Shell Model limitations

Witlox, H. W. M., 1993, Thermodynamics Model for Mixing of Moist Air with Pollutant Consisting of HF, Ideal Gas, and Water, Shell Research Limited, Thornton Research Center, TNER.93.021,. 

As is obvious from the table, Tc is almost doubled upon deuteration. These isotope effects are one of the largest observed in any solid state system. The question arises about isotope effects in non-hydrogen-bonded ferro- and antiferroelectrics. As already mentioned in the Introduction, within a mean-field scheme and in a purely ionic model it was predicted that these systems should not exhibit any isotope effect in the classical limit, which has been verified experimentally. Correspondingly, there was not much effort to look for these effects here. However, using a nonlinear shell-model representation it was predicted that in the quantum limit an isotope effect should... 

This agrees with all previous results as far as the first term is concerned. The second constant term 0.3863 is very close to Broersma s 0.38 (73) and to the value 0.392 obtained by Broomfield et al. (76) from their shell-model theory, which is essentially a limiting case of the Kikwood-Riseman theory (77) for the bead model of flexible chains. However, these values are about 0.3 smaller than the corresponding term in Eq. (D-5). This implies that if the ellipsoid model and the continuous string model are applied to the same experimental data for as a function of M, the former should lead to a d value which is about i.35 times larger than that obtained by the latter. On the other hand, both models should give an identical value for ML. 

The simple shell model is very robust and is even successful in describing nuclei at the limits of stability. For example,1 Li is the heaviest bound lithium isotope. The shell model diagram for this nucleus is indicated in Figure 6.5. Notice the prediction... 

Equations [28] and [29] correspond directly to Eqs. [7] and [6], but for the case of dipoles with finite extent. In that sense, models based on point dipoles can be seen as idealized versions of the shell model, in the limit of infinitely small dipoles. That is, the magnitude of the charges qi and spring constants ki approach infinity in such a way as to keep the atomic polarizabilities a, constant. Indeed, in that limit, the displacements will approach zero in the shell model, and the two models will be entirely equivalent. 

As mentioned earlier, the shell model is closely related to those based on polarizable point dipoles in the limit of vanishingly small shell displacements, they are electrostatically equivalent. Important differences appear, however, when these electrostatic models are coupled to the nonelectrostatic components of a potential function. In particular, these interactions are the nonelectrostatic repulsion and van der Waals interactions—short-range interactions that are modeled collectively with a variety of functional forms. Point dipole-and EE-based models of molecular systems often use the Lennard-Jones potential. On the other hand, shell-based models frequently use the Buckingham or Born-Mayer potentials, especially when ionic systems are being modeled. 

Computations of minimum-energy configurations for some off-centre systems were first carried out on the basis of polarizable rigid-ion models, mainly devoted to KChLi" " [95,167-169]. Van Winsum et al. [170] computed potential wells using a polarizable point-ion model and a simple shell model. Catlow et al. used a shell model with newly derived interionic potentials [171-174]. Hess used a deformation-dipole model with single-ion parameters [175]. At the best of our knowledge, only very limited ab initio calculations (mainly Hartree-Fock or pair potential) have been performed on these systems [176,177]. 

For the r-process the models for calculating /3-decay rates can again be divided into microscopic and statistical categories. Among the microscopic ones shell model is of limited use as this involves very neutron-rich nuclei all over the periodic table. Beyond the /p-shell nuclei shell model has been applied to nuclei with either a few valence particles or with more particles but with not too many valence orbits. The microscopic theory that has been widely used is the Random Phase Approximation (RPA) and its different improved version. We refer here to the review by Arnould, Goriely and Takahashi [39] for a detailed description and references. The effective nucleon-nucleon interaction is often taken to be of the spin-isospin type ([Pg.205]

Presently, the widely used post-Hartree-Fock approaches to the correlation problem in molecular electronic structure calculations are basically of two kinds, namely, those of variational and those of perturbative nature. The former are typified by various configuration interaction (Cl) or shell-model methods, and employ the linear Ansatz for the wave function in the spirit of Ritz variation principle (c/, e.g. Ref. [21]). However, since the dimension of the Cl problem rapidly increases with increasing size of the system and size of the atomic orbital (AO) basis set employed (see, e.g. the so-called Paldus-Weyl dimension formula [22,23]), one has to rely in actual applications on truncated Cl expansions (referred to as a limited Cl), despite the fact that these expansions are slowly convergent, even when based on the optimal natural orbitals (NOs). Unfortunately, such limited Cl expansions (usually truncated at the doubly excited level relative to the IPM reference, resulting in the CISD method) are unable to properly describe the so-called dynamic correlation, which requires that higher than doubly excited configurations be taken into account. Moreover, the energies obtained with the limited Cl method are not size-extensive. 

Since both these models represent extended systems, the exploitation of the shell-model or Cl-type variational methods was a priori excluded. This placed emphasis on the development of perturbative approaches for this type of problem. It was soon realized that the most efficient methodological approach must be based on a mathematical formalism that was originally developed in quantum field theory. Moreover, in view of the extended character of the studied systems, it was absolutely essential that the method employed yields energies that are linearly proportional to the particle number N in the system or, in today s parlance, that it must be size extensive, so that the limiting procedure when N->-oo makes sense. In terms of MBPT, this imphes that only the connected or finked energy terms be present in the perturbation series, a requirement that automatically leads to the Rayleigh-Schrodinger PT. 

Our refined shell model of the Ne atom has the 10 electrons distributed in three different energy levels 2 electrons in a Is level, 2 electrons in a 2s level, and 6 electrons in a 2p level. At this point we will not be concerned about the details of the differences between the 2s and 2p levels. The important point is that the 2s level is slightly lower in energy than the 2p, but not by a large amount. This suggests that the electrons in both levels of the = 2 shell are at nearly the same distance from the nucleus, and are clearly much farther from the nucleus than the electrons in the = 1 shell. Also, we have found that there appears to be a limit of 2 on the number of electrons that can be placed in an s sub shell. 

The scattering function describing the time-dependent scattering intensity of micelles in a KZAC experiment involves a time-dependent core-shell model where the contrast is a function of the fraction of chains exchanged, /exc- Here, we shall limit the discussion to cylindrical and spherical structures using simple A-B diblock copolymers as an example. Inclusion of other structures such as vesicles could be shghtly more comphcated because the microscopic composition might be potentially different in the inner and outer shells. 

---