Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Specific interaction equations

Next, predictive equations for activity coefficients in mixed electrolyte solutions, based upon results in simpler ones, will be mentioned. The work of Brjlnsted (12) and of Guggenheim (13) led to the specific interaction equation... [Pg.566]

COM Compostizo, A, Cancho, S.M., Colin, AC, and Rubio, R.G., Polymer solutions with specific interactions equation of state for poly(4-hydroxystyrene) + acetone. Macromolecules,... [Pg.609]

The energy of solvation can be further broken down into terms that are a function of the bulk solvent and terms that are specifically associated with the first solvation shell. The bulk solvent contribution is primarily the result of dielectric shielding of electrostatic charge interactions. In the simplest form, this can be included in electrostatic interactions by including a dielectric constant k, as in the following Coulombic interaction equation ... [Pg.206]

A requirement underlying the validity of Zisman plots is that there be no specific interactions, such as acid-base interactions, between the solid surface and the probe liquids. Such interactions, however, can, in principle, be taken into account by Young s equation, provided the contact angle remains finite. Their... [Pg.24]

Display space-filling models of endo adduct and exo adduct. Which appears to be the less crowded Identify specific interactions which disfavor the higher-energy adduct. Next, compare energies of the two adducts. Which is the more stable Were the reaction under thermodynamic control, which would be the major product and what would be the ratio of major to minor products Use equation (1). [Pg.276]

In the absence of specific interactions of the receptor - ligand type the change in the Helmholtz free energy (AFadj due to the process of adsorption is AFads = yps - ypi - Ysi, where Yps, YPi and ys, are the protein-solid, protein-liquid and solid-liquid interfacial tensions, respectively [5], It is apparent from this equation that the free energy of adsorption of a protein onto a surface should depend not only of the surface tension of the adhering protein molecules and the substrate material but also on the surface tension of the suspending liquid. Two different situations are possible. [Pg.137]

Using equation (5.2), solubility parameters can be calculated for both the polymer and the solvent. Where there is no specific interaction between the polymer and the solvent, and neither has a tendency to crystallise, the polymer will generally dissolve in the solvent if (8 — 8 ) is less than about 4.0 if it is much above 4.0, the polymer is insoluble in the polymer. When hydrogen-bonding occurs, however, a polymer of greatly differing 8 value may dissolve in a given solvent. [Pg.68]

In the Born equation, the ion solvent interaction energy is determined only by one physical parameter of the solvent, i.e., the dielectric constant. However, since actual ion-solvent interactions include specific interactions such as the charge-transfer interaction or hydrogen bonds, it is natural to think that the Born equation should be insufficient. It is well known that the difference in the behavior of an ion in different solvents is not often elucidated in terms of the dielectric constant. [Pg.42]

Compartmental soil modeling is a new concept and can apply to both modules. For the solute fate module, for example, it consists of the application of the law of pollutant mass conservation to a representative user specified soil element. The mass conservation principle is applied over a specific time step, either to the entire soil matrix or to the subelements of the matrix such as the soil-solids, the soil-moisture and the soil-air. These phases can be assumed in equilibrium at all times thus once the concentration in one phase is known, the concentration in the other phases can be calculated. Single or multiple soil compartments can be considered whereas phases and subcompartments can be interrelated (Figure 2) with transport, transformation and interactive equations. [Pg.53]

That is why logically to assume the possibility of specific interactions also during the swelling process, since the values of parameters of the coal solubility S2, which are determining accordingly to the Flory Renner s equation are differed. It depends on fact if the data for all solvents are taking into account in calculations or such calculations are performed with the exclusion of results for solvents able to be as acceptors of hydrogen bonds (amines, ketones). Different results have been obtained also under application of other methods for calculations, especially of the Van-Krevelen s method [14],... [Pg.54]

Comment on the relevancy of this result to Equation (78). Criticize or defend the following proposition The geometrical mixing rule does not require the absence of permanent dipoles, only that 11 and 22 interactions both consist of the same fraction of London and permanent dipole contributions. Specific interactions, such as hydrogen bonding, must also be absent in the 11, 22, and 12 systems. [Pg.496]

Interactions between Reagents on Oxide Surface. When the catalyst is exposed to a reaction mixture, the adsorbed species formed may react between themselves and with the molecules from the gas phase. Any combination of interactions may represent possible steps of the mechanism of the reaction. In order to isolate elementary steps, the reagents are adsorbed in successive sequences (20, 23, 35). The amount of heat evolved for each sequence gives evidence of a specific interaction if different possible thermochemical equations are compared with the thermochemical data for the homogeneous reaction. [Pg.299]

All six basic types of fluid phase behaviour have been found experimentally. Type I to V can be predicted with simple equations of state like the van der Waals equation, however type VI, which is found in systems in which specific interactions like hydrogen bonding plays a role, is only predicted with more complicated equations of state like the SAFT equation of state [6-8]. In the mean time many more types of fluid phase behaviour have been found computationally [9], but up till now they have not been found in real systems. [Pg.27]

In many production routes, and also during processing, polymer systems have to undergo pressure. Changes in the volume of a system by compression or expansion, however, cannot be dealt with in rigid-lattice-type models. Thus, non-combinatorial free volume ( equation of state ) contributions to AG have been advanced [23 - 29]. Detailed interaction functions have been suggested (but all of them are based on adjustable parameters, for blends, e.g., Mean-field lattice gas [30], SAFT [31], specific interactions [32]), and have been succesfully applied, for example, by Kennis et al. [33]. [Pg.579]


See other pages where Specific interaction equations is mentioned: [Pg.123]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.411]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.963]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.1240]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.615]    [Pg.520]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.455]    [Pg.455]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.686]    [Pg.348]   


SEARCH



Interactions equation

Specific interaction equations models

The specific ion interaction equations

© 2024 chempedia.info