Solvents, acidic classification

In nonaqueous solvents, the classification of strong and weak acids, and the pH scales are dramatically different ... 

The solvent triangle classification method of Snyder is the most enduring approach to solvent characterization used by chromatographers, but in several respects is not entirely satisfactory [568,575,576]. Snyder classified solvents based on their interactions with three prototypical solutes determined by their gas-liquid distribution constants corrected for differences in solvent size, polarizability and dispersion interactions (assumed identical to the interactions of a hypothetical n-alkane with the same molar volume). Each value was then corrected empirically to give a value of zero for the polar distribution constant for saturated hydrocarbon solvents. Snyder chose the solutes nitromethane, ethanol and dioxane as probes for a solvent s capacity for dipole-type, hydrogen-bond base and hydrogen-bond acid interactions, respectively. The sum of the three polar distribution constants provides a measure of the solvent strength P ) and the ratio of the individual polar distribution constants to their sum a measure of selectivity (xn, and Xd). 

Battery breaking technologies use wet classification to separate the components of cmshed batteries. Before cmshing, the sulfuric acid is drained from the batteries. The sulfuric acid is collected and stored for use at a later stage in the process, or it may be upgraded by a solvent extraction process for reuse in battery acid. 

Finish removers are appHed by bmshing, spraying, troweling, flowing, or soaking. Removal is by water rinse, wipe and let dry, or solvent rinse. Removers may be neutral, basic, or acidic. The viscosity can vary from water thin, to a thick spray-on, to a paste trowel-on remover. The hazard classification, such as flammable or corrosive, is assigned by the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) for the hazardous materials contained in the remover. 

On the Brpnsted theory (p. 51), solutions with concentrations of H3O+ greater than that in pure water are acids (proton donors), and solutions rich in OH are bases (proton acceptors). The same classifications follow from the solvent-system theory of acids and bases... 

Titanium, D. of as oxide, via tannic acid and phenazone complexes, (g) 470 by hydrogen peroxide, (s) 696 Titan yellow 692 Titrand 257 Titrant 257 Titration 257 classification of, 258 in an inert atmosphere, 376, 629 in non-aqueous solvents, 281 aniline (and ethanolamine), D. of, 307 indicators for, 283 solvents for, 283... 

From our previous treatment of the Arrhenius, Bransted and Lewis acid-base theories, the importance of the choice between the divergent solvent types clearly appeared if we now confine ourselves to solvents to which the proton theory in general is applicable, this leads to a classification of eight classes as already proposed by Bronsted35,36 (Table 4.3). 

With regard to this classification, Bronsted made the following very important remark "Solvents of class 4, on account of their comparatively slight acidic and basic character, are the most nearly similar to class 8 in their... 

Liquid chromatography (LC) activated alumina applications, 2 400 adsorption, 1 610-611 of ascorbic acid, 25 760 basic principles, 4 603-606 classification of solvents for, 23 87... 

Huntsman solvent-based collection and refining system, 15 506 Huron-Dow process, 14 42, 53 Huygens principle, 17 424 H values, 23 284 Hyaluronan, 20 577 Hyaluronic acid, 4 706 20 456 classification by structure, 4 723t function as ingredient in cosmetics, 7 829t... 

The solvent classifications used here are (1) solvents possessing both Lewis acid and Lewis base properties and a dielectric constant (D) > 25 (2) solvents possessing both Lewis acid and Lewis base properties and D < 25 (3) solvents possessing only Lewis acid properties and D> 25 (4) same as(3) but D < 25 (5) solvents possessing only Lewis base properties and D> 25 (6) same as(5)but D < 25 (7) solvents possessing negligible Lewis acid or base properties and D > 25 and (8) same as (7) but D < 25. 

Some other classification schemes are provided in a work by Kolthoff (Kolthoff, 1974). It is according to the polarity and is described by the relative permittivity (dielectric constant) e, the dipole moment p (in 10 ° C.m), and the hydrogen-bond donation ability Another suggested classification (Parker, 1969) stresses the acidity and basicity (relative to water) of the solvents. A third one (Chastrette, 1979), stresses the hydrogen-bonding and electron-pair donation abilities, the polarity, and the extent of self-association. A fourth is a chemical constitution scheme (Riddick et al., 1986). The differences among these schemes are mainly semantic ones and are of no real consequence. Marcus presents these clearly (Marcus, 1998). 

The three general classifications of acid-gas removal processes are 1) amines, 2) activated hot potassium carbonate, and 3) physical solvents. These systems each have preferred operating ranges, as generally controlled by the acid-gas partial pressure, have different energy requirements, and offer different degrees of selectivity. 

The classification of solvents has been dealt with in various books on non-aque-ous solvents [25, 26]. In the classification of solvents, it is usual to use some solvent properties as criteria. In order to discuss solvent effects on chemical reactions, it is convenient to use relative permittivities and acid-base properties as the criteria. 

The heterogeneous class of compounds marked by solubility in so-called lipid solvents (acetone, hydrocarbons, ether, etc.) and relative insolubility in water, has traditionally been called lipids (3). This historical classification, based upon isolation procedures from natural products, is obviously too broad for simple generalizations since it includes triglycerides, fatty acids, phospholipids, sterols, sterol esters, bile acids, waxes, hydrocarbons, fatty ethers and hydrocarbons. For the purposes of this chapter, we will consider lipids to be fatty acids and their derivatives. 

Extracted lipids in this procedure may be used for certain further analysis, such as determination of fatty acid profile f UN1TD1.2) and oxidative state f UNITS 1)2.t 1)2.2) of the oil however, for lipid classification, incomplete extraction of polar lipids into nonpolar solvents may not allow for accurate determination and quantitation. 

For phenolics in fruit by-products such as apple seed, peel, cortex, and pomace, an HPLC method was also utilized. Apple waste is considered a potential source of specialty chemicals (58,62), and its quantitative polyphenol profile may be useful in apple cultivars for classification and identification. Chlorogenic acid and coumaroylquinic acids and phloridzin are known to be major phenolics in apple juice (53). However, in contrast to apple polyphenolics, HPLC with a 70% aqueous acetone extract of apple seeds showed that phloridzin alone accounts for ca. 75% of the total apple seed polyphenolics (62). Besides phloridzin, 13 other phenolics were identified by gradient HPLC/PDA on LiChrospher 100 RP-18 from apple seed (62). The HPLC technique was also able to provide polyphenol profiles in the peel and cortex of the apple to be used to characterize apple cultivars by multivariate statistical techniques (63). Phenolic compounds in the epidermis zone, parenchyma zone, core zone, and seeds of French cider apple varieties are also determined by HPLC (56). Three successive solvent extractions (hexane, methanol, aqueous acetone), binary HPLC gradient using (a) aqueous acetic acid, 2.5%, v/v, and (b) acetonitrile fol-... 

---