Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Relaxation solutions

The solution obtained from the exact MINLP is not globally optimal. This is due to the fact that the value of the objective function found in the exact solution is not equal to that of the relaxed MILP. The objective function value in the relaxed solution was 1.8602 x 106 c.u., a slight improvement to that found in the exact model. [Pg.137]

In section I we consider the dynamics of rotation of a two-component neutron star and obtain the relaxation solutions for spin-down rate of the star. In section II we compare our solutions for the relaxation process with the observation data from the Vela pulsar. [Pg.47]

Relaxation solutions are conceptually the most simple methods of solution for any multistage separation process. They were first proposed by Rose et al. (R2) in 1958 and Duflin (Dl) in 1959. Both authors in... [Pg.288]

Despite the linear set of constraints, Yee and Grossmann (1990) proposed an initialization procedure for the solution of the relaxed NLP problem in the OA/ER/AP since this may improve the chances of obtaining the best relaxed solution (note that the relaxed NLP is nonconvex). This initialization procedure is presented in the appendix of their paper. [Pg.371]

In Table 3-3 a relaxation solution for the system of Fig. 3-6 is shown. For the most part, the relaxation method would be employed as an expedient vehicle only when a computer was not readily available. [Pg.95]

Table 1 resumes the model performance for each strategy, as well as the value of the objective function obtained from the real occurrences at CLC. They are also indicated the relaxed solution and the amount of time that was spent to find the optimal solution, but without proving optimality. It can be observed the model size increase between a model with ATF and the corresponding DTF. The number of binary variables increased more than 400% for the same scenario. The model size has a large impact in CPU effort. [Pg.280]

Regarding the optimal solutions obtained versus CPU effort, meanwhile in the ATF the optimal solution is found in less then 2 s, the DTP took about 18 min to prove optimality. However, the optimal solution was obtained relatively early in the search tree analysis ( 5 s of computation), which means that the majority of the CPU effort is used to prove optimality. It should also be pointed out that the relaxed solution is equal between the three strategies, representing a good accuracy between formulations. [Pg.281]

Because relaxing solute normal mode frequencies are often much higher than typical solvent translational-rotational frequencies, the following short time picture of solute VER emerges [22,24]. In zeroth order the relaxing mode executes conservative harmonic notion in a hypothetical solvent that is nonresponsive to this motion. The velocity autocorrelation function /(f) for this zeroth order motion is... [Pg.212]

Fig. 7. Concentration-dependent relaxation induced by the purified smooth muscle phosphatase holoenzyme SMPP-IM (187 kDa) and the catalytic subunit PPIC (37 kDa). Rabbit portal vein smooth muscle strips were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 and the muscles were relaxed in the absence of calcium in the presence of a 1 mM EGTA solution. Subsequent treatment with microcystin-LR (MC, 1 jiM), to inhibit endc genous SMPP-IM, induced force development even in relaxing solution (Gl, pCa 8). MC was washed away and the purified holoenzyme SMPP-IM or PPIC were added at the indicated concentration and the half-time of relaxation measured. The half-time of relaxation (tl/2) to baseline was used for comparison of the potency of SMPP-IM (solid circles) with that of PPIC (open circies n=5). (From Shirazi et al. 1994.)... Fig. 7. Concentration-dependent relaxation induced by the purified smooth muscle phosphatase holoenzyme SMPP-IM (187 kDa) and the catalytic subunit PPIC (37 kDa). Rabbit portal vein smooth muscle strips were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 and the muscles were relaxed in the absence of calcium in the presence of a 1 mM EGTA solution. Subsequent treatment with microcystin-LR (MC, 1 jiM), to inhibit endc genous SMPP-IM, induced force development even in relaxing solution (Gl, pCa 8). MC was washed away and the purified holoenzyme SMPP-IM or PPIC were added at the indicated concentration and the half-time of relaxation measured. The half-time of relaxation (tl/2) to baseline was used for comparison of the potency of SMPP-IM (solid circles) with that of PPIC (open circies n=5). (From Shirazi et al. 1994.)...
Table 3-7. Thiol-based hair relaxer solution for a hair straightener product. ... Table 3-7. Thiol-based hair relaxer solution for a hair straightener product. ...
If the specified logical requirement is modeled as Zi + Z2 — 2Z3 the optimal solution to the Unear programming relaxation is z, = 1, Z2 = 0, Z3 = 1/2 with objective function value -20. An equivalent (ILP) with a sharper (ILP) comes from modeling the requirement as Zi Z3, Z2 s Zy In this format, an optimal solution to the Unear programming relaxation is Zi = Z2 = Z3 = 1 with objective value —10. The latter form is stronger because the relaxation solution obtained is both more nearly feasible for the discrete problem and the source of a more exact bound. (In fact, the second modeUng yields an optimal solution for this instance.)... [Pg.2586]

Normalization of pH, Out of a Corrosive Zone, After Application of a Basic Hair Relaxer Solution... [Pg.87]

The boundary value problem represented by (6.73) and (6.74) is an elementary diffusion problem in a finite domain, and a solution is readily obtained in the form of an infinite series by means of separation of variables. Plots of the distribution of normalized strain e(a ,t)/em as a function of normalized distance x/a along the film for several values of normalized time tEfhfhy/a rjy are shown in Figure 6.34. From the plots, it is evident that relaxation begins at the center of the film at normalized time of approximately 0.1, and it becomes fully relaxed at a normalized time of approximately 1.0. The behavior of the stress relaxation solution implies that a characteristic time for the process is... [Pg.489]

This flexible model example consists of 4,391 equations, 935 continuous variables, and 64 binary variables. The total CPU time is 0.34 seconds and the optimal solution is found after 1,434 iterations. The LP-relaxed solution gives a value of 1,762,204m.u. for the objective function. [Pg.124]


See other pages where Relaxation solutions is mentioned: [Pg.229]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.610]    [Pg.613]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.127]   


SEARCH



Solute relaxation

© 2024 chempedia.info