Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Square root method

Constants Dv and Co are determined as free parameters in the non-linear regression of the experimental J(t) dependence along with the theoretical one calculated by the least square root method. The theoretical curve calculated at Co = 1. 7-10 4 mol dm 3 and >v = 4-1 O 6 cm2 s 1 is presented with solid line in the figure. The approximation of the lattice model of the amphiphile bilayer Dv is related to the coefficient of lateral diffusion of surfactant molecules building up the bilayer by the degree of filling 0 (respectively, of vacancies 6V)... [Pg.302]

This method is also known as the square root method. If the coefficient matrix A is symmetric and positive definite, then the matrix A can be decomposed as = LU. [Pg.70]

Graham showed that the rate of diffusion of different gases through a porous diaphragm was inversely proportional to the square roots of their densities this is the basis of a method of separation of gases, and has been applied successfully to the separation of hydrogen and deuterium. [Pg.137]

The effects of data spread should be examined for all individual parameters. These individual effects usually take place simultaneously, and the combined effect is assessed using the root—sum—square (RSS) method. The total additional surface area required to obtain a certain level of design confidence is calculated from... [Pg.489]

Chocolate does not behave as a tme Hquid owing to the presence of cocoa particles and the viscosity control of chocolate is quite compHcated. This non-Newtonian behavior has been described (28). When the square root of the rate of shear is plotted against the square root of shear stress for chocolate, a straight line is produced. With this Casson relationship method (29) two values are obtained, Casson viscosity and Casson yield value, which describe the flow of chocolate. The chocolate industry was slow in adopting the Casson relationship but this method now prevails over the simpler MacMichael viscometer. Instmments such as the Carri-Med Rheometer and the Brookfield and Haake Viscometers are now replacing the MacMichael. [Pg.95]

The third method uses a term median sensitivity to express the sensitivity (Shimomura and Shimomura, 1985). Median sensitivity is the pCa value (—log [Ca2+]) at which the initial light intensity is equal to the square root of /oTmxj where Io is the initial intensity measured with no Ca2+added and /max is the initial intensity measured with lOmM Ca2+. Thus, at the median sensitivity on pCa scale, the initial light intensity value is at the midpoint of Io and /max on log (light... [Pg.125]

The standard deviation s is the square root of the variance graphically, it is the horizontal distance from the mean to the point of inflection of the distribution curve. The standard deviation is thus an experimental measure of precision the larger s is, the flatter the distribution curve, the greater the range of. replicate analytical results, and the Jess precise the method. In Figure 10-1, Method 1 is less precise but more nearly accurate than Method 2. In general, one hopes that a and. r will coincide, and that 5 will be small, but this happy state of affairs need not exist. [Pg.269]

For the usual accurate analytical method, the mean f is assumed identical with the true value, and observed errors are attributed to an indefinitely large number of small causes operating at random. The standard deviation, s, depends upon these small causes and may assume any value mean and standard deviation are wholly independent, so that an infinite number of distribution curves is conceivable. As we have seen, x-ray emission spectrography considered as a random process differs sharply from such a usual case. Under ideal conditions, the individual counts must lie upon the unique Gaussian curve for which the standard deviation is the square root of the mean. This unique Gaussian is a fluctuation curve, not an error curve in the strictest sense there is no true value of N such as that presumably corresponding to a of Section 10.1—there is only a most probable value N. [Pg.275]

The finding that the rates of chain polymerisations are proportional to the square root of the initiator concentration is well established for a large number of polymerisation reactions. An example is shown in Figure 2.1, which also illustrates the method by which such initiator exponents are determined, i.e. by a plot of log R v. log [I]. [Pg.29]

The cyclic voltammograms of ferrlcyanlde (1.0 mM In 1.0 M KCl) In Fig. 2 are Illustrative of the results obtained for scan rates below 100 mV/s. The peak separation is 60 mV and the peak potentials are Independent of scan rate. A plot of peak current versus the square-root of the scan rate yields a straight line with a slope consistent with a seml-lnflnlte linear diffusion controlled electrode reaction. The heterogeneous rate constant for the reduction of ferrlcyanlde was calculated from CV data (scan rate of 20 Vs using the method described by Nicholson (19) with the following parameter values D 7.63 X 10 cm s , D, = 6.32 X 10 cm s, a 0.5, and n =1. The rate constants were found to be... [Pg.586]

The accuracy of this method depends on correct extrapolation of the experimental data. The error associated with the extrapolation can be reduced by plotting the experimental data not as a function of concentration but as a function of the square root of concentration. It will be shown below that in this case the experimental data for dilute solutions fall onto a straight line that can be extrapolated more accurately than a curve to zero concentration. [Pg.113]

The nonlinear character of log has not often been discussed previously. Nevertheless, Jorgensen and Duffy [26] argued the need for a nonlinear contribution to their log S regression, which is a product of H-bond donor capacity and the square root of H-bond acceptor capacity divided by the surface area. Indeed, for the example above their QikProp method partially reflects for this nonlinearity by predichng a much smaller solubility increase for the indole to benzimidazole mutation (0.45 versus 1.82 [39, 40]). Abraham and Le [41] introduced a similar nonlinearity in the form of a product of H -bond donor and H -bond acceptor capacity while all logarithmic partition coefficients are linear regressions with respect to their solvation parameters. Nevertheless, Abraham s model fails to reflect the test case described above. It yields changes of 1.8(1.5) and 1.7(1.7) [42] for the mutations described above. [Pg.301]

The determination of the number of the SHG active complex cations from the corresponding SHG intensity and thus the surface charge density, a°, is not possible because the values of the molecular second-order nonlinear electrical polarizability, a , and molecular orientation, T), of the SHG active complex cation and its distribution at the membrane surface are not known [see Eq. (3)]. Although the formation of an SHG active monolayer seems not to be the only possible explanation, we used the following method to estimate the surface charge density from the SHG results since the square root of the SHG intensity, is proportional to the number of SHG active cation com-... [Pg.452]

The principal difference between analytical TLC and preparative TLC is one of scale and not of procedure or method. Scale up is achieved by increasing the thickness of the layer and the length of the edge of the plate to which the sample is. applied. Preparative TLC plates range in size from 20 x 20 cm to 20 X 100 cm and are coated with a sorbent layer 0.5 to 10.0 as thick. The most commonly used layer thicknesses are 1.0 and 2.0 mm. Analytical layers are suitable for micropreparative applications and when high resolution is required. In general, the loading capacity increases with the square root of the layer thickness but the resolution is usually less for thicker layers. [Pg.369]

The method preferred in our laboratory for determining the UWL permeability is based on the pH dependence of effective permeabilities of ionizable molecules [Eq. (7.52)]. Nonionizable molecules cannot be directly analyzed this way. However, an approximate method may be devised, based on the assumption that the UWL depends on the aqueous diffusivity of the molecule, and furthermore, that the diffusivity depends on the molecular weight of the molecule. The thickness of the unstirred water layer can be determined from ionizable molecules, and applied to nonionizable substances, using the (symmetric) relationship Pu = Daq/ 2/iaq. Fortunately, empirical methods for estimating values of Daq exist. From the Stokes-Einstein equation, applied to spherical molecules, diffusivity is expected to depend on the inverse square root of the molecular weight. A plot of log Daq versus log MW should be linear, with a slope of —0.5. Figure 7.37 shows such a log-log plot for 55 molecules, with measured diffusivities taken from several... [Pg.207]

The basic theory of mass transfer to a RHSE is similar to that of a RDE. In laminar flow, the limiting current densities on both electrodes are proportional to the square-root of rotational speed they differ only in the numerical values of a proportional constant in the mass transfer equations. Thus, the methods of application of a RHSE for electrochemical studies are identical to those of the RDE. The basic procedure involves a potential sweep measurement to determine a series of current density vs. electrode potential curves at various rotational speeds. The portion of the curves in the limiting current regime where the current is independent of the potential, may be used to determine the diffusivity or concentration of a diffusing ion in the electrolyte. The current-potential curves below the limiting current potentials are used for evaluating kinetic information of the electrode reaction. [Pg.192]

A critical comparison between experiment and theory is hindered by the range of experimental values reported in the literature for each molecule. This reflects the difficulty in the measurement of absolute ionization cross sections and justifies attempts to develop reliable semiempirical methods, such as the polarizability equation, for estimating the molecular ionization cross sections which have not been measured or for which only single values have been reported. The polarizability model predicts a linear relationship between the ionization cross section and the square root of the ratio of the volume polarizability to the ionization potential. Plots of this function against experimental values for ionization cross sections for atoms are shown in Figure 7 and for molecules in Figure 8. The equations determined... [Pg.346]

The information content resulting from both processing methods is identical insofar as correlation information is concerned. The matrix-square-root transformation can minimize artefacts due to relay effects and chemical shift near degeneracy (pseudo-relay effects80-82 98). The application of covariance methods to compute HSQC-1,1-ADEQUATE spectra is described in the following section. [Pg.272]

Tossing a mental coin, the decision was to analyze the case of noise proportional to the square root of the signal. This, as you will recall, is Poisson-distributed noise, characteristic of the noise encountered when the limiting noise source is the shot noise that occurs when individual photons are detected and represent the ultimate sensitivity of the measurement. This is a situation that is fairly commonly encountered, since it occurs, as mentioned previously, in UV-Vis instrumentation as well as in X-ray and gamma-ray measurements. This noise source may also enter into readings made in mass spectrometers, if the detection method includes counting individual ions. We have, in... [Pg.285]


See other pages where Square root method is mentioned: [Pg.67]    [Pg.783]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.783]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.397]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.408]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.70 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info