Stake holder

The understanding of the role played by all stake-holders in the cleanup process, including scientists, economists, managers, regulators, public... 

The outcome of planning should include the generation of a method definition requirement document (MDRD) in which all stake holders agree, prior to method development, on the critical attributes of the method. Considerations such as what impurities/degradation products should be monitored, requisite reporting thresholds, the need for an MS-compatible method, if identical methods for DP and DS are required, etc., should be clearly decided and agreed upon by all stakeholders. 

Characteristic of several of the selection criteria is that they are reactive. The authority or the inspectors choose themes on the basis of information received from others. They do not analyse information they have collected independently. Tips from other authorities and reports in the media are examples of such criteria. Events and environmental problems in the media are often related to specific serious accidents. It is not unusual for the media itself to act reactively under pressure from stake-holders, interest groups, public authorities and private companies (Asp 1986). From the perspective of environmental efficiency, this kind of selection can be problematic, specifically when environmental problems of lesser importance are chosen for inspection. 

The IC must analyze the incident based on the facts and be prepared to change the response tactics and allocated resources as the situation reports mandate. The IC is a decision maker and a delegator. To be effective the IC must assign sector officer responsibilities to qualified staff, encourage ideas and opinions to be voiced through the command structure, insist on key stake-holder participation, seek the input of experts and practitioners alike, continually re-evaluate the tactics and strategy, and develop alternate plans. 

Supports easier, fact-based communication with share holders and stake holders including public authorities and policy makers... 

So what does this mean to each of the players or stake holders . 

Environmental stewardship is no longer the isolated policy or domain of any one stake holder. Imiwoved consultation is vital, both sectorially and between national and EC level interests. Shared re nsibilities, particularly in areas such as safety and other environmental issues will require reaching out to create even greater links between the worlds of industry, academia and government. 

Definition of relative roles and contributions of involved stake holders. 

Decision making has to be bound to design rules based on clear requirements. Reviews are then necessary when a deviation of the requirements is proposed or when requirements of different systems coUide or conflict with each other. In most cases when a compromise is needed, the DMU as a highly understandable product description enables the decision making of aU stake holders in the levels of coordination, cooperation and collaboration (see Chap. 7) [1]. 

The above challenges in the audit process made the conviction strong to implement the system and improve the system continuously based on the feedback received from all stake holders. The objectives of the audit are shared with both students and faculty to seek their full acceptance and cooperation. This increases the chances of success and sustainability and whole-hearted participation of both faculty and students to make this practice unique and meaningful. 

Belkaya, H., Ozmen, I. H., Karamut, I. (2008, 2-4 July). The Marmaray project Managing a large scale project with various stake holders. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2008 (Vol. 2), London. 

The healthcare stake holders are shown in Fig. 10.1. Major stakeholders are providers, payers, patients, and suppliers of pharmaceuticals and medical-devices. Other stakeholders include regulatory bodies, universities, and research institutions. 

---