Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Specificity of interactions

Can any number of identical subunits be accommodated in the asymmetric unit while preserving specificity of interactions within an icosahedral arrangement This question was answered by Don Caspar then at Children s Hospital, Boston, and Aaron Klug in Cambridge, England, who showed in a classical paper in 1962 that only certain multiples (1, 3, 4, 7...) of 60 subunits are likely to occur. They called these multiples triangulation numbers, T. Icosahedral virus structures are frequently referred to in terms of their trian-gulation numbers a T = 3 virus structure therefore implies that the number of subunits in the icosahedral shell is 3 x 60 = 180. [Pg.330]

The formation of a transcriptionally active complex requires the interaction of all transcription cofactors with their respective specific DNA sequences. Once they have bound to their specific sequences, it is on these that the remaining elements of the complex that do not interact directly with the DNA are assembled (Chin 1995 Filardo 2002). The elements of the complex that do not come into direct contact with DNA have their own specificity of interaction with the remaining proteins of the complex. Therefore, they include important restrictions so that a fully active transcriptional complex can be assembled with difficulty on a receptor dimer that has incorrectly recognized a HRE. Indeed, an incorrect interaction can imply a noticeable degree of transcription inhibition. [Pg.47]

CNTs own excellent materials properties. DNA is an excellent molecule to construct macromolecular networks because it is easy to synthesize, with a high specificity of interaction, and is conformationally flexible. The complementary base-paring properties of DNA molecules have been used to make two-dimensional crystals and prototypes of DNA computers and electronic circuits (Yan et al., 2002 Batalia et al., 2002). Therefore functionalization of CNTs with DNA molecules has great potential for applications such as developing nanodevices or nanosystems, biosensors, electronic sequencing, and gene transporters. [Pg.183]

For checking the specificity of interactions between glycoprotein and lectin, an incubation in the presence and the absence of 1 -5 mM of the respective monosaccharide, e.g., a-methylmannoside for ConA or GlcNAc for WGA, cf. Table 2.16), is recommended. [Pg.76]

Each tRNA has an amino acid arm with the terminal sequence CCA(3 ) to which an amino acid is esterified, an anticodon arm, a Ti//C arm, and a D arm some tRNAs have a fifth arm. The anticodon is responsible for the specificity of interaction between the aminoacyl-tRNA and the complementary mRNA codon. [Pg.1067]

With the methods already described above, disulfide-bridged antiparallel and parallel two-stranded peptides can be prepared. The question arises which peptides are stable under benign conditions. The best way to test for specificity of interaction for the parallel or antiparallel orientation is to place the peptides in a redox buffer with various additives to determine if there is specificity and what interactions are driving the specificity. [Pg.89]

Possible explanation for Increased chiral recognition from experiments with solvent order and Irradiation. The necessity of both macro-solvent order and interconversion via an excited state of BN In order to observe the largest atroplsomerlc excesses Indicates that a combination of factors, working In concert, may be responsible. In toto, these must result in a greater Interaction energy (and, therefore specificity of Interaction) between solvent molecules and excited BN. [Pg.165]

SH3 domains are used extensively by cytoskeletal and signaling proteins to mediate protein-protein interactions, and they do so through a proline-rich motif. This has a consensus sequence P-X-X-P. Another motif—the WW domain—also facilitates protein-protein interactions, and it too is based on proline. Its consensus sequence is P-P-X-Y (a Type I WW repeat as identified in the extracellular matrix receptor /3-dystroglycan) and this interacts with a WW domain in dystrophin or utrophin (Ilsley et al, 2002 Winder, 2001). These two motifs are interesting, not only because they are short and proline-rich, but because they are able to impose considerable specificity of interaction on the proteins involved. [Pg.22]

Molecular Determinants Associated With the Specificity of Interaction of PDZ-Domain-Containing Proteins With the 5-HT2A or 5-HT2C Receptor C-Termini... [Pg.247]

Structurally, each Ga subunit consists of two domains—a GTPase domain, and a a-helical domain. In between these two domains is a cleft where guanine nucleotide binds. Lipid modification of a Cys residue near the amino-terminus of the Ga subunit allows for binding to membrane [8], and the carboxyl terminus of the protein appears important for interaction with receptor. Indeed, the last five residues of Ga are believed to contribute to specificity of interaction [reviewed in 9]. However Ho and Wong [10] have demonstrated that the amino terminus of Gaz is also a critical determinant of its coupling to the delta opioid receptor. [Pg.90]

Sampling frequencies 25 If I take that formula seriously, then two bubbles or even two pockets of vacuum will attract across a material body. How can two nothings do anything 26 Does charge-fluctuation resonance translate into specificity of interaction 26 How does retardation come in 27 Can there ever be a negative Hamaker coefficient and a positive charge-fluctuation energy 28... [Pg.1]

Does charge-fluctuation resonance translate into specificity of interaction ... [Pg.26]

Advances in microelectronic technology, combined with the specificity of interactions of biological molecules such as antibodies and receptors, have led to the development of biosensors where the signal generated by the molecular interaction is transdnced into electronic signals. Biosensors have applications in diagnostics where predefined molecular interactions are measnred. They can also be valuable in the research laboratory for the characterization of rates of biomolecnlar interactions. Biosensors based on... [Pg.252]

Most studies deal with cobalt clathrochelates. In several cases, nonmacrocyclic tris-diamine complexes have also been investigated to elucidate the specificity of interactions brought about by the formation of cage structures. [Pg.280]

Note first that in this older picture, for both the attractive (van der Waals) forces and for the repulsive double-layer forces, the water separating two surfaces is treated as a continuum (theme (i) again). Extensions of the theory within that restricted assumption are these van der Waals forces were presumed to be due solely to electronic correlations in the ultra-violet frequency range (dispersion forces). The later theory of Lifshitz [3-10] includes all frequencies, microwave, infra-red, ultra and far ultra-violet correlations accessible through dielectric data for the interacting materials. All many-body effects are included, as is the contribution of temperature-dependent forces (cooperative permanent dipole-dipole interactions) which are important or dominant in oil-water and biological systems. Further, the inclusion of so-called retardation effects, shows that different frequency responses lock in at different distances, already a clue to the specificity of interactions. The effects of different geometries of the particles, or multiple layered structures can all be taken care of in the complete theory [3-10]. [Pg.97]

As demonstrated in recent studies [65-68], organic molecules have a crucial role in the formation of biosilica owing to the specificity of interactions at the organic-inorganic interface. Biosilicification has been studied most extensively in diatoms and sponges. The proteins involved in biosilicification in these different marine species will be reviewed here, along with the mechanistic basis for their function. [Pg.858]


See other pages where Specificity of interactions is mentioned: [Pg.200]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.641]    [Pg.647]    [Pg.647]    [Pg.713]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.448]    [Pg.600]    [Pg.1025]    [Pg.789]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.161]    [Pg.3168]    [Pg.3181]    [Pg.1324]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.133]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.106 ]




SEARCH



Effects of specific interactions

Introduction of Specific Interacting Groups

Principle of specific interaction

Self-assembly due to specific kinds of biopolymer interactions

Specific Issues Regarding Evaluation of Chinese Botanical Product Drug Interactions

Specific interaction sites of sugar molecules

Specificity of the Hormone-Receptor Interaction

© 2024 chempedia.info