SOHIO catalyst

In this context is might also be worth mentioning that the importance of the bismuthoxo component in the SOHIO catalysts also provided the impetus for more general studies concerning the synthesis of molecular bismuthoxo compounds (clusters), their structures and their behaviour in dependence of the cluster size [57-61]. 

The latest developments in catalysts for manufacturing acrylonitrile are those of the Japanese-firm Nitto Chemical, which commercialized a system in 1974 based on doped antimony and iron, called NS 733A or catalyst 13, offering higher productivity in comparison with Sohio catalyst 41. as well as lower production of acetonitrile and hydrogen cyanide by-products. 

The second generation Sohio catalyst, introduced during the inid-l%0s, was an antimony oxide/uranium oxide mixture (U03-2Sb203). A successful iron oxide/antimony oxide catalyst containing some tellurium oxide was subsequently developed by Nitto, a Sohio licensee, in Japan. ... 

The second generation Sohio catalyst was a uranium antimonate (USbsOio). This was more active and selective than the earher bismuth phos-phomolybdate and has been described as Phase I. Active sites in the layer strac-ture were also defect-Scheelite structures containing uranium-antimoity cation pairs. Catalysts containing USbOs, or Phase 2, were less selective. 

Third generation Sohio catalysts were also based on bismuth molybdates and contained nickel, cobalt, iron, and minor amounts of other promoters. It has been suggested that the Fe /Fe redox couple facilitates the adsorption and activation of molecular oxygen at the catalyst surface. 

In 1957 Standard Oil of Ohio (Sohio) discovered bismuth molybdate catalysts capable of producing high yields of acrolein at high propylene conversions (>90%) and at low pressures (12). Over the next 30 years much industrial and academic research and development was devoted to improving these catalysts, which are used in the production processes for acrolein, acryUc acid, and acrylonitrile. AH commercial acrolein manufacturing processes known today are based on propylene oxidation and use bismuth molybdate based catalysts. 

Patents claiming specific catalysts and processes for thek use in each of the two reactions have been assigned to Japan Catalytic (45,47—49), Sohio (50), Toyo Soda (51), Rohm and Haas (52), Sumitomo (53), BASF (54), Mitsubishi Petrochemical (56,57), Celanese (55), and others. The catalysts used for these reactions remain based on bismuth molybdate for the first stage and molybdenum vanadium oxides for the second stage, but improvements in minor component composition and catalyst preparation have resulted in yields that can reach the 85—90% range and lifetimes of several years under optimum conditions. Since plants operate under more productive conditions than those optimum for yield and life, the economically most attractive yields and productive lifetimes maybe somewhat lower. 

Although acrylonitrile manufacture from propylene and ammonia was first patented in 1949 (30), it was not until 1959, when Sohio developed a catalyst capable of producing acrylonitrile with high selectivity, that commercial manufacture from propylene became economically viable (1). Production improvements over the past 30 years have stemmed largely from development of several generations of increasingly more efficient catalysts. These catalysts are multicomponent mixed metal oxides mostly based on bismuth—molybdenum oxide. Other types of catalysts that have been used commercially are based on iron—antimony oxide, uranium—antimony oxide, and tellurium-molybdenum oxide. 

The propylene-based process developed by Sohio was able to displace all other commercial production technologies because of its substantial advantage in overall production costs, primarily due to lower raw material costs. Raw material costs less by-product credits account for about 60% of the total acrylonitrile production cost for a world-scale plant. The process has remained economically advantaged over other process technologies since the first commercial plant in 1960 because of the higher acrylonitrile yields resulting from the introduction of improved commercial catalysts. Reported per-pass conversions of propylene to acrylonitrile have increased from about 65% to over 80% (28,68—70). 

Addition of Hydrogen Cyanide. At one time the predominant commercial route to acrylonitrile was the addition of hydrogen cyanide to acetylene. The reaction can be conducted in the Hquid (CuCl catalyst) or gas phase (basic catalyst at 400 to 600°C). This route has been completely replaced by the ammoxidation of propylene (SOHIO process) (see Acrylonitrile). 

Oxidation Catalysis. The multiple oxidation states available in molybdenum oxide species make these exceUent catalysts in oxidation reactions. The oxidation of methanol (qv) to formaldehyde (qv) is generally carried out commercially on mixed ferric molybdate—molybdenum trioxide catalysts. The oxidation of propylene (qv) to acrolein (77) and the ammoxidation of propylene to acrylonitrile (qv) (78) are each carried out over bismuth—molybdenum oxide catalyst systems. The latter (Sohio) process produces in excess of 3.6 x 10 t/yr of acrylonitrile, which finds use in the production of fibers (qv), elastomers (qv), and water-soluble polymers. 

Two synthesis processes account for most of the hydrogen cyanide produced. The dominant commercial process for direct production of hydrogen cyanide is based on classic technology (23—32) involving the reaction of ammonia, methane (natural gas), and air over a platinum catalyst it is called the Andmssow process. The second process involves the reaction of ammonia and methane and is called the BlausAure-Methan-Ammoniak (BMA) process (30,33—35) it was developed by Degussa in Germany. Hydrogen cyanide is also obtained as a by-product in the manufacture of acrylonitrile (qv) by the ammoxidation of propjiene (Sohio process). 

Acrylonitrile. Acrylonitrile is produced by reacting propylene, ammonia, and owgeu (air) in a single flmdized bed of a complex catalyst. Known as the SOHIO process, this process was first operated commercially in 1960. In addition to acrylonitrile, significant quantities of HCN and acetonitrile are also produced. This process is also exothermic. Temperature control is achieved by raising steam inside vertical tubes immersed in the bed [Veatch, Hydrocarbon Proce.ss. Pet. Refiner, 41, 18 (November 1962)]. 

Transition metal oxides or their combinations with metal oxides from the lower row 5 a elements were found to be effective catalysts for the oxidation of propene to acrolein. Examples of commercially used catalysts are supported CuO (used in the Shell process) and Bi203/Mo03 (used in the Sohio process). In both processes, the reaction is carried out at temperature and pressure ranges of 300-360°C and 1-2 atmospheres. In the Sohio process, a mixture of propylene, air, and steam is introduced to the reactor. The hot effluent is quenched to cool the product mixture and to remove the gases. Acrylic acid, a by-product from the oxidation reaction, is separated in a stripping tower where the acrolein-acetaldehyde mixture enters as an overhead stream. Acrolein is then separated from acetaldehyde in a solvent extraction tower. Finally, acrolein is distilled and the solvent recycled. 

Ammoxidation illustrates several principles. First, it shows the benefit of telescoping two successive processes into one reactor. The Sohio inventor, James D. Idol, Jr., observed that catalysts for two successive stages in an earlier ammoxidation procedure were very similar. He then found that the same catalyst could be used for both, thus eliminating a complete plant stage, at great saving of capital and operating cost ... 

Invented and developed independently in the late 1950s by D.G. Stewart in the Distillers Company, and R. Grasselli in Standard Oil of Ohio. The former used a tin/antimony oxide catalyst the latter bismuth phosphomolybdate on silica. Today, a proprietary catalyst containing depleted uranium is used. See also Erdolchemie, OSW, Sohio. 

The Sohio technology is based on a catalyst of bismuth an4 molybdenum oxides. Subsequent catalyst improvements came from the use of bismuth phosphomolybdate on a silica gel, and more recently, antimony-uranium oxides. Each change in catalyst was motivated Jby a higher conversion rate per pass to acrylonitrile. 

Acrolein is needed industrially on a great scale, and to obtain it selectively from propene and O2 various different heterogeneous catalysts have been investigated. In 1957-1962 Standard Oil of Ohio (SOHIO) developed the Mo03/Bi203-catalyst system [1,2], that did not lead to a high propene conversion but yielded a fairly good selectivity. Furthermore, acrylonitrile can be obtained instead of acrolein if NH3 is added to the system (ammonoxidation of propene, Eq. 1). 

Oxidation in the original Sohio process941,942 was carried out over a bismuth molybdate catalyst, which was later superseded by bismuth phosphomolybdate with various amounts of additional metal ions (Ce, Co, Ni), and multicomponent metal oxides based on Mo, Fe, and Bi supported on silica. 

Practically complete conversion of propylene and ammonia is achieved to produce acrylonitrile in 65-70% yield. Acetonitrile and HCN are the main byproducts. The Sohio process originally used oxides of Bi, Co, and Mo, and bismuth and cobalt molybdates.898,915,941,953 Other catalysts developed later (uranyl antimonate antimony oxide-iron oxide oxides of Fe, Ce, and Mo mixed oxides of Sb and Sn)898,915,939,953,955,956 produce fewer byproducts and ensure higher yields of acrylonitrile. 

Catalytic oxidation of propylene to acrolein was first discovered by the Shell group in 1948 on Cu20 catalyst (/). Both oxidation and ammoxidation were industrialized by the epoch-making discovery of bismuth molybdate catalyst by SOHIO (2-4). The bismuth molybdate catalyst was first reported in the form of a heteropoly compound supported on Si02, Bi P,Mo,2052/Si02 having Keggin structure but it was not the sole active species for the reactions. Several kinds of binary oxides between molybdenum trioxide and bismuth oxide have been known, as shown in the phase... 

In the 1960s, a number of binary oxides, including molybdenum, tellurium, and antimony, were found to be active for the reactions and some of them were actually used in commercial reactors. Typical commercial catalysts are Fe-Sb-O by Nitto Chemical Ind. Co. (62 -64) and U-Sb-O by SOHIO (65-67), and the former is still industrially used for the ammoxidation of propylene after repeated improvements. Several investigations were reported for the iron-antimony (68-72) and antimony-uranium oxide catalysts (73-75), but more investigations were directed at the bismuth molybdate catalysts. The accumulated investigations for these simple binary oxide catalysts are summarized in the preceding reviews (5-8). 

The ammoxidation of propene to acrylonitrile is of great industrial importance and accordingly the literature is abundant. The reaction is very similar to the oxidation of propene to acrylonitrile and carried out at the same conditions and over the same kind of catalysts. The famous bismuth phosphomolybdate catalyst developed by Sohio was the first of a series of highly effective mixed-oxide catalysts. The optimum yields are generally obtained at temperatures of 400—500°C. Initial selectivities over 95% and yields up to 80% are feasible. The superior selectivity of the ammoxida-... 

In 1959, Idol (2), and in 1962, Callahan et al. (2) reported that bismuth/molybdenum catalysts produced acrolein from propylene in higher yields than that obtained in the cuprous oxide system. The authors also found that the bismuth/molybdenum catalysts produced butadiene from butene and, probably more importantly, observed that a mixture of propylene, ammonia, and air yielded acrylonitrile. The bismuth/molybdenum catalysts now more commonly known as bismuth molybdate catalysts were brought to commercial realization by the Standard Oil of Ohio Company (SOHIO), and the vapor-phase oxidation and ammoxidation processes which they developed are now utilized worldwide. 

Shortly after the introduction of the bismuth molybdate catalysts, SOHIO developed and commercialized an even more selective catalyst, the uranium antimonate system (4). At about the same time, Distillers Company, Ltd. developed an oxidation catalyst which was a combination of tin and antimony oxides (5). These earlier catalyst systems have essentially been replaced on a commercial scale by multicomponent catalysts which were introduced in 1970 by SOHIO. As their name implies, these catalysts contain a number of elements, the most commonly reported being nickel, cobalt, iron, bismuth, molybdenum, potassium, manganese, and silica (6-8). 

A redox mechanism for oxidation catalysis was proposed by Mars and van Krevelen (34) for the oxidation of aromatics over V205. This mechanism introduced the concept that lattice oxygen of a reducible metal oxide could serve as a useful oxidizing agent for hydrocarbons. Moreover, it formed the basis for the early work at SOHIO which led to the development of the bismuth molybdate catalyst. Since that time there have been many reports which support the redox concept. 

Mehta (34) has carried out a reactor network optimization study to find improved designs for the production of acrylonitrile in a collaboration between UMIST and one of its industrial partners. Most industrial installations employ fluidized-bed reactors (BP/Sohio process) with a well-mixed reaction zone. Previous process improvements have mainly resulted from better catalysts, which have produced an increase in yield from 58% to around 80%. The reaction model employed in the optimization study is taken from Ref. 81 and considers seven reactions and eight components. Air, pure oxygen, and propylene are available as raw material streams. The optimization study assumes negligible pressure drop along the reaction sections, isothermal and isobaric operation, and negligible mass gas-solid transfer effects. 

The Standard Oil Company of Ohio or SOHIO (now BP Amoco) developed and commercialized in 1960 a fluidized bed process in which the catalytic oxidation of a mixture of propylene and ammonia produced acrylonitrile (ACRN). By-products from this reaction are HCN and acetonitrile. The yields of HCN depend on the process conditions and on the catalyst system131. The reactions are ... 

---