Sieves choice

Direct interception refers to a sieve-type mechanism in which contaminants larger than the filter pore size are directly trapped by the filter. This sieve retention mechanism of particle arrest is the mechanism of choice and occurs owing to geometric or spatial restraint. This type of particle arrest is considered to be absolute, that is, it is independent of filtration conditions. 

However, ia some cases, the answer is not clear. A variety of factors need to be taken iato consideration before a clear choice emerges. Eor example, UOP s Molex and IsoSiv processes are used to separate normal paraffins from non-normals and aromatics ia feedstocks containing C —C2Q hydrocarbons, and both processes use molecular sieve adsorbents. However, Molex operates ia simulated moving-bed mode ia Hquid phase, and IsoSiv operates ia gas phase, with temperature swiag desorption by a displacement fluid. The foUowiag comparison of UOP s Molex and IsoSiv processes iadicates some of the primary factors that are often used ia decision making ... 

The efficiency ranking of desiccants in drying air is not always the same as that observed in drying other materials. Other materials may interact with the desiccants to reduce drying effectiveness. From a study of the efficiency of some 25 desiccants for drying several families of laboratory solvents and reagents it was concluded that molecular sieves are the desiccants of choice in most cases (9—17). 

Commercial preparations of these supports are available in narrow mesh-range fractions to obtain particles of uniform size the material should be sieved to the desired particle size range and repeatedly water floated to remove fine particles which contribute to excessive pressure drop in the final column. To a good approximation the height equivalent of a theoretical plate is proportional to the average particle diameter so that theoretically the smallest possible particles should be preferred in terms of column efficiency. Decreasing particle size will, however, rapidly increase the gas pressure necessary to achieve flow through the column and in practice the best choice is 80/100 mesh for a... 

The preferred choice of a water-selective membrane up to now has been hydrophilic membranes because of their high water affinity. However, recently Kuhn et al. reported an all-silica DDR membrane for dehydration of ethanol and methanol with high fluxes (up to 20kg m h ) and high selectivities (H20/ethanol 1500 and H20/methanol 70 at 373 K) in pervaporation operation. The separation is based on molecular sieving with water fluxes comparable to well-performing hydrophilic membranes [51]. 

The choice of proper gel concentration (%T) is, of course, critical to the success of the separation because it heavily influences separation. Too high %T can lead to exclusion of proteins from the gel, and too low %T can decrease sieving (see Figure 8.4). One approach, useful with the McLellan continuous buffers (Table 8.1), is to use relatively large-pore gels (6%T or 7%T) and to alter mobilities with pH. An approach for discontinuous systems is to start with a... 

Finally, one aspect that can pay a role in compositional studies is the sieve (screening) analysis. Like all petroleum products, sampling is, or can be, a major issue. If not performed correctly and poor sampling is the result, erroneous and very misleading data can be produced by the analytical method of choice. For this reason, reference is made to standard procedures such as the Standard Practice for Collection and Preparation of Coke Samples for Laboratory Analysis (ASTM D346) and the Standards Test Method for the Sieve Analysis of Coke (ASTM D293). 

When a more acidic oxide is needed, amorphous silica-alumina as weU as meso-porous molecular sieves (MCM-41) are the most common choices. According to quantum chemical calculations, the Bronsted acid sites of binary sihca-alumina are bridged hydroxyl groups (=Si-OH-Al) and water molecules coordinated on a trigonal aluminum atom [63]. Si MAS NMR, TPD-NH3 and pyridine adsorption studies indicate that the surface chemistry of MCM-41 strongly resembles that of an amorphous sihca-alumina however, MCM-41 has a very regular structure [64, 65],... 

The primary contaminants in commercial THF are water and organic peroxides (THF is notoriously prone to peroxide formation and should not be exposed to air after purification). Molecular sieves reduce the water content to 28 ppm [52] but do not destroy peroxides. Modern organic laboratories typically purify THF by distillation from sodium benzophenone ketyl under a nitrogen atmosphere, which has the virtue of destroying both peroxides and water [63]. This is the method of choice for obtaining high-quality THF. 

---