Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Solvent optimisation techniques

Mujtaba (1999) considered the conventional configuration of BED processes for the separation of binary close boiling and azeotropic mixtures. Dynamic optimisation technique was used for quantitative assessment of the effectiveness of BED processes. Two distinct solvent feeding modes were considered and their implications on the optimisation problem formulation, solution and on the performance of BED processes were discussed. A general Multiperiod Dynamic Optimisation (MDO) problem formulation was presented to obtain optimal separation of all the components in the feed mixture and the recovery of solvent while maximising the overall profitability of the operation. [Pg.303]

An interpretable electron density map has since been obtained using a combination of optimised anomalous and isomorphous phase information modified by solvent flattening techniques (Rule, Harding and Sawyer, unpublished). [Pg.367]

When the chromatographic mode, column type, packing and dimensions have been chosen, the final stage of method development involves solvent optimisation and a choice between isocratic or gradient elution. Many separations can be achieved perfectly satisfactorily under isocratic conditions and are preferred to gradient elution techniques, as these are inconvenient due to the time required to re-equilibrate the column. A measure of the quality of separation is given by the resolution factor which can be expressed as follows ... [Pg.344]

Post-column on-line derivatisation is carried out in a special reactor situated between the column and detector. A feature of this technique is that the derivatisation reaction need not go to completion provided it can be made reproducible. The reaction, however, needs to be fairly rapid at moderate temperatures and there should be no detector response to any excess reagent present. Clearly an advantage of post-column derivatisation is that ideally the separation and detection processes can be optimised separately. A problem which may arise, however, is that the most suitable eluant for the chromatographic separation rarely provides an ideal reaction medium for derivatisation this is particularly true for electrochemical detectors which operate correctly only within a limited range of pH, ionic strength and aqueous solvent composition. [Pg.228]

Each step of the synthesis usually needs optimisation of reaction conditions (time, temperature, solvents, concentrations). Different techniques of reaction activation can also be used. Microwave heating has been shown to give faster, cleaner and more selective reactions [22,23] than conventional heating. Ultrasound, although promising [24], has not known the same development. Finally, catalysed reactions involving palladium complexes have been developed in car-bone- 11 chemistry [25 ] over the last few years. They have not been widely studied in fluorine-18 chemistry. [Pg.205]

Summarising, to optimise the partition coefficient P of a solute i, P, should be maximised by mixing three solvents in the correct proportions. The use of mixture design statistical techniques with the natural logarithm of the partition coefficient as response criterion is a valid way to achieve this. [Pg.270]

For the enantiomeric separation of propanolol, MIP monoliths have been rendered porous by the addition of isooctane in toluene at 2%. The poor solvent content is a crucial parameter for controlling the porosity of the MIP monolith, a higher concentration of poor solvent leading to a more porous but also more fragile material. Actually, a combination of these two techniques, where the selection of the poor solvent and the timing of polymerisation is optimised, can also be employed for the preparation of preformed imprinted monoliths [166, 167],... [Pg.61]

Conducting polymers have already been well documented in conjunction with the classical ionophore-based solvent polymeric ion-selective membrane as an ion-to-electron transducer. This approach has been applied to both macro- and microelectrodes. However, with careful control of the optimisation process (i.e. ionic/electronic transport properties of the polymer), the doping of the polymer matrix with anion-recognition sites will ultimately allow selective anion recognition and ion-to-electron transduction to occur within the same molecule. This is obviously ideal and would allow for the production of durable microsensors, as conducting polymer-based electrodes, and due to the nature of their manufacture these are suited to miniaturisation. There are various examples of anion-selective sensors formed using this technique reported in the literature, some of which are listed below. [Pg.108]

Tran and Mujtaba (1997), Mujtaba et al. (1997) and Mujtaba (1999) have used an extension of the Type IV- CMH model described in Chapter 4 and in Mujtaba and Macchietto (1998) in which few extra equations related to the solvent feed plate are added. The model accounts for detailed mass and energy balances with rigorous thermophysical properties calculations and results to a system of Differential and Algebraic Equations (DAEs). For the solution of the optimisation problem the method outlined in Chapter 5 is used which uses CVP techniques. Mujtaba (1999) used both reflux ratio and solvent feed rate (in semi-continuous feeding mode) as the optimisation variables. Piecewise constant values of these variables over the time intervals concerned are assumed. Both the values of these variables and the interval switching times (including the final time) are optimised in all the SDO problems mentioned in the previous section. [Pg.316]

Solvent system optimisation can be done on the basis of trial and error according to the literature data or the intuition and experience of the chromatographer 57. The mobile phase optimisation procedure is based on Snyder s solvent characterisation 58 and is called the PRISMA system 157). which uses a three-step optimisation procedure. The proper stationary phase and the possible individual solvents are chosen, and their combination is. selected by means of the PRISMA model, while this combination is adapted to the selected technique (e.g.. FF-TLC. saturated immersion mode, etc.). [Pg.467]

The implications for device applications are straightforward, b-Phase chro-mophores are much more resilient to optically induced and, most probably, also to electrically injected excitations. Therefore, OLEDs made out of PFO (J> phase should show extended lifetime operation with respect to those containing a large number of chains in the glassy phase. Optimisation of the quantity of ( >-phasc chains by employing vapour swelling techniques or with the use of well-defined protocols involving different solvents will be crucial for device operation [56]. [Pg.306]

In summary, the Kobayashi solution to the development of a SILP for catalytic applications in liquid biphasic conditions implies the adoption of a more robust anchoring technique of the catalytically active species to the solid support and of a IL/solvent pair as far as possible in terms of mutual solubility, namely water and [dbim][SbF6]. The role of the IL impregnated on the solid support is that of creating a hydrophobic environment on the surface of the silica material where the catalyst, ionically bound to the organic spacer, exerts its role promoting the desired reaction. Since the catalyst is easily separated from water, the system could be easily optimised for recycle. [Pg.73]

Ion-exchange chromatography involves more variables than other forms of chromatography. Distribution coefficients and selectivities are functions of pH, solute charge and radius, resin porosity, ionic strength and type of buffer, type of solvent and temperature. The number of experimental variables makes lEC a very versatile technique but a difficult one because of the effort needed to optimise a separation. [Pg.25]


See other pages where Solvent optimisation techniques is mentioned: [Pg.344]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.753]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.246]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.482]    [Pg.731]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.634]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.566]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.417]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.668]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.6]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.342 ]




SEARCH



Optimisation

Optimisation Optimise

Optimisation Optimised

Solvent optimisation

Solvent techniques

© 2024 chempedia.info