Standard Screen Scales

Sieve Designation Sieve Opening Wire Diameter Tyler Equivalent Designation 

US Sieve Series and Tyler Equivalents (ASTM Standards) 

Nominal Aperture Size (mm) Nominal Wire Diameter (mm) Nearest Mesh Number 

---

Tyler Standard Screen Scale Sieve Series. 

Where a closer sizing is required Column 5 shows the Tyler Standard Screen Scale with intermediate sieves. In this series the sieve openings increase in the ratio of the fourth root of 2 or 1.189. 

U. S. Sieve Series—A series of sieves, differing but slightly from the Tyler Standard Screen Scale, was proposed in 1919 by the National Bureau of Standards. This has been called the U. S. Sieve Series and in general the sizes advance in the same ratio as the Tyler Screen Scale, but a 1-mm opening is used as a base rather than the opening for the 200-mesh cloth in the Tyler series. There appears to be no reason for preferring one type of series over the other. Table 12 shows the various characteristics of the U. S. Sieve Series adopted by the A.S.T.M. which may be contrasted, with those of the Tyler Screen Series given in Table 11. 

Equations 2.34 and 2.35 allow for transformations between mesh number and aperture size. Both features of sieves are listed in standard screen scales. Standardized sieve apertures were first proposed by Rittinger (1867). Modem standards are based on either a-Jl or progression. In the United States, the series of sieves with standard opening sizes are called "Tyler" sieves and the openings of successive sieves are based onayfz progression starting at 45 pm. 

Consulting the British Standards Screen Scale in Appendix 5, the nominal aperture sizes in micrometers are tabulated versus the weight retained. Then, the fractions retained on each of the sieves used in the test can be listed as percentage of the original test sample weight, and finally as the oversize cumulative percentages (i.e., running totals). The results of these calculations can be tabulated on a second table (Table 2.8). 

Consulting a Tyler Standard Screen Scale Table, it can be read the value of the screen equivalent diameter as 0.208 mm, so the pulverized coal may be considered a fine powder. Since the particles are taken as spherical, the ideal porosity =0.4 can be used for calculation. Finally, from any reference book (or appendix of some engineering textbook) listing physical properties of materials, at approximately 25°C the density of air is of the order of 1.2 kg/m. Substituting directly into Equation 7.5 ... 

Consulting the Tyler Standard Screen Scale in Appendix 5, a Table of equivalent sieve diameter as a function of cumulative frequency is derived. From such a table, a plot similar to the one derived in the previous example is obtained. The plot is shown in Figure 9.4, and values of Xq, Xp, and Xy, at the cut diameter of 7-mesh (2.794 mm from the Tyler Standard Screen Scale) are 0.68, 0.2, and 0, respectively. 

Tyler Standard Sieve Series Many users case their tests on Tyler standard testing sieves (Table 19-6). The only difference between the U.S. sieves and the Tyler screen scale sieves is the identification method. Tyler screen scale sieves are identified by nominal meshes per linear inch while the U.S. sieves are identified by millimeters or micrometers or by an arbitraiy number which does not necessarily mean the mesh count. The Tyler standard sieve scale series has... 

This screen scale has as its base an opening of 0.0029 in. which is the opening in 200-mesh 0.0021-in. wire, the standard sieve, as adopted by the Bureau of Standards of the United States Government, the openings increasing in the ratio of the square root of 2 or 1.414. 

Most synthetic resins are granular with a spherical diameter of 0.04-1.0 mm. In the United States, the particle sizes are listed according to standard screen sizes or mesh values. Table 8.2 shows a comparison of mesh sizes and metric sizes the most common size ranges used in large-scale applications are 20-50 and 50-100 mesh [4]. 

For the above scales, eye protection should be worn and work should be undertaken in a standard fume-cupboard behind a well-anchored polycarbonate screen. It is advisable to wear a protective apron and hand protection whether leather gauntlets or tongs should be used will be dictated by circumstances. Such measures are recommended but it should be ensured that they do not precipitate a hazard as a result of loss of tactile sensitivity (e.g. dropping a flask, overtightening clamps, exerting excessive pressure when assembling apparatus). The material of gloves needs consideration. (PVC but not rubber is suitable for tert-butyl peroxide.)... 

This is the gold standard of environmental impact assessments. It has been developed over more than 20 years, and is governed by international standards ISO 14040 and ISO 14044. The process is very detailed, and each LCA is a project in its own right. It is far too expensive and time-consuming for screening innovation ideas. It is most effectively used for large-scale policy questions, and for justifying specific environmental claims when a new product or service is launched. 

---