Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Solution kinetics 155 First-order reaction

In 13 M NH4F, Am(iv) autoreduces at a rate of about 4% per hour [140], increasing to 10% per hour in 3 m fluoride solution [261]. Self-reduction of Am(iv) to Am(iii) in phosphoric acid solution follows first-order reaction kinetics [261-263]. [Pg.46]

The effect of nitrous acid on the nitration of mesitylene in acetic acid was also investigated. In solutions containing 5-7 mol 1 of nitric acid and < c. 0-014 mol of nitrous acid, the rate was independent of the concentration of the aromatic. As the concentration of nitrous acid was increased, the catalysed reaction intervened, and superimposed a first-order reaction on the zeroth-order one. The catalysed reaction could not be made sufficiently dominant to impose a truly first-order rate. Because the kinetic order was intermediate the importance of the catalysed reaction was gauged by following initial rates, and it was shown that in a solution containing 5-7 mol 1 of nitric acid and 0-5 mol 1 of nitrous acid, the catalysed reaction was initially twice as important as the general nitronium ion mechanism. [Pg.58]

Scheme 10. Mechanislic possibililies for PF condensalion. Mechanism a involves an SN2-like attack of a phenolic ring on a methylol. This attack would be face-on. Such a mechanism is necessarily second-order. Mechanism b involves formation of a quinone methide intermediate and should be Hrst-order. The quinone methide should react with any nucleophile and should show ethers through both the phenolic and hydroxymethyl oxygens. Reaction c would not be likely in an alkaline solution and is probably illustrative of the mechanism for novolac condensation. The slow step should be formation of the benzyl carbocation. Therefore, this should be a first-order reaction also. Though carbocation formation responds to proton concentration, the effects of acidity will not usually be seen in the reaction kinetics in a given experiment because proton concentration will not vary. Scheme 10. Mechanislic possibililies for PF condensalion. Mechanism a involves an SN2-like attack of a phenolic ring on a methylol. This attack would be face-on. Such a mechanism is necessarily second-order. Mechanism b involves formation of a quinone methide intermediate and should be Hrst-order. The quinone methide should react with any nucleophile and should show ethers through both the phenolic and hydroxymethyl oxygens. Reaction c would not be likely in an alkaline solution and is probably illustrative of the mechanism for novolac condensation. The slow step should be formation of the benzyl carbocation. Therefore, this should be a first-order reaction also. Though carbocation formation responds to proton concentration, the effects of acidity will not usually be seen in the reaction kinetics in a given experiment because proton concentration will not vary.
Consecutive reactions involving one first-order reaction and one second-order reaction, or two second-order reactions, are very difficult problems. Chien has obtained closed-form integral solutions for many of the possible kinetic schemes, but the results are too complex for straightforward application of the equations. Chien recommends that the kineticist follow the concentration of the initial reactant A, and from this information rate constant k, can be estimated. Then families of curves plotted for the various kinetic schemes, making use of an abscissa scale that is a function of c kit, are compared with concentration-time data for an intermediate or product, seeking a match that will identify the kinetic scheme and possibly lead to additional rate constant estimates. [Pg.75]

In Fig. 28, the abscissa kt is the product of the reaction rate constant and the reactor residence time, which is proportional to the reciprocal of the space velocity. The parameter k co is the product of the CO inhibition parameter and inlet concentration. Since k is approximately 5 at 600°F these three curves represent c = 1, 2, and 4%. The conversion for a first-order kinetics is independent of the inlet concentration, but the conversion for the kinetics of Eq. (48) is highly dependent on inlet concentration. As the space velocity increases, kt decreases in a reciprocal manner and the conversion for a first-order reaction gradually declines. For the kinetics of Eq. (48), the conversion is 100% at low space velocities, and does not vary as the space velocity is increased until a threshold is reached with precipitous conversion decline. The conversion for the same kinetics in a stirred tank reactor is shown in Fig. 29. For the kinetics of Eq. (48), multiple solutions may be encountered when the inlet concentration is sufficiently high. Given two reactors of the same volume, and given the same kinetics and inlet concentrations, the conversions are compared in Fig. 30. The piston flow reactor has an advantage over the stirred tank... [Pg.119]

Both complexes (867) and (868) promote the hydrolysis of urea in a two-step process.2080 Heating of (867) or (868) in acetonitrile solution produced ammonia with kinetic first-order dependence on complex concentration and an observed rate constant of (7.7 0.5) x 10-4 h-1 to yield a cyanate complex as the reaction product. When the reaction was carried out in 50% aqueous acetonitrile solution, ammonia was produced at the same rate but without buildup of the cyanate-containing product, suggesting that the latter is hydrolyzed in the presence of water. The hydrolysis rate was also first order in water, indicating that it occurred by attack of an external water on the coordinated cyanate.2080... [Pg.461]

Adsorption and desorption between the solution phase and sand, silt and clay in suspension and on the bed. First order reaction kinetics are used. [Pg.138]

It has been found that both the anhydrous Form III and dihydrate phases of carbamazepine exhibit fluorescence in the solid state [78]. The fluorescence intensity associated with the dihydrate phase was determined to be significantly more intense than that associated with the anhydrate phase, and this difference was exploited to develop a method for study of the kinetics of the aqueous solution-mediated phase transformation between these forms. Studies were conducted at temperatures over the range of 18 40 °C, and it was found that the phase transformation was adequately characterized by first-order reaction kinetics. The temperature dependence in the calculated rate constants was used to calculate activation energy of 11.2 kCal/ mol (47.4 cal/g) for the anhydrate-to-dihydrate phase conversion. [Pg.273]

Kunii and Levenspiel(1991, pp. 294-298) extend the bubbling-bed model to networks of first-order reactions and generate rather complex algebraic relations for the net reaction rates along various pathways. As an alternative, we focus on the development of the basic design equations, which can also be adapted for nonlinear kinetics, and numerical solution of the resulting system of algebraic and ordinary differential equations (with the E-Z Solve software). This is illustrated in Example 23-4 below. [Pg.590]

As explained earlier, the pre-equilibria are characterized by the limiting values of Michaelis-Menten kinetics. In the case of first-order reactions with respect to the substrate, we have Kfvl [S]0. Since the pre-equilibria are shifted to the side of educts during hydrogenation, only the solvent complex is detectable. In contrast, in the case of zero-order reactions only catalyst-substrate complexes are expected under stationary hydrogenation conditions in solution. These consequences resulting from Michaelis-Menten kinetics can easily be proven by var-... [Pg.283]

The parameter [3 is related to the contrast. If (3A> > 1, equation 1 reduces to that of a simple first order reaction (such as CEL materials are usually assumed to follow (6)). If 3A< < 1, the reaction becomes second order in A In a similar manner, the sensitized reaction varies between zero order and first order. For the anthracene loadings required by the PIE process (13,15), A is close to 1M, so (3 > > 1 is required for first order unsensitized kinetics. Although in solution, 3 for DMA is -500, and -25 for DPA (20), we have found [3 =3 for DMA/PEMA, and (3=1 for DPA/PBMA. Thus although the chemical trends are in the same direction in the polymer as in solution, the numbers are quite different, indicating a substantial... [Pg.339]

Thus, for an element whose removal from seawater follows first-order reaction kinetics, its MORT is the inverse of its removal rate constant. This relationship predicts that reactive elements should have short residence times. As shown in Figure 21.3, the actual data do demonstrate a linear relationship (r = 0.79, p = 0.00), although a log-log plot is required to cover the several orders of magnitude diversity of MORT and concentrations exhibited by the solutes in seawater. A similar relationship exists between the MORT and the seawater-crustal rock partition coefficient (Ay). The latter is defined as the ratio of the mean seawater concentration of an element to its mean concentration in crustal rocks. Elements with high partitioning coefficients would be expected to have low seawater concentrations. As shown in Figure 21.4, this is seen in the data and... [Pg.554]

The equations used in these models are primarily those described above. Mainly, the diffusion equation with reaction is used (e.g., eq 56). For the flooded-agglomerate models, diffusion across the electrolyte film is included, along with the use of equilibrium for the dissolved gas concentration in the electrolyte. These models were able to match the experimental findings such as the doubling of the Tafel slope due to mass-transport limitations. The equations are amenable to analytic solution mainly because of the assumption of first-order reaction with Tafel kinetics, which means that eq 13 and not eq 15 must be used for the kinetic expression. The different equations and limiting cases are described in the literature models as well as elsewhere. [Pg.464]

Since the ORR is a first-order reaction following Tafel kinetics, the solution of the mass conservation equation (eq 23) in a spherical agglomerate yields an analytic expression for the effectiveness factor... [Pg.467]

Kinetics in polycrystals differ from those in solution phase, because in the former, the thermal reactions usually follow a nonexponential rate law, something that is attributed to a multiple-site problem. In contrast to a first-order reaction in solution, the rate constant of a nonexponential process in the solid state is time dependent molecules located in the reactive site will have decayed during the warmup procedure and/or the initial stage of the reaction at the given temperature. These considerations need to be taken into account when the decay of the intensity of the IR signals in a matrix at low temperature are used for kinetic measurements [70]. [Pg.142]

Thus for each zone, during a given cycle, the adsorption-desorption process is separated into two distinct events with F or G describing the kinetics of each event. Such an approach is of course valid only for first order rate reactions. In the limit of low concentration, (such as that resulting from slow leaching from a repository) the reaction sites on the rock will not approach saturation and the number of reaction sites can be considered to remain constant during adsorption. Therefore, for a single species in solution at tracer concentrations the reaction should approximate a first order reaction (i.e., where no complications such as concentration effects, step-wise dehydration, dissociation, etc., are present). [Pg.169]

The basic premise of the original kinetic description of inhibition was that, for a reaction to proceed on a surface, one or more of the reactants (A) must be adsorbed on that surface in reversible equilibrium with the external solution, having an equilibrium adsorption constant of KA, and the adsorbed species must undergo some transformation involving one or more adsorbed intermediates (n) in the rate-limiting step, which leads to product formation. The product must desorb for the reaction cycle to be complete. If other species in the reaction mixture (I) can compete for the same adsorption site, the concentration of the adsorbed reactant (Aad) on the surface will be lower than when only pure reactant A is present. Thus, the rate of conversion will depend on the fraction of the adsorption sites covered by the reactant (0A) rather than the actual concentration of the reactant in solution, and the observed rate coefficient (fcobs) will be different from the true rate coefficient (ktme). In its simplest form the kinetic expression for this phenomenon in a first-order reaction can be described as follows ... [Pg.442]

Direct evidence that hydrolysis reactions going by the Aac1 mechanism are kinetically first-order can be obtained, at least in principle, for reactions in strongly acidic solution, because the activity of water varies significantly with the acid concentration. Graham and Hughes 7 showed that the hydrolysis of methyl benzoate in sulphuric acid at 20°C is first-order with respect to ester concentration, but zeroth-order with respect to water in concentrations up to 1 M. Leisten6 showed further that the first-order rate coefficient for this reaction is almost independent of the initial concentration of the ester, and thus ruled out the possibility that a bimolecular attack by bisulphate ion is involved, since the ester is completely protonated in 100% sulphuric acid and tfe concentration of bisulphate ion depends on the concentration of the ester, viz. [Pg.82]

Platinum(IV) is kinetically inert, but substitution reactions are observed. Deceptively simple substitution reactions such as that in equation (554) do not proceed by a simple SN1 or 5 2 process. In almost all cases the reaction mechanism involves redox steps. The platinum(II)-catalyzed substitution of platinum(IV) is the common kind of redox reaction which leads to formal nucleophilic substitution of platinum(IV) complexes. In such cases substitution results from an atom-transfer redox reaction between the platinum(IV) complex and a five-coordinate adduct of the platinum(II) compound (Scheme 22). The platinum(II) complex can be added to the solution, or it may be present as an impurity, possibly being formed by a reductive elimination step. These reactions show characteristic third-order kinetics, first order each in the platinum(IV) complex, the entering ligand Y, and the platinum(II) complex. The pathway is catalytic in PtnL4, but a consequence of such a mechanism is the transfer of platinum between the catalyst and the substrate. 10 This premise has been verified using a 195Pt tracer.2011... [Pg.497]

The cerium(IV) oxidation of lactyllactic acid49 and of 4-oxopentanoic acid50 in aqueous nitric acid solutions shows first-order dependence of the reaction on both cerium(IV) and substrate. A 1 1 complex formation between manganese(III) and amine, which later decomposes in the rate-limiting step, best explains the kinetics of oxidation of aliphatic amines by cerium(IV) in nitric acid medium in the presence of manganese(II).51 The kinetics of oxidation of naphthalene, 2-methyhiaphthalene, and a-naphthol with cerium(IV) in perchloric acid solutions have been studied.52 Use of a 50-fold molar excess of cerium(IV) perchlorate results in complete oxidation of fluorophenols to CO2, HCO2H, and HF in 48 h at 50 °C.53... [Pg.183]

Kinetic studies show that hydrolysis of 1-organyl- and 1-alkoxysilatranes in neutral aqueous solutions is a first-order reaction catalyzed by the formed tris(2-hydroxyalkyl)amine13 294. As a rule, electron release and steric effects of the substituent X hinder the reaction. However, the hydrolytic stability of 1-methylsilatrane is just below that of 1-chloromethylsilatrane294. Successive introduction of methyl groups into the 3, 7 and 10 sites of the silatrane skeleton13,294 and substitution with ethyl group on C-459 retard sharply the hydrolysis rate. It was proposed294 that nucleophilic attack at silicon by water proceeds via formation of the four-centered intermediate 57 (equation 56). [Pg.1484]

Remark 1 The resulting optimization model is an MINLP problem. The objective function is linear for this illustrative example (note that it can be nonlinear in the general case) and does not involve any binary variables. Constraints (i), (v), and (vi) are linear in the continuous variables and the binary variables participate separably and linearly in (vi). Constraints (ii), (iii), and (iv) are nonlinear and take the form of bilinear equalities for (ii) and (iii), while (iv) can take any nonlinear form dictated by the reaction rates. If we have first-order reaction, then (iv) has bilinear terms. Trilinear terms will appear for second-order kinetics. Due to this type of nonlinear equality constraints, the feasible domain is nonconvex, and hence the solution of the above formulation will be regarded as a local optimum. [Pg.421]

Selim et al. (1976b) developed a simplified two-site model to simulate sorption-desorption of reactive solutes applied to soil undergoing steady water flow. The sorption sites were assumed to support either instantaneous (equilibrium sites) or slow (kinetic sites) first-order reactions. As pore-water velocity increased, the residence time of the solute decreased and less time was allowed for kinetic sorption sites to interact (Selim et al., 1976b). The sorption-desorption process was dominated by the equilib-... [Pg.178]

The disappearance of melphalan from aqueous solutions has been shown to follow first-order kinetics [62,82,85] and the concentration profile during hydrolysis is consistent with a mechanism consisting of two consecutive pseudo first-order reactions (Scheme III A) [53]. [Pg.292]

A kinetic study of the Vilsmeier-Haak formylation of thiophene derivatives in dichloroethane solution has been recently reported.156 Reactions of thiophene and 2-methylthiophene follow third-order kinetics, first-order in substrate, dimethylformamide (DMF), and phosphorus oxychloride. These results are in agreement with a mechanism involving a rapid preequilibrium step leading to an... [Pg.259]

The ultraviolet irradiation of halogenonitrobenzenes dissolved in ethyl ether or tetrahy-drofuran leads to an increase in the electrical conductivity of the solution relaxation of the conductivity is observed after the irradiation is stopped384. The kinetics appeared to be complicated the structure of the compound, its concentration, the nature of the solvent, the temperature, the time of irradiation as well as the light intensity had an influence on the effects. The photodegradation of three nitrochlorobenzene isomers in pure water and river water under irradiation follows first-order reaction kinetics the rate constants for the three isomers decrease in the order p-> o-> m-nitrochlorobenzene385. [Pg.908]


See other pages where Solution kinetics 155 First-order reaction is mentioned: [Pg.860]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.861]    [Pg.462]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.247]   


SEARCH



First order reaction kinetics

First reaction

First-order kinetics

First-order reactions

First-order reactions reaction

First-order reactions solutions

First-order solution

Kinetic first-order

Kinetic order

Kinetics reaction order

Kinetics, solution

Ordered solution

Ordering kinetic

Ordering kinetics

Solute order

© 2024 chempedia.info