Solute-column interactions

When such different techniques as in Table 1 are compared, there is always the problem of different sensitivities for different aspects of the distribution. If, for example, information about the high molar mass tail is of importance, PCS may be the method of choice. It may also be incorrect to regard the SEC distribution as the true molar mass distribution as it may suffer from calibration problems, solute-column interactions, peak broadening, and a molar mass dependence of the contrast factor d n/dc, and hence the detector sensitivity. 

We have noted above that hydrophobic interaction of the solute and column represents the main contribution to RP LC retention and column selectivity. The subtraction model assumes that we first subtract the major contribution of hydrophobicity to RP LC retention, in order to better see contributions to retention from remaining solute-column interactions. The further analysis of these minor contributions then leads to a general equation for RP LC retention and column selectivity [9, 13] ... 

This equation is also a straightforward consequence of Eqs. (1) and (2). Because the relative retention represents the ratio of distribution coefficients for two different solutes, it is frequently utilized (for the solutes of selected chemical structures) as a means to judge selectivity of the solute-column interactions. 

The main solute-column interactions can be classified as dispersion forces and dipole-dipole interactions. The dispersion forces are present in any solute-solvent system, a hydrocarbon solute interacting with a nonpolar paraffin being often shown as an example. The polar solute molecules have permanent dipoles that can interact with those of the polar phases on occasions, the dipole moments can also be induced in certain solute molecules in the presence of highly polar column materials. Dipole-dipole interactions are clearly evident in the separations of alcohols, esters, amines, aldehydes, and so on, on the poly glycol, polyamide, polyester, or cyanoalkylsilicone stationary phases. 

A reliable chromatographic method has been developed for the quantitative aneilysis of hydrophobic impurities in water-soluble polymeric dyes. The method utilizes both the molecular sieve effect of normal gel permeation chromatography and solute-column packing interaction, modified by solvent composition. This method eliminates the need to extract the impurities from the polymeric dye with 100 extraction efficiency, as would be required for an ordinary liquid chromatographic analysis. 

Recent advances have greatly decreased the difficulties raised by these cautionary points. In particular, on-line viscosimetry and multi-angle lightscattering make it possible to determine the molecular weight and viscosity of samples as a function of elution volume. With such detectors, effects of solute-column packing interactions become unimportant, since the properties of narrow fractions can be measured. These detectors will be discussed in greater detail below. 

Beyond the density changes that can be used to control method modifications in SFC, the mobile phase composition can also be adjusted. Typical LC solvents are the first choice, most likely because of their availability, but also because of their compatibility with analytical detectors. The most common mobile phase modifiers, which have been used, are methanol, acetonitrile and tetrahydrofuran (THF). Additives, defined as solutes added to the mobile phase in addition to the modifier to counteract any specific analyte-column interactions, are frequently included also to overcome the low polarity of the carbon dioxide mobile phase. Amines are among the most common additives. 

X-Y Liu, Q Yang, C Nakamura, J Miyake. Avidin-biotin-immobilized liposome column for chromatographic fluorescence on-line analysis of solute-membrane interactions. J Chromatogr B 750 51-60, 2001. 

Yang, J. and Hage, D.S., Effect of mobile phase composition on the binding kinetics of chiral solutes on a protein-based HPLC column Interactions of d- and L-tryptophan with immobilized human serum albumin, J. Chromatogr. A, 766, 15-25, 1997. 

The study of ILs in GLC has yielded important information regarding solute-solvent interactions providing valuable insights into their complex solvation interactions and thermodynamic properties for mixed solvent systems. Moreover, ILs have proven to be an important new class of stationary phases for the separation of a wide variety of different analytes. IL stationary phases will soon be commercially available which will inevitably promote further improvements in separation selectivity, thermal stability, immobilization bonding chemistry/stationary phase stability, and will broaden the range of separated compounds. IL-based stationary phases also hold great promise in GC mass spectrometry where the dual-nature selectivity of the stationary phase eliminates the need for frequent changing of columns. 

PCB ADSORPTION. PCBs are practically insoluble in water because of a very weak solute-water interaction PCBs will have a strong solute-polymer interaction if a polymer such as styrene-divinyl-benzene is used water will have a weak interaction with styrene-divinylbenzene thus, conditions for effective adsorption are present. Therefore, large volumes of water can be passed through a column packed with a styrene-divinylbenzene polymer, and the PCBs will be adsorbed (partitioned) efficiently. 

A solution composed of several solutes is injected at one end of the column and the eluent carries the solution through the stationary phase to the other end of the column. Each solute in the original solution moves at a rate proportional to its relative affinity for the stationary phase and comes out at the end of the column as a separated band. Depending on the type of adsorbent or the nature of the solute-adsorbent interaction, they are called adsorption, ion-exchange, affinity, or gel filtration chromatography. 

---