Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Silica surface coverage

Fig. 7. Evolution of the specific surface areas of the S13TMSx and TSOTMSx silica samples (measured at 63°C, using IGC-CF and Si2) with the silica surface coverage ratios by the TMS groups. Fig. 7. Evolution of the specific surface areas of the S13TMSx and TSOTMSx silica samples (measured at 63°C, using IGC-CF and Si2) with the silica surface coverage ratios by the TMS groups.
Mixes of S13TMSx and T30TMSx silylated silicas and a silicone oil (Wacker-Chemie AKIOOO) were submitted to dynamic rheological measurements using an oscillating cone/plane rheometer. In Fig. 14, the evolution of the viscosity, measured at 25°C and 0.278 Hz, with the silica surface coverage ratio is shown. [Pg.788]

Raman spectroscopy has provided information on catalytically active transition metal oxide species (e. g. V, Nb, Cr, Mo, W, and Re) present on the surface of different oxide supports (e.g. alumina, titania, zirconia, niobia, and silica). The structures of the surface metal oxide species were reflected in the terminal M=0 and bridging M-O-M vibrations. The location of the surface metal oxide species on the oxide supports was determined by monitoring the specific surface hydroxyls of the support that were being titrated. The surface coverage of the metal oxide species on the oxide supports could be quantitatively obtained, because at monolayer coverage all the reactive surface hydroxyls were titrated and additional metal oxide resulted in the formation of crystalline metal oxide particles. The nature of surface Lewis and Bronsted acid sites in supported metal oxide catalysts has been determined by adsorbing probe mole-... [Pg.261]

Fig. 18. Yield strengths in three-point bend tests of highly filled composites of polyfvinyl butyral) and silica particles treated with methylsilane and octylsilane coupling agents to varying degrees of surface coverage vs. work of adhesion measured independently using IGC. Redrawn from ref. [90]. Fig. 18. Yield strengths in three-point bend tests of highly filled composites of polyfvinyl butyral) and silica particles treated with methylsilane and octylsilane coupling agents to varying degrees of surface coverage vs. work of adhesion measured independently using IGC. Redrawn from ref. [90].
Protein-Pak packings are designed for the size exclusion chromatography of proteins and related compounds. They are based on silica, which is deactivated with glycidylpropylsilane. The diol function prevents the interaction of the target analytes with the silica surface. However, because coverage of the silica surface is always incomplete, residual acidic silanols can interact with the analytes. For this reason, most applications are carried out with a salt concentration above 0.2 mol/liter, which eliminates the interaction of analytes with surface silanols. Protein-Pak packings are stable from pH 2 to pH 8. [Pg.328]

First, they compared CSPs 1 and 3 prepared by the two-step solid-phase methodology with their commercially available counterparts (CSPs 2 and 4) obtained by direct reaction of the preformed selector with a silica support. Although no exact data characterizing the surface coverage density for these phases were reported, all of the CSPs separated all four racemates tested equally. These results shown in Table 3-3 subsequently led to the preparation of a series of dipeptide and tripeptide CSPs 5-10 using a similar synthetic approach. Although the majority of these phases exhibited selectivities lower or similar to those of selectors built around a single amino acid (Table 3-3), this study demonstrated that the solid-phase synthesis was a... [Pg.71]

In a sense each monolithic column is unique, or produced as a product of a separate batch, because the columns are prepared one by one by a process including monolith formation, column fabrication, and chemical modification. Reproducibility of Chro-molith columns has been examined, and found to be similar to particle-packed-silica-based columns of different batches (Kele and Guiochon, 2002). Surface coverage of a Chromolith reversed-phase (RP) column appears to be nearly maximum, but greater silanol effects were found for basic compounds and ionized amines in buffered and nonbuffered mobile phases than advanced particle-packed columns prepared from high purity silica (McCalley, 2002). Small differences were observed between monolithic silica columns derived from TMOS and those from silane mixtures for planarity in solute structure as well as polar interactions (Kobayashi et al., 2004). [Pg.157]

In common with some other authors (18-20), Napper removed excess stabilizer from the dispersion medium so as to give the dispersed particles full surface coverage, leaving negligible amounts of free polymer in solution. As the solvency was worsened, no more polymer could be adsorbed, so that critical flocculation conditions do not necessarily correspond to surface saturation. In the present work, which may refer more closely with some practical applications, the stabilizer is kept at the plateau adsorption level but at the expense of complicating the system by the presence of free polymer. Clarke and Vincent (21) have reported on the effect of free polystyrene on the stability of silica with terminally-attached sytrene chains, but the very considerable differences to our studies make an assessment of the possible role played by unadsorbed polymer unproductive. [Pg.315]

Analysis of the surface coverage revealed an average of 0.4 ionic liquid fragments nm 2, corresponding to the involvement of approximately 35% of all the hydroxyl groups of the pre-treated silica gel. [Pg.203]

Amino-terminated organosilanes were used to immobilize rifamycin B via its active carboxylic acid functionality leading to the formation of stable amide bonds between antibiotics and modified silica [7]. The organosilanes used were (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane or (3-aminopropyl)dimethylethoxysilane, and the procedure for preparation was as described in Section 2.2.1.1. Surface coverage data were not provided by the authors [7],... [Pg.125]


See other pages where Silica surface coverage is mentioned: [Pg.942]    [Pg.951]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.942]    [Pg.951]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.587]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.686]    [Pg.687]    [Pg.713]    [Pg.855]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.430]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.125]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.144 ]




SEARCH



Silica surfaces

© 2024 chempedia.info