Solutions of Nonelectrolytes

T V — nRT. Van t Hoff noted the parallel between this law and the ideal gas equation, and he proposed that solute molecules in solution act independently of one another. Van t Hoffs law worked for solutions of nonelectrolytes and weak electrolytes, but for strong electrolytes, van t Hoff had to multiply n by a coefficient, i. For HCl and NaCl the value of i was close to 2, and for CaCl2, i was close to 3. For this reason, strong electrolytes were considered to be exceptions to van t Hoffs law. 

Figure 7.4 shows such functions for binary solutions of a number of strong electrolytes and for the purposes of comparison, for solutions of certain nonelectrolytes (/ ). We can see that in electrolyte solutions the values of the activity coefficients vary within much wider limits than in solutions of nonelectrolytes. In dilute electrolyte solutions the values of/+ always decrease with increasing concentration. For... 

In solutions of nonelectrolytes where the particles do not interact electrostatically, the value of logoften increases linearly with increasing concentration ogfi, = b c... 

Van t Hoff introduced the correction factor i for electrolyte solutions the measured quantity (e.g. the osmotic pressure, Jt) must be divided by this factor to obtain agreement with the theory of dilute solutions of nonelectrolytes (jt/i = RTc). For the dilute solutions of some electrolytes (now called strong), this factor approaches small integers. Thus, for a dilute sodium chloride solution with concentration c, an osmotic pressure of 2RTc was always measured, which could readily be explained by the fact that the solution, in fact, actually contains twice the number of species corresponding to concentration c calculated in the usual manner from the weighed amount of substance dissolved in the solution. Small deviations from integral numbers were attributed to experimental errors (they are now attributed to the effect of the activity coefficient). 

It is commonly recognized that aqueous solutions are usually highly non-ideal, but until recent years, no theoretical explanation was available for aqueous solutions of nonelectrolytes. 

A nonpolar neutral species in a polar medium such as water experiences interfacial tension. Solvophobic theory is a general statement of hydrophobic theory, which has been developed to explain the tendency of neutral organic species to flee the water phase. It has been reported that the solution of nonelectrolytes in water is attended by a net decrease in entropy [65,158]. This has been attributed to an increased structuring of water molecules in the vicinity of the solute. The process may be conceptually rationalized by considering that a solute must occupy space in a cohesive medium. The solute must create a cavity in the water milieu and then occupy that cavity [19,65,158]. The very high cohesive density of water creates considerable interfacial tension in the... 

We will proceed in our discussion of solutions from ideal to nonideal solutions, limiting ourselves at first to nonelectrolytes. For dilute solutions of nonelectrolyte, several limiting laws have been found to describe the behavior of these systems with increasing precision as infinite dilution is approached. If we take any one of them as an empirical mle, we can derive the others from it on the basis of thermodynamic principles. 

In the preceding chapters we considered Raoult s law and Henry s law, which are laws that describe the thermodynamic behavior of dilute solutions of nonelectrolytes these laws are strictly valid only in the limit of infinite dilution. They led to a simple linear dependence of the chemical potential on the logarithm of the mole fraction of solvent and solute, as in Equations (14.6) (Raoult s law) and (15.5) (Heiuy s law) or on the logarithm of the molality of the solute, as in Equation (15.11) (Hemy s law). These equations are of the same form as the equation derived for the dependence of the chemical potential of an ideal gas on the pressure [Equation (10.15)]. 

An alternative approach that is particularly applicable to binary solutions of nonelectrolytes is that of excess thermodynamic functions for the solution instead of activities for the components. That approach is most useful in treatments of phase equihbria and separation processes [1], and it will be discussed in Section 16.7. 

We shall see in Chapter 17 that it is frequently difficult to obtain reliable data at very low concentrations to demonstrate experimentally that Henry s law is followed in dilute solutions of nonelectrolytes. 

The activity coefficients of solute and solvent are of comparable magnitudes in dilute solutions of nonelectrolytes, so that Equation (17.33) is a useful relationship. But the activity coefficients of an electrolyte solute differ substantially from unity even in very dilute solutions in which the activity coefficient of the solvent differs from unity by less than 1 x 10 . The data in the first three columns of Table 19.3 illustrate the situation. It can be observed that the calculation of the activity coefficient of solute from the activity coefficient of water would be imprecise at best. 

Kipling, J. J., Adsorption from Solutions of Nonelectrolytes, Academic, New York, 1965. 

One of the many ways to classify inorganic compounds is into electrolytes, nonelectrolytes, and weak electrolytes. When electrolytes are dissolved in water, the resulting solution is a good conductor of electricity the water solutions of nonelectrolytes do not conduct electricity the solutions of weak electrolytes are very poor conductors. Water itself is an extremely poor conductor of electricity. A flow of current is a movement of electrical charges caused by a difference in potential (voltage) between the two ends of the conductor. 

Kipling, J. J. Adsorption from solutions of nonelectrolytes, New York Academic Press 1965... 

Equilibrium concentrations describe the maximum possible concentration of each compound volatilized in the nosespace. Despite the fact that the process of eating takes place under dynamic conditions, many studies of volatilization of flavor compounds are conducted under closed equilibrium conditions. Theoretical equilibrium volatility is described by Raoulf s law and Henry s law for a description of these laws, refer to a basic thermodynamics text such as McMurry and Fay (1998). Raoult s law does not describe the volatility of flavors in eating systems because it is based upon the volatility of a compound in a pure state. In real systems, a flavor compound is present at a low concentration and does not interact with itself. Henry s law is followed for real solutions of nonelectrolytes at low concentrations, and is more applicable than Raoult s law because aroma compounds are almost always present at very dilute levels (i.e., ppm). Unfortunately, Henry s law does not account for interactions with the solvent, which is common with flavors in real systems. The absence of a predictive model for real flavor release necessitates the use of empirical measurements. 

A nonelectrolyte is a substance that dissolves to give a solution that does not conduct electricity. Nonelectrolyte solutions (solutions of nonelectrolytes) do not contain ions. Aqueous solutions of acetone (1) and glucose (2) are nonelecrrolyte solutions. 

Mikhailov draws attention to the fact that Persianova and Tarasov have studied compressibility of aqueous solutions of nonelectrolytes and found it necessary also to postulate the filling of cavities in a quasicrystalline lattice of water. This again agrees with our claim that solutes —both electrolytes and nonelectrolytes—do not significantly influence the temperature at which the kinks are observed and that this must be explained by assuming that there exists in such solutions elements of water structure which are unaffected by the presence of the solute. It is possible (to be discussed elsewhere) that the structured units responsible for the kinks merely possess a latent existence in pure water and that it is indeed the presence of the solute which induces the stabilization and thus furthers rather than disrupts the original structuredness of the water. 

We have mentioned these examples of the effects of nonelectrolytes on water structure only to indicate the important information which may be derived from studies of this type (see also Refs. 50 and 38). Elsewhere, we will discuss the available evidence for discreteness in water structure based on the behavior of aqueous solutions of nonelectrolytes. When combined with the information about solutions of electrolytes (treated here) a better understanding of the structural properties of water in solutions may emerge. 

Until recently, experiments were limited to aqueous solutions of nonelectrolytes which are weakly ionized such as isobutyric acid or phenol, or which were doped with ions to achieve conductance. Andersen and Greer [132] critically assessed many earlier data and concluded that a (1 — a) singularity is most probable. 

Oiffusivity The kinetic theory of liquids is much less advanced than that of gases. Therefore, the correlation for diffusivities in liquids is not as reliable as that for gases. Among several correlations reported, the Wilke-Chang correlation (Wilke and Chang, 1955) is the most widely used for dilute solutions of nonelectrolytes,... 

SCHAY,G., Adsorption of solutions of nonelectrolytes , in reference 9 2,155-211 (1969) Thermodynamics of adsorption from solution , in reference 15 ... 

All the laws discussed so far are valid for dilute solutions of nonelectrolytes. If there is a solute that is an electrolyte, the ions contribute independently to the effective molal (or molar) concentration. The ions interact and, therefore, the effects are not as large as predicted by the mathematical equations. 

The thermodynamics properties of an electrolytic solution are generally described by using the activities of different ionic species present in the solution. The problem of defining activities is however somewhat more complicated in electrolytic solution than in solutions of nonelectrolytes. The requirement of overall electrical neutrality in the solution prevents any increase in the charge due to negative ions. Consider the 1 1 electrolyte AB which dissociates into A+ ions and B ions in the aqueous solution. 

Notwithstanding the considerations of Section 2.12.1, the use of the bulk dielectric constant of water for dilute solutions of nonelectrolyte is not very inaccurate in the region outside the primary solvation sheath. The point is that in this region (i.e., at distances > 500 to 1000 pm from the ion s center), there is neghgible structure breaking and therefore a neghgible decrease in dielectric constant from the bulk value. 

No one has yet proposed a quantitative theory of aqueous solutions of nonelectrolytes, and such solutions will probably be the last to be understood fully. (Rowlinson and Swinton, 1982). 

Eq. (2) does not contain any adjustable parameter and can be used to predict the gas solubility in mixed solvents in terms of the solubilities in the individual solvents (1 and 3) and their molar volumes. Eq. (2) provided a very good agreement [9] with the experimental gas solubilities in binary aqueous solutions of nonelectrolytes a somewhat modified form correlated well the gas solubilities in aqueous salt solutions [17]. The authors also derived the following rigorous expression for the Henry constant in a binary solvent mixture [9] (Appendix A for the details of the derivation) ... 

Relationships for Diffusivity in Very Dilute Binary Solutions of Nonelectrolytes... 

---