Standard deviation control values

Power functions for mean (or 2-test), range, and (or standard deviation) control procedures, when compared with those for previous control procedures, show higher probabilities for error detection, particularly at larger n s. The probability for false rejection can be set at a suitably low level by proper choice of control limits. Thus these control procedures appear to offer better performance characteristics than single-value control charts because they have higher error detection and lower false rejection as n increases. 

The principal tool for performance-based quality assessment is the control chart. In a control chart the results from the analysis of quality assessment samples are plotted in the order in which they are collected, providing a continuous record of the statistical state of the analytical system. Quality assessment data collected over time can be summarized by a mean value and a standard deviation. The fundamental assumption behind the use of a control chart is that quality assessment data will show only random variations around the mean value when the analytical system is in statistical control. When an analytical system moves out of statistical control, the quality assessment data is influenced by additional sources of error, increasing the standard deviation or changing the mean value. 

Control charts were originally developed in the 1920s as a quality assurance tool for the control of manufactured products.Two types of control charts are commonly used in quality assurance a property control chart in which results for single measurements, or the means for several replicate measurements, are plotted sequentially and a precision control chart in which ranges or standard deviations are plotted sequentially. In either case, the control chart consists of a line representing the mean value for the measured property or the precision, and two or more boundary lines whose positions are determined by the precision of the measurement process. The position of the data points about the boundary lines determines whether the system is in statistical control. 

Construction of Property Control Charts The simplest form for a property control chart is a sequence of points, each of which represents a single determination of the property being monitored. To construct the control chart, it is first necessary to determine the mean value of the property and the standard deviation for its measurement. These statistical values are determined using a minimum of 7 to 15 samples (although 30 or more samples are desirable), obtained while the system is known to be under statistical control. The center line (CL) of the control chart is determined by the average of these n points... 

The average value of the rephcates is reported along with the standard deviation, which reflects the variabihty in the measurement. Large standard deviations relative to the average measurement indicate the need for an action plan to improve measurement precision. This can be accomphshed through more rephcate measurements or the elimination of the source of variation, such as the imprecision of an instmment or poor temperature control during the measurement. 

Mcllvried and Massoth [484] applied essentially the same approach as Hutchinson et al. [483] to both the contracting volume and diffusion-controlled models with normal and log—normal particle size distributions. They produced generalized plots of a against reduced time r (defined by t = kt/p) for various values of the standard deviation of the distribution, a (log—normal distribution) or the dispersion ratio, a/p (normal distribution with mean particle radius, p). 

Metrics for this might include number of excursions from statistical process control, but one very useful metric for controllability is process capability, or more accurately, process capability indices. Process capability compares the output of an in-control process to the specification limits by using capability indices. The comparison is made by forming the ratio of the spread between the process specifications (the specification width ) to the spread of the process values. In a six-sigma environment, this is measured by six standard deviation units for the process (the process width ). A process under control is one where almost all the measurements fall inside the specification limits. The general formula for process capability index is ... 

Particularly for direct microanalytical techniques using <10 mg of sample for analysis, it is highly desirable to obtain quantitative information on element- and compound-specific homogeneity in the certificates for validation and quality control of measurements. As the mean concentration in a CRM is clearly material-related, the standard deviation of this mean value should represent the element s distribution in this matrix rather than differences in the analytical procedures used. 

Net recoveries of cyfluthrin from matrices fortified at 0.01-5.05 mg kg ranged from 77 to 119%. The limit of detection (LOD) is defined as the lowest concentration that can be determined to be statistically different from a blank or control. Calculate the value by taking the standard deviation of the residue values from the analysis of the recovery samples at the limit of quantification (LOQ) and using the equation... 

The Na -selective electrodes based on silicone-rubber membranes modified chemically by (8) and (9), were also investigated for Na assay in control serum and urine [22]. The found values for the Na concentrations in both of the serum and urine samples are in good agreement with their corresponding actual values with a relative standard deviation of about 1%. These results suggest that the Na -selective electrodes based on silicone-rubber membranes modified chemically by calix[4]arene neutral carrier (8) are reliable on assay in human body fluid. 

The family of curves obtained, and presented in Figure 43-6, show that, not surprisingly, the controlling parameter of the family of curves is the standard deviation of the noise the maximum value of the multiplication factor occurs at a given fraction of the standard deviation of the energy readings. Successive approximations show that the maximum multiplier of approximately 1.28 occurs when If is approximately 2.11 times sigma, the standard deviation of AEr. 

The analysis tool computes the arithmetic mean or the median of the pixel intensities for each spot in both color channels. Median intensities are less susceptible to extreme values, whereas variability of the data can be estimated from mean intensities. Local sampling of background or spots from only buffer (negative controls) can be used to establish a threshold which a true signal must exceed, e.g. two standard deviations above background. Raw intensities or background-substracted intensities may be used for further analysis. 

Concentratons of Sr in people living in New York City between 1953 and 1959 who were exposed to nuclear weapons fallout were reported by Kulp and Schulert (1962). They suggested that the distribution of observed values was well fit by a log-normal distribution that had a geometric standard deviation of about 1.7. The Federal Radiation Council (FRC, 1961), after review of the accumulated data on Sr in human bone, concluded that a log-normal distribution was the appropriate description of the distribution of this age-controlled, exposuretime controlled population. The main exposure to Sr from fallout was by way of ingestion. 

Krambeck et al. [40] measured small quantities of particulate carbon in lake waters by an automated furnace combustion infrared procedure. The whole sequence of operations was controlled with the aid of an AIM65 desktop computer. The system was successfully operated for routine analysis of samples of lake water with particulate organic carbon values of 100-300ug L 1 carbon a single analysis takes 8min. The relative standard deviation was about 1%. 

A given device, procedure, process, or method is usually said to be in statistical control if numerical values derived from it on a regular basis (such as daily) are consistently within 2 standard deviations from the established mean, or the most desirable value. As we learned in Section 1.7.3, such numerical values occur statistically 95.5% of the time. Thus if, say, two or more consecutive values differ from the established value by more than 2 standard deviations, a problem is indicated because this should happen only 4.5% of the time, or once in roughly every 20 events, and is not expected two or more times consecutively. The device, procedure, process, or method would be considered out of statistical control, indicating that an evaluation is in order. 

Analytical laboratories, especially quality assurance laboratories, will often maintain graphical records of statistical control so that scientists and technicians can note the history of the device, procedure, process, or method at a glance. The graphical record is called a control chart and is maintained on a regular basis, such as daily. It is a graph of the numerical value on the y-axis vs. the date on the x-axis. The chart is characterized by five horizontal lines designating the five numerical values that are important for statistical control. One is the value that is 3 standard deviations from the most desirable value on the positive side. Another is the value that is 3 standard deviations from the most desirable value on the negative side. These represent those values that are expected to occur only less than 0.3% of the time. These two numerical values are called the action limits because one point outside these limits is cause for action to be taken. 

A procedure or method maybe checked by the use of a quality control solution (often called a control), a solution that is known to have a concentration value that should match what the procedure or method would measure. The known numerical value is the desirable value in the control chart. The numerical value determined for the control by the procedure or method is charted. The warning and action limits are determined by preliminary work done a sufficient number of times so as to ascertain the population standard deviation. 

Here the concentration range of the analyte in the ran is relatively small, so a common value of standard deviation can be assumed. Insert a control material at least once per ran. Plot either the individual values obtained, or the mean value, on an appropriate control chart. Analyse in duplicate at least half of the test materials, selected at random. Insert at least one blank determination. 

Longer (e g. n > 20) frequent runs of similar materials Again a common level of standard deviation is assumed. Insert the control material at an approximate frequency of one per ten test materials. If the run size is likely to vary from run to run it is easier to standardise on a fixed number of insertions per run and plot the mean value on a control chart of means. Otherwise plot individual values. Analyse in duplicate a minimum of five test materials selected at random. Insert one blank determination per ten test materials. 

Here we cannot assume that a single value of standard deviation is applicable. Insert control materials in total numbers approximately as recommended above. However, there should be at least two levels of analyte represented, one close to the median level of typical test materials, and the other approximately at the upper or lower decile as appropriate. Enter values for the two control materials on separate control charts. Duplicate a minimum of five test materials, and insert one procedural blank per ten test materials. 

It is important to be able to assess the accuracy of a new or published structure from the relevant standard parameters (R value, estimated standard deviations). The review by Jones (1984) is a useful antidote to uncritical acceptance of published figures. Finally, all, or almost all, the bond lengths, angles and torsional angles in a structure will be normal. If the object of the exercise was to determine whether a particular structural feature is or is not normal, a comparison with appropriate controls will be necessary. For bond lengths a compendium of standard values is available (F. H. Allen et al., 1987). 

All measured values are normally registered by means of a recorder. In addition, an improved method for data collection and processing is possible today by use of a computer. This has the advantage of automatic, safer data collection in an easy-to-read form. Comparison with standard values, correction of the buoyancy effects, control of linearity, control of standard deviations and peak integrations are thus possible. 

A control sample is a sample for which the concentrations of the test analyte is known and which is treated in an identical manner to the test samples. It should ideally be of a similar overall composition to the test samples in order to show similar physical and analytical features. For instance, if serum samples are being analysed for their glucose content, the control sample should also be serum with a known concentration of glucose. A control sample will be one of many aliquots of a larger sample, stored under suitable conditions and for which the between batch mean and standard deviation of many replicates have been determined. It may be prepared within the laboratory or purchased from an external supplier. Although values are often stated for commercially available control samples, it is essential that the mean and standard deviation are determined from replicate analyses within each particular laboratory. 

In a quality assurance programme, the control with a mean value of 10.5 mg and a standard deviation of 0.1 mg was analysed with a batch of test samples and gave a result of 10.0 mg. Which of the following actions should be taken ... 

Each value is the mean of 3 - 5 replications. Values in parentheses are standard deviations. No dyes were detected in any control samples. 

---