Solids pore size

Fig. 2. Solid/pore sizes for porous glasses (ds = size of the solid entities and dp = size of pores).

B. Study of Microporous Solids (Pore Size Less than 2 nm)... 

The specific surface area of a solid is one of the first things that must be determined if any detailed physical chemical interpretation of its behavior as an adsorbent is to be possible. Such a determination can be made through adsorption studies themselves, and this aspect is taken up in the next chapter there are a number of other methods, however, that are summarized in the following material. Space does not permit a full discussion, and, in particular, the methods that really amount to a particle or pore size determination, such as optical and electron microscopy, x-ray or neutron diffraction, and permeability studies are largely omitted. 

We have considered briefly the important macroscopic description of a solid adsorbent, namely, its speciflc surface area, its possible fractal nature, and if porous, its pore size distribution. In addition, it is important to know as much as possible about the microscopic structure of the surface, and contemporary surface spectroscopic and diffraction techniques, discussed in Chapter VIII, provide a good deal of such information (see also Refs. 55 and 56 for short general reviews, and the monograph by Somoijai [57]). Scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) and atomic force microscopy (AFT) are now widely used to obtain the structure of surfaces and of adsorbed layers on a molecular scale (see Chapter VIII, Section XVIII-2B, and Ref. 58). On a less informative and more statistical basis are site energy distributions (Section XVII-14) there is also the somewhat laige-scale type of structure due to surface imperfections and dislocations (Section VII-4D and Fig. XVIII-14). 

An interesting example of a large specific surface which is wholly external in nature is provided by a dispersed aerosol composed of fine particles free of cracks and fissures. As soon as the aerosol settles out, of course, its particles come into contact with one another and form aggregates but if the particles are spherical, more particularly if the material is hard, the particle-to-particle contacts will be very small in area the interparticulate junctions will then be so weak that many of them will become broken apart during mechanical handling, or be prized open by the film of adsorbate during an adsorption experiment. In favourable cases the flocculated specimen may have so open a structure that it behaves, as far as its adsorptive properties are concerned, as a completely non-porous material. Solids of this kind are of importance because of their relevance to standard adsorption isotherms (cf. Section 2.12) which play a fundamental role in procedures for the evaluation of specific surface area and pore size distribution by adsorption methods. 

A Type II isotherm indicates that the solid is non-porous, whilst the Type IV isotherm is characteristic of a mesoporous solid. From both types of isotherm it is possible, provided certain complications are absent, to calculate the specific surface of the solid, as is explained in Chapter 2. Indeed, the method most widely used at the present time for the determination of the surface area of finely divided solids is based on the adsorption of nitrogen at its boiling point. From the Type IV isotherm the pore size distribution may also be evaluated, using procedures outlined in Chapter 3. 

Type 1 isotherms, as will be demonstrated in Chapter 4, are characteristic of microporous adsorbents. The detailed interpretation of such isotherms is controversial, but the majority of workers would probably agree that the very concept of the surface area of a microporous solid is of doubtful validity, and that whilst it is possible to obtain an estimate of the total micropore volume from a Type I isotherm, only the crudest guesses can be made as to the pore size distribution. 

Isotherms of Type 111 and Type V, which are the subject of Chapter 5, seem to be characteristic of systems where the adsorbent-adsorbate interaction is unusually weak, and are much less common than those of the other three types. Type III isotherms are indicative of a non-porous solid, and some halting steps have been taken towards their use for the estimation of specific surface but Type V isotherms, which betoken the presence of porosity, offer little if any scope at present for the evaluation of either surface area or pore size distribution. 

Type IV isotherms are often found with inorganic oxide xerogels and other porous solids. With certain qualifications, which will be discussed in this chapter, it is possible to analyse Type IV isotherms (notably those of nitrogen at 77 K) so as to obtain a reasonable estimate of the specific surface and an approximate assessment of the pore size distribution. 

As already indicated in Section 3.1, the study of mesoporous solids is closely bound up with the concept of capillary condensation and its quantitative expression in the Kelvin equation. This equation is, indeed, the basis of virtually all the various procedures for the calculation of pore size... 

Section 3.7, the gas adsorption method breaks down for practical reasons. Since the angle of contact of mercury with solids is 140° (see later), and therefore more than 90°, an excess pressure Ap is required to force liquid mercury into the pores of a soh d. The idea of using mercury intrusion to measure pore size appears to have been first suggested by Washburn who put forward the basic equation... 

These procedures proposed by Dubinin and by Stoeckli arc, as yet, in the pioneer stage. Before they can be regarded as established as a means of evaluating pore size distribution, a wide-ranging study is needed, involving model micropore systems contained in a variety of chemical substances. The relationship between the structural constant B and the actual dimensions of the micropores, together with their distribution, would have to be demonstrated. The micropore volume would need to be evaluated independently from the known structure of the solid, or by the nonane pre-adsorption method, or with the aid of a range of molecular probes. 

The principal aim of the second edition of this book remains the same as that of the first edition to give a critical exposition of the use of the adsorption methods for the assessment of the surface area and pore size distribution of finely divided and porous solids. 

In writing the present book our aim has been to give a critical exposition of the use of adsorption data for the evaluation of the surface area and the pore size distribution of finely divided and porous solids. The major part of the book is devoted to the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method for the determination of specific surface, and the use of the Kelvin equation for the calculation of pore size distribution but due attention has also been given to other well known methods for the estimation of surface area from adsorption measurements, viz. those based on adsorption from solution, on heat of immersion, on chemisorption, and on the application of the Gibbs adsorption equation to gaseous adsorption. 

It would be difficult to over-estimate the extent to which the BET method has contributed to the development of those branches of physical chemistry such as heterogeneous catalysis, adsorption or particle size estimation, which involve finely divided or porous solids in all of these fields the BET surface area is a household phrase. But it is perhaps the very breadth of its scope which has led to a somewhat uncritical application of the method as a kind of infallible yardstick, and to a lack of appreciation of the nature of its basic assumptions or of the circumstances under which it may, or may not, be expected to yield a reliable result. This is particularly true of those solids which contain very fine pores and give rise to Langmuir-type isotherms, for the BET procedure may then give quite erroneous values for the surface area. If the pores are rather larger—tens to hundreds of Angstroms in width—the pore size distribution may be calculated from the adsorption isotherm of a vapour with the aid of the Kelvin equation, and within recent years a number of detailed procedures for carrying out the calculation have been put forward but all too often the limitations on the validity of the results, and the difficulty of interpretation in terms of the actual solid, tend to be insufficiently stressed or even entirely overlooked. And in the time-honoured method for the estimation of surface area from measurements of adsorption from solution, the complications introduced by... 

We therefore felt it timely to attempt a critical exposition and assessment of the common methods for the evaluation of the surface area and pore size distribution of solids from adsorption measurements. Our main concern has therefore been with the use of adsorption data for these purposes rather than with adsorption per se and it is for this reason that our treatment of theoretical matters, whilst sufficiently detailed to bring out the nature of the assumptions underlying the various methods, is not exhaustive we have not set out to write a text-book or a treatise on adsorption, and our choice of material from the literature has been dictated solely by its seeming suitability for the explanation or illustration of the topic under discussion. 

Particulate interferents can be separated from dissolved analytes by filtration, using a filter whose pore size retains the interferent. This separation technique is important in the analysis of many natural waters, for which the presence of suspended solids may interfere in the analysis. Filtration also can be used to isolate analytes present as solid particulates from dissolved ions in the sample matrix. For example, this is a necessary step in gravimetry, in which the analyte is isolated as a precipitate. A more detailed description of the types of available filters is found in the discussion of precipitation gravimetry and particulate gravimetry in Chapter 8. 

Deep Bed Filters. Deep bed filtration is fundamentally different from cake filtration both in principle and appHcation. The filter medium (Fig. 4) is a deep bed with pore size much greater than the particles it is meant to remove. No cake should form on the face of the medium. Particles penetrate into the medium where they separate due to gravity settling, diffusion, and inertial forces attachment to the medium is due to molecular and electrostatic forces. Sand is the most common medium and multimedia filters also use garnet and anthracite. The filtration process is cycHc, ie, when the bed is full of sohds and the pressure drop across the bed is excessive, the flow is intermpted and solids are backwashed from the bed, sometimes aided by air scouring or wash jets. 

Characterization. When siHca gel is used as an adsorbent, the pore stmcture determines the gel adsorption capacity. Pores are characterized by specific surface area, specific pore volume (total volume of pores per gram of solid), average pore diameter, pore size distribution, and the degree to which entrance to larger pores is restricted by smaller pores. These parameters are derived from measuring vapor adsorption isotherms, mercury intmsion, low angle x-ray scattering, electron microscopy, gas permeabiHty, ion or molecule exclusion, or the volume of imbibed Hquid (1). 

Calcium sulfate hemihydrate []0034-76-1 j M 145.2. Sol in H2O (0.2 parts/100 at 18.75°). Completely dehydrated >650°. Dry below 300° to give a solid with estimated pore size ca 38% of vol. Anhydrous CaS04 has high affinity for H2O and will absorb 6.6% of its weight of H2O to form the hemihydrate (gypsum). It sets to a hard mass with H2O, hence should be kept in a tightly sealed container. 

---