Single Reactions Conversion Problem

In a single reaction (where selectivity is not a problem), the usual choice of excess reactant is to eliminate the component which is more difficult to separate in the downstream separation system. Alternatively, if one of the components is more hazardous (as is chlorine in this example), again we try to ensure complete conversion. 

When the density varies, we need to find another variable to express the progress of a reaction. Earlier we defined the fractional conversion X for a single reaction, and in this chapter we defined the conversion of a reactant species for reactant A and Xj for reaction j. For the conversion in a reaction we need a different variable, and we shall use Xj (bold type), with the index i describing the reaction. We will first work our series and parallel reactions with these variables and then consider a variable-density problem. 

Amongst hydrocarbon oxidations, the liquid phase oxidation of cyclohexane is of immediate interest. It is a typical example of this class of reactions and has considerable industrial importance, especially in the nylon industry. The oxidation of cyclohexane produces cyclohexanol, cyclohexanone and adipic acid, the raw materials for the manufacture of nylon 6 and nylon 6,6. Problems normally encountered in this reaction are those of selectivity. Single stage conversion has to be kept low to avoid over-oxidation and the production of large quantities of unwanted by-products. 

We shall consider only the most elementary formulations of optimal design and avoid the heavy mathematics that is often associated with the more sophisticated problems. For a single reaction, the basic problem is to get as large a conversion in as short a reactor as possible. For simultaneous reactions, the problem is to get as good a yield of the main product as possible. 

The following example concerning the rate of esterification of butanol and acetic acid in the liquid phase illustrates the design problem of predicting the time-conversion relationship for an isothermal, single-reaction, batch reactor. 

Let us return, however, to the problem of optimizing total conversion and selectivity. To begin with, it is important to note the relation between the two functions. For a single reaction there is no problem optimum operation is the maximum production rate of the product per unit mass of catalyst. For plug-flow reactions the mass balance of reactant is given by Eq. (12-1), which may be rearranged to the form... 

Simultaneous minimization of (1) reaction time, (2) polydispersity index for desired value of monomer conversion and (3) degree of polymerization. Weighting method The resulting single objective optimization problem was solved by SQP, GA and a hybrid of the two. Based on more than 100 optimization runs, all the three methods were concluded to be trustworthy. Curteanu et al (2006)... 

If only a single electron-withdrawing substituent is present, as with simple ketones, esters, and nitriles, the formation of alkyl derivatives in high yield requires careful control of reaction conditions. Use of bases that are strong enough to effect only partial conversion of the substrate to its anion can result in aldol-condensation reactions with ketones and Claisen condensations with esters (see Chapter 2 for discussion of these reactions). This problem can be partially avoided by use of very strong bases such as the amide, hydride, or triphenylmethyl anions. 

Incorporation of nonvolatile monomers, such as the sulfonated monomers, can be a problem. The sulfonated monomers must be converted to a soluble form such as the amine salt. Nonvolatile monomers are difficult to recover or purge from the reaction medium. Monomer recovery systems based on carbon adsorption have been developed. However, the usual practice is to maximize the single-pass conversion of these monomers. 

Thus, from the given relation tig = 14 ), we are able to calculate 2 and then the solution proceeds as before. However, the reader cannot consider this relation together with a given rate of reaction or conversion as two independent relations. To make this point even clearer, let us consider the same problem but with five flow rates unknown (meaning it is a six unknowns problem because of the single reaction) (Fig. 2.11). 

Because for given feed conditions, the output conditions (for the case of a single reaction) are completely defined in terms of one and only one variable (conversion of any reactant, or yield of any product, or rate of reaetion of any component), then only one relation related to these variables or one relation relating the output variables together can be used in the solution of the problem (and in the determination of the degrees of freedom). 

In the previous section, we have seen that, for a single reaetion, the rates of reaction for different components can all be expressed in terms of the rate of reaction of one component (together with the stoichiometric numbers), or the conversion of one of the reactants, or the yield of one of the produets (of course, together with the stoichiometric numbers). These information and relations for the single reaction are adequate for the solution of any mass balance problem with a single reaction and can be easily extended to multiple reaction systems, as will be shown later. However, in this section, we will try to make the calculations even more systematic. This will require, first, that we introduce the sign convention for the stoichiometric numbers, as we... 

In spite of the numerous publications showing the potential of such periodic operations especially in the field of complex reactions, experimental studies are virtually non-existent. Of the few experimental works, Renken et al. ( ) compared the performance of a tubular reactor in which a single reaction, the hydrogenation of ethylene, took place, under periodic operation and at steady-state. He reported an improvement of 60% in conversion. In another publication, Renken et al. (3) showed experimentally that periodic operation can be used to eliminate the temperature problems associated with highly exothermic reactions, e.g. the oxidation of ethylene over a silver catalyst. In other experimental work Unni et al. W) showed that periodic variation of reactant composition improved the rate of oxidation of SO2 over a vanadium oxide by as much as 30%. Denis and Kabel ( 5) studied the cyclic operation of a heterogeneous reactor for the vapour phase dehydration of ethanol and observed that adsorption/desorption played a predominant role in the transients of the system. 

The variable that describes composition in Eqn. (3-5) is Nu the total moles of species i . It sometimes is more convenient to work problems in terms of either the extent of reaction or the fractional conversion of a reactant, usually the limiting reactant. Extent of reaction is very convenient for problems where more than one reaction takes place. Fractional conversion is convenient for single-reaction problems, hut can he a source of confusion in problems that involve multiple reactions. The use of all three compositional variables, moles (or molar flow rates), fractional conversion, and extent of reaction, wiU be illustrated in this chapter, and in Chapter 4. 

Two types of problem arise in multiple-reaction systems. The first is analogous to the kind of problem associated with single reactions. In this category are questions such as Given a system of reactions with known kinetics, what reaction time (or space time) will be required to obtain a specified concentration of reactant or product, and what concentrations of the other species will exist at this time Another example is the converse of this question, i.e., what reactant and product concentrations will result for a specified reaction time (or space time) ... 

If the production of vinyl chloride could be reduced to a single step, such as dkect chlorine substitution for hydrogen in ethylene or oxychlorination/cracking of ethylene to vinyl chloride, a major improvement over the traditional balanced process would be realized. The Hterature is filled with a variety of catalysts and processes for single-step manufacture of vinyl chloride (136—138). None has been commercialized because of the high temperatures, corrosive environments, and insufficient reaction selectivities so far encountered. Substitution of lower cost ethane or methane for ethylene in the manufacture of vinyl chloride has also been investigated. The Lummus-Transcat process (139), for instance, proposes a molten oxychlorination catalyst at 450—500°C to react ethane with chlorine to make vinyl chloride dkecfly. However, ethane conversion and selectivity to vinyl chloride are too low (30% and less than 40%, respectively) to make this process competitive. Numerous other catalysts and processes have been patented as weU, but none has been commercialized owing to problems with temperature, corrosion, and/or product selectivity (140—144). Because of the potential payback, however, this is a very active area of research. 

An obvious drawback in RCM-based synthesis of unsaturated macrocyclic natural compounds is the lack of control over the newly formed double bond. The products formed are usually obtained as mixture of ( /Z)-isomers with the (E)-isomer dominating in most cases. The best solution for this problem might be a sequence of RCAM followed by (E)- or (Z)-selective partial reduction. Until now, alkyne metathesis has remained in the shadow of alkene-based metathesis reactions. One of the reasons maybe the lack of commercially available catalysts for this type of reaction. When alkyne metathesis as a new synthetic tool was reviewed in early 1999 [184], there existed only a single report disclosed by Fiirstner s laboratory [185] on the RCAM-based conversion of functionalized diynes to triple-bonded 12- to 28-membered macrocycles with the concomitant expulsion of 2-butyne (cf Fig. 3a). These reactions were catalyzed by Schrock s tungsten-carbyne complex G. Since then, Furstner and coworkers have achieved a series of natural product syntheses, which seem to establish RCAM followed by partial reduction to (Z)- or (E)-cycloalkenes as a useful macrocyclization alternative to RCM. As work up to early 2000, including the development of alternative alkyne metathesis catalysts, is competently covered in Fiirstner s excellent review [2a], we will concentrate here only on the most recent natural product syntheses, which were all achieved by Fiirstner s team. 

If a reaction that must be investigated follows a reaction sequence as in Scheme 10.1, and if the reaction order for the substrate equals unity, it means that (with reference to Eq. (4 b)), the observed rate constant (k0bs) is a complex term. Without further information, a conclusion about the single constants k2 and fCM is not possible. Conversely, from the limiting case of a zero-order reaction, the Michaelis constant cannot be determined for the substrate. For particular questions such as the reliable comparison of activity of various catalytic systems, however, both parameters are necessary. If they are not known, the comparison of catalyst activities for given experimental conditions can produce totally false results. This problem is described in more detail for an example of asymmetric hydrogenation (see below). 

---