Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Setup carry-over

One option to deal with the situation is to neglect setup times and setup carryover. This results in a situation, in which the available capacity is overestimated. On the other hand, if setup times are modeled, but setup carry-overs are not in the scope of the model formulation, the available capacity would be underestimated. Both results are not satisfactory in the first situation plans will result which are too optimistic and not feasible, whereas in the second situation in which capacity estimation is too conservative, resources will be underutilized. Consequently, only a model formulation which takes setup times and setup carry-overs into account captures the characteristics of the real world adequately and provides a realistic capacity allocation. [Pg.243]

After having motivated the importance of coupling the production of adjacent periods via setup carry-over, now the lot size itself will be focused on. In the chemical industry, production quantities are often constrained such that a lower and/or upper bound is imposed on a continuous production run or that production has to be... [Pg.243]

The main objective of PP/DS optimization is the building of campaigns taking into account inventories and setup costs. Additional objectives in this scenario are the minimization of delays with respect to the due dates given by the SNP optimization run as well as the selection of suitable resources. The PP/DS optimizer is based on a genetic algorithm. As setup carry-overs have been modeled already in the upper planning level, PP/DS receives input that will yield a consistent plan. [Pg.259]

Finally, an important characteristic identified in chemical production processes are time-consuming and costly setup operations. Thus, the representation of time is a critical issue in the modeling of chemical production processes. Three fundamental deficiencies of the representation result if continuous processes are modeled by standard bucket-oriented lot-sizing models. These are the carry-over of setup states... [Pg.242]

The first issue, a setup state carry-over between adjacent periods, is depicted in Figure 11.3. On a continuous time scale a sequence of five products (A to E) can be modeled straightforwardly. However, if the same is to be done in a bucket-oriented setting some difficulties arise. Production within a bucket is coupled with a corresponding setup operation which causes a lot of problems. [Pg.243]

Porkka, P., Vepsalainen, A.P.J. and Kuula, M. (2003) Multiperiod production planning carrying over setup time. Int. f. Product. Res., 41, 1133-1148. [Pg.260]

Whenever this kind of activity becomes part of the manufacturing plan, the benefits of the setup-dominant process will be realized. This results because the quality standard, formed by the development function in the performance qualification, is carried over to the production setting. When production then incorporates this standard into its own operating procedures, the quality standard becomes a measurable criterion for performance. This example thus clearly shows how this phase of PV would be a QA tool for auditing. [Pg.790]

A comprehensive test of computational protocols applied for the short time dynamics of the photolysed Mb-CO complex is presented by Meller and Elber [110]. 270 different 10 ps molecular dynamics simulations were carried out using two different solvation boxes, two differenc types of electrostatic cutoffs and two different treatments of the photodissociated ligand. In addition, both the wild-type and the Leu29Phe mutant were treated. 9 different setups were combined from the variables described and 30 trajectories were generated for all. Results presented are averages over these 30 trajectories. Calculations were performed using a combination of the AMBER [111] and OPES [112] force fields, the heme model of Kuczera et al. [16] and approximately 2700 TIP3P... [Pg.77]

The ability to remove or isolate an intact mammalian organ or tissue from a host and maintain the organ in a viable state by perfusion of the vascular bed with blood or a suitable substitute is not a new technique. Experiments of this nature were carried out in the seventeenth century. Over the last 50 years, many systems have been described for the perfusion of numerous organs in various species. The major differences between the published models deal with the types of perfusate, the mechanical setup used to deliver the perfusates, and the surgical protocols used to isolate the organs [1—4]. [Pg.460]

In an evaluation of the setup, pentane hydroisomerization at temperatures up to 300°C over different zeolite based catalysts Pt-MOR was carried out. The catalysts had been pretreated at different temperatures, ranging from 300°C to 800°C. As expected, pre-calcination at intermediate temperature between 500 and 600°C produced the most active catalysts. At lower temperatures autoreduction of platinum and generation of the H-form of the zeolite are... [Pg.175]

The gum Arabica powder specimen (SI) was collected from Merk (India) and was subjected to a sol-gel process along with pure water so that the polysaccharide host chain could form more complex higher polymers over those in normal powder form. Next, the sol specimens are extracted at initial state 30, 60, and 120 minutes. The experimental specimens (S2, S3, S4, and S5 respectively) were developed by adequate drying of the sols at environmental condition. The developed gum Arabica specimens (S2-S5) are supposed to exhibit a change in molecular structure over that in SI due to prolongation of the sol gel process. FTIR analysis on pure gum Arabica was carried out to examine its molecular structure and dynamical information. The analysis was carried out at high resolution FTIR setup in a KBr window (shown in Figure 12.14). [Pg.339]

This example illustratively shows that inorganic materials are well suited for continuous flow processes in column-like reactors. Thus, covalently immobilized NH-benzyl-(li, 2S)-(-)-norephedrine 10 on silica inside a column was doped with ruthenium. This setup was used to carry out continuous asymmetric transfer hydrogenation reactions (Scheme 10) [38]. Remarkably,no catalyst deactivation occurred over a period of one week, which the authors ascribed to the successful site isolation of the catalyst on the support. [Pg.222]


See other pages where Setup carry-over is mentioned: [Pg.243]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.438]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.462]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.419]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.711]    [Pg.469]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.764]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.1424]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.1139]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.225]    [Pg.397]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.9]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.243 ]




SEARCH



Carri

Carrie

Carry

Carry-over

Setup

© 2024 chempedia.info