Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Stochastic rules

Let us first of all consider the deterministic Life rule, or zero temperature limit of our more general stochastic rule. Using the density p to represent our state of knowledge of the system at time t, our problem is then to estimate the time-evolution of p for T = 0. [Pg.364]

T for the Hopfield net and replacing the deterministic threshold dynamics with a stochastic rule [hinton83] ... [Pg.529]

The main diflierence between looking at stochastic nets rather than their deterministic counterparts is stochastic nets force us to shift our focus of attention since under a stochastic rule the same initial states generally evolve into diflierent final states, we are in the stochastic case not so much interested in the final state of the... [Pg.529]

Here va and va are the stoichiometric coefficients for the reaction. The formulation is easily extended to treat a set of coupled chemical reactions. Reactive MPC dynamics again consists of free streaming and collisions, which take place at discrete times x. We partition the system into cells in order to carry out the reactive multiparticle collisions. The partition of the multicomponent system into collision cells is shown schematically in Fig. 7. In each cell, independently of the other cells, reactive and nonreactive collisions occur at times x. The nonreactive collisions can be carried out as described earlier for multi-component systems. The reactive collisions occur by birth-death stochastic rules. Such rules can be constructed to conserve mass, momentum, and energy. This is especially useful for coupling reactions to fluid flow. The reactive collision model can also be applied to far-from-equilibrium situations, where certain species are held fixed by constraints. In this case conservation laws... [Pg.109]

The synthesis of biopolymers in vivo leads to macromolecules with a defined sequence of units. This effect is very important for living organisms and is different in comparison with random copolymerization in which sequences of units are distributed according to stochastic rules. On the other hand, the predicted sequence of units can be achieved by a set of successive reactions of respective monomer molecule addition. In template copolymerization, the interaction between comonomers and the template could pre-arrange monomer units defining sequence distribution in the macromolecular product. [Pg.12]

From the present state of the system (denoted by the symbol o, a trial move is attempted to a trial state n. In the Metropolis scheme, the (stochastic) rule for the generation of these trial moves is such that the probability Oon to attempt a trial move to n, given that the system is initially in o, is equal to the probability a o to generate a trial move to o, given that the system is initially in n. [Pg.130]

In order to construct mesoscopic models, we again begin by partitioning the system into cells located at the nodes of a regular lattice, but now the cells are assumed to contain some small number of molecules. We cannot use a continuum description of the dynamics in a cell as we did for the reaction-diffusion equation. Instead, we describe the reactions and motions of molecules using stochastic rules that mimic the dynamics of these processes on meso-scales. The stochastic element arises because we do not take into account the detailed motions of all solvent species or the dynamics on microscopic scales. Nevertheless, because the number of molecules in a cell may be small, we must account for the fact that this number can change by random reactive events and random motions of molecules that take them into and out of a... [Pg.237]

The central step in RG is the selection of a specific polymer trial conformation from an entire tree of possible conformations. The essential difference between the continuous-potential RG method and the earlier schemes is that the selection of the trial conformation involves two stochastic steps the first is the selection of a subset of open branches on the tree, the second is the selection of the trial conformation among the open branches. The crucial new concept in RG is that trial directions can be either open or closed. A trial direction that is closed will never be chosen as a part of the chain. For hard-core potentials, a trial direction is closed if it leads to a configuration that has at least one hard-core overlap - otherwise it is open. Therefore, the selection of the open trial directions is deterministic rather than stochastic. In contrast, for continuous potentials, we use a stochastic rule to decide whether a trial direction is open or closed. The probability that direction i is open depends on its energy ui, hence p = p (rq). It is important to note that, in principle, this stochastic rule is quite arbitrary, the only restriction is 0 < Pi < 1 (for hard-core potentials 0 < pt < 1). However, it is useful to apply the following restrictions [112]... [Pg.26]

If we choose equation 3.2 as our stochastic rule, there is complete cancellation of Boltzmann factors associated with the selected trial segments (i) as long as Ui > 0. For hard-core interactions Pt = 1, in which case the algorithm reduces to the RG algorithm for hard-core potentials [111]. [Pg.29]

In summary, we have extended the recoil growth scheme for systems with continuous potentials. We find that in a NVT simulation RG is much more efficient thcin CBMC for long chains and high densities. However, in appendix B we have shown that RG is less suitable for parallelization using the parallel algorithm of section 2.3. We found that the standard Metropolis acceptance/rejection rule is a reasonable stochastic rule when a Lennard-Jones potential is used. [Pg.34]

Standard procedures that are used for testing of construction materials are based on square pulse actions or their various combinations. For example, small cyclic loads are used for forecast of durability and failure of materials. It is possible to apply analytical description of various types of loads as IN actions in time and frequency domains and use them as analytical deterministic models. Noise N(t) action as a rule is represented by stochastic model. [Pg.189]

Chapter 7 discusses a variety of topics all of which are related to the class of probabilistic CA (PCA) i.e. CA that involve some elements of probability in their state and/or time-evolution. The chapter begins with a physicist s overview of critical phenomena. Later sections include discussions of the equivalence between PCA and spin models, the critical behavior of PCA, mean-field theory, CA simulation of conventional spin models and a stochastic version of Conway s Life rule. [Pg.19]

Fig. 3.16 Space-time pattern of fc — 2, r — 1 rule R18 kink-nites (i.e.. neighboring a = 1 site.s) are indicated in solid black. Notice the stochastic-like kink trajectories, despite the strictly deterministic rule. Fig. 3.16 Space-time pattern of fc — 2, r — 1 rule R18 kink-nites (i.e.. neighboring a = 1 site.s) are indicated in solid black. Notice the stochastic-like kink trajectories, despite the strictly deterministic rule.
An early study of a stochastic CA system was performed by Schulman and Seiden in 1978 using a generalized version of Conway s Life rule [schul78]. Though there was little follow-on effort stemming directly from this particular paper, the study nonetheless serves as a useful prototype for later analyses. The manner in which Schulman and Seiden incorporate site-site correlations into their calculations, for example, bears some resemblance to Gutowitz, et.ai. s Local Structure Theory, developed about a decade later (see section 5.3). In this section, we outline some of their methodology and results. [Pg.363]

The Boltzman Machine generalizes the Hopfield model in two ways (1) like the simple stochastic variant discussed above, it t(>o substitutes a stochastic update rule for Hopfield s deterministic dynamics, and (2) it separates the neurons in the net into sets of visible and hidden units. Figure 10.8 shows a Boltzman Machine in which the visible neurons have been further subdividetl into input and output sets. [Pg.532]

The complete specification of a random process requires us to have some way of writing down an infinite number of distribution functions. For practical reasons, this is an impossible task unless all the distribution functions can be specified by means of a rule that enables one to calculate any distribution function of interest in terms of a finite amount of prespecified information. The following examples will illustrate these ideas by showing howr some particular stochastic processes of interest can be defined. [Pg.162]

This results in sensible numbers for the class boundaries and allows for comparisons with other series of observations that have different extrema, for example (.375,. 892) or (.25, 1.11). Strict adherence to the theory-inspired rule would have yielded class boundaries. 327,. 4833,. 6395,. 7958, and. 952, with the extreme values being exactly on the edges of the graph. That this is impractical is obvious, mainly because the class boundaries depend on the stochastic element innate in Xmin resp. x ax- Program HISTO, option (Scale), allows for an independent setting of a subdivided range R with C bins of width R/C, and lower/upper limits on the graph. [Pg.75]

The multiparticle collision rule was first introduced in the context of a lattice model with a stochastic streaming rule in Ref. 12. [Pg.92]

The state of every cell is updated once each cycle, according to transition rules, which take into account the cell s current state and the state of cells in the neighborhood. Transition rules may be deterministic, so that the next state of a cell is determined unambiguously by the current state of the CA, or partly or wholly stochastic. [Pg.179]

When such a transition rule is applied, the state of each cell and, therefore, of the entire system varies completely unpredictably from one cycle to the next (Figure 6.9), which is unlikely to be of much scientific interest. No information is stored in the model about the values of the random numbers used to determine the next state of a cell, thus once a new pattern has been created using this rule there is no turning back All knowledge of what has gone before has been destroyed. This irreversibility, when it is impossible to determine what the states of the CA were in the last cycle by inspecting the current state of all cells, is a common feature if the transition rules are partly stochastic. It also arises when deterministic rules are used if two different starting patterns can create the same pattern in the next cycle. [Pg.183]

Probabilistic rules can be introduced into the CA in several ways. In "the speed of light," a rule that contains a random element leads to the propagation of a wavefront. When updating each cell, we could make a random choice between several different rules to introduce stochastic behavior, but we could also determine the future state of the cell by reference not to the... [Pg.184]


See other pages where Stochastic rules is mentioned: [Pg.532]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.532]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.485]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.532]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.25]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.221 , Pg.237 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info