specimen geometry and loading configurations are available in the literature for the translaminar or in-plane strength measurements. These include the losipescu shear test, the 45°]5 tensile test, the [10°] off-axis tensile test, the rail-shear tests, the cross-beam sandwich test and the thin-walled tube torsion test. Since the state of shear stress in the test areas of the specimens is seldom pure or uniform in most of these techniques, the results obtained are likely to be inconsistent. In addition to the above shear tests, the transverse tension test is another simple popular method to assess the bond quality of bulk composites. Some of these methods are more widely used than others due to their simplicity in specimen preparation and data reduction methodology. 

The classical experimental setup developed for fe polarization reversal implies a singledomain fe sample sandwiched between two electrodes [28], While conventional domain inversion techniques use equal sized electrodes covering the polar faces of fe templates, nanodomain inversion occurs under totally different conditions when the bottom electrode is a uniform plate and the upper one is a point contact. Two different kinds of the upper switching mobile nanoelectrodes may be considered afm tip (and/or array of tips) and electron drop formed using electron beam exposure. When a voltage stress is applied to the nanoelectrode, both the electric field intensity and its spatial distribution strongly differ in fe thin films (thin fe crystals) and bulk fe crystals. 

ASTM D-1344 describes a cross-lap specimen of the type shown in Fig. 2d for determining tensile properties of adhesive bonds. Wood, glass, sandwich, and honeycomb materials have been tested as samples in this general configuration. Even under the best of circumstances, one would not anticipate the stress distribution in such a case to be very uniform. The exact stress distribution is highly dependent on the relative flexibilities of both the cross beams and the adhesive. Certainly, caution must be exercised when comparing tensile strength from this test with data obtained from other tensile tests. Probably for these reasons, this test is scheduled by ASTM for discontinuation. 

The deflection of a beam as computed by the ordinary formulas is that due to flexural stresses only. The deflection in honeycomb (Chapter 7 Sandwiches) and short beams due to vertical shear can be high, and should always be checked. Because of the nonuniform distribution of the shear over the cross section of the beam, computing the deflection due to shear by exact methods is difficult. It may be approximated by ... 

This problem is based on the use of a chair seat which is supported as a cantilever beam at the rear. The person load is assumed to be central on the seat and the controlling requirement is that the sag of the seat not exceed 2 in. for the life of the chair which is assumed to be 4 years. The components of the deflection are the stress induced deflection from the load plus the creep caused by the fact that the seat does not completely recover between applications of the stress. The assumed cycle of use is 4 hr on 1 hr off 4 hr on 15 hr off and this cycle is repeated daily. Two different seat constructions are examined. One is a glass-filled polypropylene molded section and the other is a foam core sandwich panel. In each case the solutions are not intended to be exact since many of the data are not available but as an indication of the effects of the main variables on the design and as a starting point for a design that will probably work. 

COSMOSIM (Structural Research Analysis Corp., Santa Monica, CA) Provides finite element analysis with capabilities in interfaces that are for structural (static, dynamic, etc.), nonlinear (plasticity, friction, damping, etc.), materials (isotropic, orthotropic, etc.), elements (3-D beams, sandwich shells, springs, etc.), heat transfer (steady state, convection, etc.), design optimization (miniweight, stress constraints, etc.), and CAD interfaces and others. 

In all materials (plastics, metals, wood, etc.) elementary mechanical theory demonstrates that some shapes resist deformation from external loads. This phenomenon stems from the basic physical fact that deformation in beam or sheet sections depends upon the mathematical product of the modulus of elasticity (E) and the moment of inertia (I), commonly expressed as El (Chapter 3, Stress-strain behavior). It is applied to all types of constructions such as solids, foams, and sandwich structures. In many applications plastics can lend themselves in the form of a sophisticated lightweight stiff structure and the requirements are such that the structure must be of plastics. In other instances, the economics of fabrication and erection of a plastics lightweight structure and the intrinsic appearance and other desirable properties make it preferable to other materials. 

Beam Shear. Here the bondline in a thick-skinned honeycomb sandwich panel is subjected to shear stresses utilising 3- or 4-point loading (Fig. 51). 

Honeycomb Flatwise Tensile 50 X 50 mm specimens are cut from similar sandwich panels as are prepared for the beam shear test. These are then bonded to rigid blocks, generally using a paste adhesive having a cure temperature at ambient or, at least, lower than that used to cure the adhesive under test. The whole is then loaded in such a manner as to subject the bond between honeycomb and skin to tensile stresses (Fig. 52). 

The main structural component of the SR.N4 (British Hovercraft Corporation) according to Powis (1973) is a large sandwich panel 40 m long, 23 m wide and about 1 m thick. The top and bottom skins of this sandwich panel are made of 2 5 mx 1 25 mx 37 mm sandwich panels which are bolted to an egg-box structure made from aluminium shear web with bonded stiffeners. The skin panels are of 6 4 mm and 3 2 mm cell aluminium honeycomb made from foil 0-05-0-076 mm thick. The higher density core is used in the more highly stressed areas. The superstructure of the craft is composed of two vertical beams running fore and aft, which are fabricated from this aluminium sheet with bonded stiffeners. The roof is one unsupported span between... 

---