Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Solvent microenvironment

Sfudies on fhe properfies/behavior of ILs may be complicated because the latter easily absorb small amounts of water (up to 3-5% w/w). The absorbed water affects the bulk solvent properties (i.e., viscosity and density) and may therefore alter the local solvent microenvironment surrounding a solute. Water can quench the luminescence and the resulting luminescence properties of ions can be strongly influenced by water. The dissolved organic solvent and water in ILs can be removed by keeping the IL under vacuum (10 -10 bar) at 50-60°C for at least 7-10 h [38]. [Pg.302]

Because many important chemical transformations, inclnding aldol condensations, Sn2 substitutions, E2 eliminations are sensitive to solvent microenvironment, this strategy is likely to be increasingly exploited in the development of a wide variety of catalytic antibodies. [Pg.385]

The importance of substrate destabilization is illustrated by the antibody-catalyzed decarboxylation of 3-carboxybenzisoxazoles (5) to give salicylo-nitriles (7) [34]. This reaction is extraordinarily sensitive to its solvent microenvironment, with rate enhancements up to 10 -fold observed upon transfer of the reactant from aqueous buffCT to aprotic dipolar solvents [35]. De solvation of the negatively charged carboxylate group greatly destabilizes the substrate, while the charge delocalized transition state (6) may be stabilized by dispersion interactions with solvent. Similar factors are believed... [Pg.349]

Mass-action model of surfactant micelle formation was used for development of the conceptual retention model in micellar liquid chromatography. The retention model is based upon the analysis of changing of the sorbat microenvironment in going from mobile phase (micellar surfactant solution, containing organic solvent-modifier) to stationary phase (the surfactant covered surface of the alkyl bonded silica gel) according to equation ... [Pg.81]

Based on a series of studies of the effect of organic solvent on the reaction of Ca-ATPase with Pj and ATP synthesis, De Meis et al. proposed that a different solvent structure in the phosphate microenvironment in Ej and E2 forms the basis for existence of high- and low-energy forms of the aspartyl phosphate [93]. Acyl phosphates have relatively low free energy of hydrolysis when the activity of water is reduced, due to the change of solvation energy. The covalently bound phosphate may also reside in a hydrophobic environment in E2P of Na,K-ATPase since increased partition of Pj into the site is observed in presence of organic solvent [6] in the same manner as in Ca-ATPase. [Pg.15]

The dielectric constant of the solvent in the microenvironment of the polymer chain has been shown to be different from that in the bulk solvent (19). This change in dielectric constant might enhance the nucleophilicity of the pyridine ring and therefore increase the rate of quaternization. The kinetic results are consistent with the observations of Overberger et al., (20), who showed that increased hydrophobic nature of the substrate led to faster reaction rates in nucleophilic catalysis. In the present case one would expect the butadiene copolymer to be more hydrophobic than the methylvinylether copolymer. An alternative synthesis of supernucleophilic polymers has been achieved using the following reaction sequence. [Pg.77]

In polar solvents, the structure of the acridine 13 involves some zwitterionic character 13 a [Eq. (7)] and the interior of the cleft becomes an intensely polar microenvironment. On the periphery of the molecule a heavy lipophilic coating is provided by the hydrocarbon skeleton and methyl groups. A third domain, the large, flat aromatic surface is exposed by the acridine spacer unit. This unusual combination of ionic, hydrophobic and stacking opportunities endows these molecules with the ability to interact with the zwitterionic forms of amino acids which exist at neutral pH 24). For example, the acridine diacids can extract zwitterionic phenylalanine from water into chloroform, andNMR evidence indicates the formation of 2 1 complexes 39 such as were previously described for other P-phenyl-ethylammonium salts. Similar behavior is seen with tryptophan 40 and tyrosine methyl ether 41. The structures lacking well-placed aromatics such as leucine or methionine are not extracted to measureable degrees under these conditions. [Pg.208]

Solvatochromic probes have been used for a variety of applications like the study polarity of pure and mixed solvents [99], and the retention behavior in reverse-phase liquid chromatography [100] among other applications. Frechet et al. used 4-(N-methylamino)-l-nitrobenzene (p-MANB), as the chromophore, to probe the microenvironment of polyaromatic ether based dendrimers [101]. [Pg.49]

Two dendrimers based on Fe-porphyrin core carrying peptide-like branches of different sizes have been synthesized in order to have more open and a more densely packed (23) structures [43]. The electrochemical behavior has been examined in CH2C12 and in aqueous solution. In the less polar solvent, the two dendrimers show similar potentials for the Fem/Fen couple, suggesting that the iron porphyrins in both the more open and the more densely packed dendrimers experience similar microenvironments. On the contrary, in water the behavior of the two dendrimers is very different since the reduction from Fem to Fe11 is much easier for the densely packed dendrimer. This result can be explained considering that in the dendrimer with the relatively open structure the aqueous solvation of the iron porphyrin is still possible, whereas in the densely packed one the contact between the heme and the external solvent is signifi-... [Pg.222]

Ellison EH, Moodley D, Hime J (2006) Fluorescence study of arene probe microenvironment in the intraparticle void volume of zeolites interfaced with bathing polar solvents. J Phys Chem B 110 4772 1781... [Pg.22]

It is seen that the fluorescence quantum yield and lifetime of G19 gradually decreases with increasing solvent polarity. For example, the insertion of 20% ACN by volume into toluene leads to a decrease of a factor of two. Based on these results we can conclude that G19 is very sensitive to solvent polarity and can be used as an efficient probe to test the polarity of its microenvironment. A reverse trend of the absorption peak at 1 1 mixture of ACN and toluene (50%T in Fig. 22b) corresponds to a change of the sign of due to a transition from a polyene-like structure in nonpolar toluene to a polymethine-like structure in polar ACN. [Pg.138]

Molecular rotors are useful as reporters of their microenvironment, because their fluorescence emission allows to probe TICT formation and solvent interaction. Measurements are possible through steady-state spectroscopy and time-resolved spectroscopy. Three primary effects were identified in Sect. 2, namely, the solvent-dependent reorientation rate, the solvent-dependent quantum yield (which directly links to the reorientation rate), and the solvatochromic shift. Most commonly, molecular rotors exhibit a change in quantum yield as a consequence of nonradia-tive relaxation. Therefore, the fluorophore s quantum yield needs to be determined as accurately as possible. In steady-state spectroscopy, emission intensity can be calibrated with quantum yield standards. Alternatively, relative changes in emission intensity can be used, because the ratio of two intensities is identical to the ratio of the corresponding quantum yields if the fluid optical properties remain constant. For molecular rotors with nonradiative relaxation, the calibrated measurement of the quantum yield allows to approximately compute the rotational relaxation rate kor from the measured quantum yield [Pg.284]

Another example of fluorescence intensity modulation in cou-marins is the 3-azido substitution that quenches the fluorescence completely. These compounds are used as starting material for the synthesis of fluorescent triazolocoumarins by click chemistry [31], Interestingly, the fluorescence of some coumarins depends strongly on the solvent. This is the case for 7-alkoxycoumarins that have been used as probes for microenvironments [32], 7-hydroxycoumarin that is pH sensitive, and 7-NR2 substituted coumarins such as coumarin 120 whose quantum yield is reduced in nonpolar solvents due to a change in the 3D structure [33],... [Pg.246]

It was in article [52] where the main reason responsible for the above-mentioned peculiarities was explicitly formulated and substantiated. Its authors related these peculiarities with partitioning of monomer molecules between the bulk of a reaction mixture and the domain of a growing polymer radical. This phenomenon induced by preferential sorption of one of the monomers in such a domain is known as the bootstrap effect. This term was introduced by Harwood [53], because when growing a polymer radical can control under certain conditions its own microenvironment. This original concept enabled him to interpret many interesting features peculiar to this phenomenon. Particularly, he managed to qualitatively explain the similarity of the sequence distribution in copolymerization products of the same composition prepared in different solvents under noticeable discrepancies in composition of monomer mixtures. [Pg.171]

Water is a polar solvent so has different solvation properties that discriminate between polar and non-polar molecules. Chemical discrimination results in the formation of mixed phases, such as membranes, microenvironments and compartmentalisation. [Pg.226]

Ionic reactions of neutral substrates can show large solvent dependence, due to the differential solvent stabilization of the ionic intermediates and their associated dipolar transition states (Reichardt, 1988). This is the case for the electrophilic addition of bromine to alkenes (Ruasse, 1990, 1992 Ruasse et al., 1991) and the bromination of phenol (Tee and Bennett, 1988a), both of which have Grunwald-Winstein m values approximately equal to 1 so that the reactions are very much slower in media less polar than water. Such processes, therefore, would be expected to be retarded or even inhibited by CDs for two reasons (a) the formation of complexes with the CD lowers the free concentrations of the reactants and (b) slower reaction within the microenvironment of the less polar CD cavity (if it were sterically possible). [Pg.17]

In Section 3.4, structural effects were often discussed in conjunction with the nature of the solvent. As emphasized in the introduction to this book, the fluorescence emitted by most molecules is indeed extremely sensitive to their microenvironment (see Figure 1.3), which explains the extensive use of fluorescent probes. The effects of solvent polarity, viscosity and acidity deserves much attention because these effects are the basis of fluorescence probing of these microenvironmental characteristics and so, later chapters of this book are devoted to these aspects. The effects of polarity and viscosity on fluorescence characteristics in fluid media and the relevant applications are presented in Chapters 7 and 8, respectively. The effect of acidity is discussed in Sections 4.5 and 10.2. This section is thus mainly devoted to rigid matrices or very viscous media, and gases. [Pg.67]

Evolution of fluorescence spectra during the lifetime of the excited state can provide interesting information. Such an evolution occurs when a fluorescent compound is excited and then evolves towards a new configuration whose fluorescent decay is different. A typical example is the solvent relaxation around an excited-state compound whose dipole moment is higher in the excited state than in the ground state (see Chapter 7) the relaxation results in a gradual red-shift of the fluorescence spectrum, and information on the polarity of the microenvironment around a fluorophore is thus obtained (e.g. in biological macromolecules). [Pg.192]

After these preliminary remarks, the term polarity appears to be used loosely to express the complex interplay of all types of solute-solvent interactions, i.e. nonspecific dielectric solute-solvent interactions and possible specific interactions such as hydrogen bonding. Therefore, polarity cannot be characterized by a single parameter, although the polarity of a solvent (or a microenvironment) is often associated with the static dielectric constant e (macroscopic quantity) or the dipole moment p of the solvent molecules (microscopic quantity). Such an oversimplification is unsatisfactory. [Pg.202]


See other pages where Solvent microenvironment is mentioned: [Pg.37]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.511]    [Pg.643]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.511]    [Pg.643]    [Pg.350]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.407]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.548]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.568]    [Pg.569]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.207]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.95 ]




SEARCH



Microenvironment

Microenvironments

© 2024 chempedia.info