Social capital theory

A key proposition of the social capital theory of turnover costs is that turnover reduces the level of collective goal focus and shared trust (Leana and van Buren 1999). Thus a vacancy which has prompted the employment of a new employee will have had a negative impact on tmst within the workplace. The same argument can be applied when a new employee is acquired due to an increased need for human capital. Therefore there is always going to be a tmst development process associated with the arrival of a new employee. The new employee will develop more or less tmst in management, supervisors and co-workers, and management, supervisors and co-workers will develop more or less tmst in the new employee (Jeffcott et al. 2006). A new employee will also develop more or less tmst in the systems and processes of the organization, as well as in the equipment they are asked to use to complete their work. 

The starting point for Luxemburg s investigation is the reproduction of the total social capital. Karl Marx made a contribution of lasting service to the theory of economics when he drew attention to the problem of the reproduction of the entire social capital (Luxemburg 1951 31). The historically specific cornerstone of capitalist reproduction is that it requires the formation of profits ... 

Woolcock. M. (1998) Social capital and economic development towards a theoretical synthesis and policy. Theory and Society 27, 151-249. 

Chiu, C. M., Hsu, M. H., and Wang, E. T. G. (2006), "Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities an integration of social capital and sodal cognitive theories," Decision Support Systems, 42 (3), 1872-88. 

When discussing these limitations, associated with little interest in social capital on the basis of the theory and practice of supply chain management, it is worth analysing all dimensions of social capital affecting supply chain management. This means that it is necessary to refer to both the macroeconomic approach to social capital, wherein it constitutes external conditioning of supply chain operation, and the microeconomic approach (social capital of the supply chain itself and individual companies), in which social capital forms a part of internal supply chain potential. 

Just as economic analysis usually omits the influence of social capital on the stability of market exchange, the theory of supply chain... 

As the deliberations presented herein show, a supply chain s social capital is not much discussed in theory or applied in business practice. It seems that tradition and the effective promotion of the macroeconomic approach to social capital have dominated the application of any relevant theories in practice in the public sector. This is probably why social capital is regarded by business environments as an unknown and uncontrollable external factor of company and supply chain operation. A similar situation is found with respect to the social capital of companies. It was concluded, too quickly and easily, that this invisible resource of individual organisations could not be accurately measured, and that one could therefore not influence its structure or level in order to adjust it to the needs of supply chain management. 

Practice theory is drawn from the work of Pierre Bourdieu (1977), rooted in the disciplines of sociology and anthropology. This approach allows us to focus on individuals and their positions in different institutional contexts for example, how much cultural and symbolic capital they bring with them into engineering. Many students forge important relationships that allow them to gain the social currency, or social capital, necessary to traverse... 

The first part of this book deals with problems that today are studied by philosophers and economists. The second part is more closely related to history, sociology and political science. The distinction is largely one of convenience, yet sufficiently robust to provide a useful way of organizing the subject-matter. It can be stated rather starkly as follows. In this first part I discuss Marx s analysis and indictment of capitalism as an economic system, and the ideal of communist society which is constantly present in the background. In the second part, social change and collective action form the focus of attention, mainly but not exclusively with a view to understanding Marx s theory of the transition from capitalism to communism. To be sure, these dynamic problems are also treated in the first part, notably in the discussion of capitalist crises (3.4), but they take second place to an equilibrium analysis of capitalism and a normative assessment of what it does to human beings. 

In this section 1 discuss Marx s theory of social relations their real nature and their distorted appearance in capitalist society. In 2.3.1 1 first set out, with little reference to Marx, a general theory of social relations. This will also prove useful for the analysis of exploitation and class in later chapters. In 2.3.21 turn to Marx s theory of fetishism, that is the view that under capitalism the social relations between men appear as natural properties of objects. In 2.3.31 finally survey what, following Plamenatz, I call "social alienation" - the fact that the products of human activity may take on an independent and even hostile form uis-d-nis their creators. 

In 2.3,3 I argued that Marx attempted to demonstrate a connection between three major flaws of capitalism exploitation, alienation and the social contradiction" involved in the falling rate of profit. In the passage just quoted he also tries to link the last of these with the more general thesis of historical materialism, that all modes of production come to an end because of a contradiction between the productive forces and the relations of production. Clearly, the forging of such a link would be highly desirable. In its absence, historical materialism and the economic theory of capitalism would remain separate bodies of analysis, each of them offering an explanation of the downfall of capitalism unrelated to that proposed by the other. ... 

The claim that the needs and means of production "coerce" the relations of production into the capitalist mould remains obscure. It certainly cannot mean that capitalism is necessary for the further development of the productive forces. This, while no doubt part of Marx s view, does not enter into his explanation of the rise of capitalism - except at the level of general theory, as in the 1859 Preface. In the more detailed discussions of the emergence of capitalism, he argues that the real subsumption of labour under capital, with the concomitant development of the productive forces, was a mere, non-explanatory by-product of the process. Later, I suggest an interpretation of the first part of the passage, where Marx says that the introduction of capitalism is possible only at a certain level of social production. Here I emphasize the latter part, which leaves little doubt that the emergence of capitalist relations occurred prior to, and independently of, the development of the productive forces. 

Schumpeter remarks somewhere that Marx was the most erudite econo mist of his time, and any reader of the Theories of Surplus-Value can attest to the enormous energy he devoted to the study of his predecessors. As noted several times, this was not only or even mainly out of a scholarly interest for their views, as explanations to be compared with his own. He saw their views as integral parts of the development of capitalism, not merely as theories of capitalism. Hence he systematically tried to link the successive economic doctrines to changes in economic and social struc ture. More precisely, each doctrine corresponds to a specific class at a specific stage in the development of capitalism. The correspondence pertains partly to the interest and partly to the position of the class in question. There is no general mechanism that operates in all cases. 

---