Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Specific surface work

Figure 1.14. Periodic variation of the surface tension (specific surface work) at 0 K for metals of Groups 1 to 14 (see Figure 1.4 for meaning of points). Figure 1.14. Periodic variation of the surface tension (specific surface work) at 0 K for metals of Groups 1 to 14 (see Figure 1.4 for meaning of points).
Here d is the wear particle diameter, Hy is the Vickers hardness of the mechanically weaker material, and is the work of adhesion that is found from a knowledge of specific surface work and interfadal energy between surface a and slider b, yh ... [Pg.21]

Following the pioneer work of Beebe in 1945, the adsorption of krypton at 77 K has come into widespread use for the determination of relatively small surface areas because its saturation vapour pressure is rather low (p° 2Torr). Consequently the dead space correction for unadsorbed gas is small enough to permit the measurement of quite small adsorption with reasonable precision. Estimates of specific surface as low as 10 cm g" have been reported. Unfortunately, however, there are some complications in the interpretation of the adsorption isotherm. [Pg.77]

In the pioneer work of Foster the correction due to film thinning had to be neglected, but with the coming of the BET and related methods for the evaluation of specific surface, it became possible to estimate the thickness of the adsorbed film on the walls. A number of procedures have been devised for the calculation of pore size distribution, in which the adsorption contribution is allowed for. All of them are necessarily somewhat tedious and require close attention to detail, and at some stage or another involve the assumption of a pore model. The model-less method of Brunauer and his colleagues represents an attempt to postpone the introduction of a model to a late stage in the calculations. [Pg.134]

The constant given the value 5 in equation 1 depends on particle size, shape, and porosity it can be assumed to be 5 for low porosities. Although equation 1 has been found to work reasonably well for incompressible cakes over narrow porosity ranges, its importance is limited in cake filtration because it cannot be used for most practical, compressible cakes. It can, however, be used to demonstrate the high sensitivity of the pressure drop to the cake porosity and to the specific surface of the soHds. [Pg.391]

Commercially available pre-coated plates with a variety of adsorbents are generally very good for quantitative work because they are of a standard quality. Plates of a standardised silica gel 60 (as medium porosity silica gel with a mean porosity of 6mm) released by Merck have a specific surface of 500 m /g and a specific pore volume of 0.75 mL/g. They are so efficient that they have been called high performance thin layer chromatography (HPTLC) plates (Ropphahn and Halpap J Chromatogr 112 81 1975). In another variant of thin layer chromatography the... [Pg.18]

Some authors have suggested the use of fluorene polymers for this kind of chromatography. Fluorinated polymers have attracted attention due to their unique adsorption properties. Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) is antiadhesive, thus adsorption of hydrophobic as well as hydrophilic molecules is low. Such adsorbents possess extremely low adsorption activity and nonspecific sorption towards many compounds [109 111]. Fluorene polymers as sorbents were first suggested by Hjerten [112] in 1978 and were tested by desalting and concentration of tRN A [113]. Recently Williams et al. [114] presented a new fluorocarbon sorbent (Poly F Column, Du Pont, USA) for reversed-phase HPLC of peptides and proteins. The sorbent has 20 pm in diameter particles (pore size 30 nm, specific surface area 5 m2/g) and withstands pressure of eluent up to 135 bar. There is no limitation of pH range, however, low specific area and capacity (1.1 mg tRNA/g) and relatively low limits of working pressure do not allow the use of this sorbent for preparative chromatography. [Pg.167]

How does yield stress depend on the size of particles We have mentioned above that increasing the specific surface, i.e. decreasing an average size of particles of one type, causes an increase in yield stress. This fact was observed in many works (for example [14-16]). Clear model experiments the purpose of which was to reveal the role of a particle s size were carried out in work [8], By an example of suspensions of spherical particles in polystyrene melt it was shown that yield stress of equiconcentrated dispersions may change by a hundred of times according to the diameter d of non-... [Pg.80]

Large yields of polymer seem to be obtained only when polymerization proceeds on the outer catalyst surface, because the transport of high molecular polyethylene from catalyst pores is impossible (112). The working part of the specific surface of the catalyst can be expected to increase with diminishing strength of links between catalyst particles (112). Therefore, to obtain a highly active catalyst a support with large pore volume should be used (e.g. silica with pore volume >1.5 cm8/g). [Pg.181]

Celluloses (native or microcrystalline) are organic sorbents. They have a low specific surface area and are applied mainly in partition chromatography, especially for the separation of relatively polar compounds. Works on the topic include those by Whitton and coworkers [8], who examined biosynthetic pathways for the formation of taurine in vertebrates. Taurine and its precursor amino acids were extracted from tissues, and the purified supernatant was spotted onto cellulose plates. The... [Pg.201]

Baranton S, Coutanceau C, Gamier E, Leger JM. 2006. How does a-FePc catalysts dispersed onto high specific surface carbon support work towards oxygen reduction reaction (orr) J Electroanal Chem 590 100-110. [Pg.367]

A few additional points have also been raised by specific surface-science work concerning the catalytic reduction of NO. For instance, it has been widely recognized that the reaction is sensitive to the structure of the catalytic surface. It was determined that rough surfaces such as (110), or even (100), planes enhance NO dissociation over flatter (111) surfaces, and also favor N2 desorption instead of N20 production. On the other hand, NO dissociation leads to poisoning by the resulting atomic species, hence the faster reaction rates seen with medium-size vs. larger particles on model rhodium supported catalyst (the opposite appears to be true on palladium). Also, at least in the case of palladium, the formation of an isocyanate (-NCO) intermediate was identified... [Pg.90]

The chemical composition of the samples was determined using an inductively Coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer (ICP-AES) JY 38 from Jobin Yvon. Specific surface area values were determined by BET method using a Micromeritics Instrument Corp. FlowSorb 2300. The basicity of the materials was studied by temperature programmed desorption (TPD) of C02 used as a probe molecule. The equipment was described in a previous work [7]. FTIR spectra of pellets pressed at 2.5xl08 Pa were recorded with a Vector 22 spectrometer from Brucker. The samples were diluted with KBr (lOOmg KBr - 1.5mg of the sample). [Pg.298]

A relation between rupture phenomena and (specific) surface energy 7 was postulated by Dupre 4 almost simultaneously with the hypothesis of Quincke. Let a cylindrical rod be broken in tension. After rupture, two new gas — solid interfaces of vr2 each are present, r being the radius of the rupture surface. Consequently, the work of rupture ought to contain a term 2 nr2 7 . Dupre did not indicate how to separate this term from the main component of the work of rupture, which is the work required to extend the rod to its maximum elongation (or strain). The modern development of Dupre s ideas is reviewed in Section III.3. below. [Pg.10]

Since the latex is slightly polydisperse the specific surface area of the latex cannot be calculated with sufficient accuracy. We will therefore present the adsorption results per unit mass of the latex. Note, that we are in this work only concerned with the surfactant composition on the surface and not the absolute value of the amount of adsorbed surfactant per unit area. [Pg.226]


See other pages where Specific surface work is mentioned: [Pg.32]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.436]    [Pg.436]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.424]    [Pg.424]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.436]    [Pg.436]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.424]    [Pg.424]    [Pg.590]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.638]    [Pg.538]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.63]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.107]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.28 ]




SEARCH



Specific surface

Surface specificity

Surface specifity

Work surfaces

© 2024 chempedia.info