Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Static noise measurement

Most particles suspended in air carry an electric charge, particularly if they have passed through a highly turbulent process. A probe inserted into the stream will detect this charge as an AC voltage that is strongly [Pg.525]


Advantages. The experiment can be carried out with a conventional fast-spuming MAS probe so that it is straightforward to implement. For recording the satellite transition lineshapes it offers better signal-to-noise and is less susceptible to deadtime effects than static measurements. As the effects differ for each value, a single satellite transition experiment is effectively the same as carrying out multiple field experiments on the central transition. [Pg.1485]

The main error sources are noise in the wavefront sensor measurement, imperfect wavefront correction due to the finite number of actuators and bandwidth error due to the finite time required to measure and correct the wavefront error. Other errors include errors in the telescope optics which are not corrected by the AO system (e.g. high frequency vibrations, high spatial frequency errors), scintillation and non-common path errors. The latter are wavefront errors introduced in the corrected beam after light has been extracted to the wavefront sensor. Since the wavefront sensor does not sense these errors they will not be corrected. Since the non-common path errors are usually static, they can be measured off-line and taken into account in the wavefront correction. [Pg.195]

Both of the control schemes for the neutralizer took measurements on the major varying streams before they were diluted in the large blending tank. This is usually desirable because once the streams are mixed the measurable differences are smaller, and the possibility of noise (the equivalent of static in radio signals) affecting the measurement accuracy is greater. [Pg.172]

SWV experiments are usually performed on stationary solid electrodes or static merciuy drop electrodes. The response consists of discrete current-potential points separated by the potential increment AE [1,20-23]. Hence, AE determines the apparent scan rate, which is defined as AE/t, and the density of information in the response, which is a number of current-potential points within a certain potential range. The currents increase proportionally to the apparent scan rate. For better graphical presentation, the points can be interconnected, but the fine between two points has no physical significance, as there is no theoretical reason to interpolate any mathematical function between two experimentally determined current-potential points. The currents measured with smaller A are smaller than the values predicted by the interpolation between two points measured with bigger AE [3]. Frequently, the response is distorted by electronic noise and a smoothing procedure is necessary for its correct interpretation. In this case, it is better if AE is as small as possible. By smoothing, the set of discrete points is transformed into a continuous current-potential curve. Care should be taken that the smoothing procedttre does not distort the square-wave response. [Pg.7]

Calibration of FAGE1 from a static reactor (a Teflon film bag that collapses as sample is withdrawn) has been reported (78). In static decay, HO reacts with a tracer T that has a loss that can be measured by an independent technique T necessarily has no sinks other than HO reaction (see Table I) and no sources within the reactor. From equation 17, the instantaneous HO concentration is calculated from the instantaneous slope of a plot of ln[T] versus time. The presence of other reagents may be necessary to ensure sufficient HO however, the mechanisms by which HO is generated and lost are of no concern, because the loss of the tracer by reaction with whatever HO is present is what is observed. Turbulent transport must keep the reactor s contents well mixed so that the analytically measured HO concentration is representative of the volume-averaged HO concentration reflected by the tracer consumption. If the HO concentration is constant, the random error in [HO] calculated from the tracer decay slope can be obtained from the slope uncertainty of a least squares fit. Systematic error would arise from uncertainties in the rate constant for the T + HO reaction, but several tracers may be employed concurrently. In general, HO may be nonconstant in the reactor, so its concentration variation must be separated from noise associated with the [T] measurement, which must therefore be determined separately. [Pg.374]

SFM s can be also classified according to static and dynamic operating modes. Under quasi-static conditions, the microscope measures the instantaneous response of the cantilever when it interacts with the sample. Dynamic SFM enables separation of the elastic and inelastic component in the cantilever deflection when the sample surface is exposed to a periodically varying stress field. The dynamic modes are useful for investigation of viscoelastic materials such as polymers and results in additional improvements in the signal-to-noise ratio. [Pg.73]

Figure 49. Susceptibility spectra for propylene carbonate (Tg — 160 K) as measured by depolarized light scattering (top, data from Ref. 372) and dielectric spectroscopy (bottom, data from Ref. 9), each normalized by a temperature-independent static susceptibility. The full lines are fits from solutions of a two-component schematic MCT model. The dashed fines indicate a white noise spectrum. The dash—dotted line in the upper panel exhibits the asymptote of the critical spectrum. The dotted line shows the solution of the model at T — Tc with hopping terms being neglected. (From Ref. 380.)... Figure 49. Susceptibility spectra for propylene carbonate (Tg — 160 K) as measured by depolarized light scattering (top, data from Ref. 372) and dielectric spectroscopy (bottom, data from Ref. 9), each normalized by a temperature-independent static susceptibility. The full lines are fits from solutions of a two-component schematic MCT model. The dashed fines indicate a white noise spectrum. The dash—dotted line in the upper panel exhibits the asymptote of the critical spectrum. The dotted line shows the solution of the model at T — Tc with hopping terms being neglected. (From Ref. 380.)...
The noise level of detectors that are particularly susceptible to variations in column pressure or flow rate (e.g. the katherometer and the refractive index detector) are often measured under static conditions (i.e. no flow of mobile phase). Such specifications are not really useful, as the analyst can never use the detector without a column flow. It could be argued that the manufacturer of the detector should not be held responsible for the precise control of the mobile phase, beitmay a gas flow controller or a solvent pump. However, all mobile phase delivery systems show some variation in flow rates (and consequently pressure) and it is the responsibility of the detector manufacturer to design devices that are as insensitive to pressure and flow changes as possible. [Pg.35]

The form taken by each transient is the result of competition between the aligning field and the thermal opposition. The transient oscillations are not simple and are relatively long-lived in comparison with the rise time in the static field. The amplitude of the transient decreases (as mentioned already) as the field frequency increases, but even at w =10 rad/s a long-hved response is measurable above the noise of the computer simulation. [Pg.202]


See other pages where Static noise measurement is mentioned: [Pg.525]    [Pg.525]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.1961]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.587]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.382]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.2579]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.329]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.431]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.681]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.141]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.525 ]




SEARCH



Noise measurement

Noise measuring

Static measurement

© 2024 chempedia.info