Separation techniques analyte/matrix

Particulate interferents can be separated from dissolved analytes by filtration, using a filter whose pore size retains the interferent. This separation technique is important in the analysis of many natural waters, for which the presence of suspended solids may interfere in the analysis. Filtration also can be used to isolate analytes present as solid particulates from dissolved ions in the sample matrix. For example, this is a necessary step in gravimetry, in which the analyte is isolated as a precipitate. A more detailed description of the types of available filters is found in the discussion of precipitation gravimetry and particulate gravimetry in Chapter 8. 

Two frequently encountered analytical problems are (1) the presence of matrix components interfering with the analysis of the analyte and (2) the presence of analytes at concentrations too small to analyze accurately. We have seen how a separation can be used to solve the former problem. Interestingly, separation techniques can often be used to solve the second problem as well. For separations in which a complete recovery of the analyte is desired, it may be possible to transfer the analyte in a manner that increases its concentration. This step in an analytical procedure is known as a preconcentration. 

Until this point, the sample preparation techniques under discussion have relied upon differences in polarity to separate the analyte and the sample matrix in contrast, ultraflltration and on-line dialysis rely upon differences in molecular size between the analyte and matrix components to effect a separation. In ultrafiltration, a centrifugal force is applied across a membrane filter which has a molecular weight cut-off intended to isolate the analyte from larger matrix components. Furusawa incorporated an ultrafiltration step into his separation of sulfadimethoxine from chicken tissue extracts. Some cleanup of the sample extract may be necessary prior to ultrafiltration, or the ultrafiltration membranes can become clogged and ineffective. Also, one must ensure that the choice of membrane filter for ultrafiltration is appropriate in terms of both the molecular weight cut-off and compatibility with the extraction solvent used. 

Once the analyte has been separated from the matrix in LC, the best approach to the detection of the molecule must be determined. This section will discuss the detection techniques of ultraviolet/visible (UVA IS), fluorescence (FL), and electrochemical (EC) detection, with MS being addressed separately in Section 4.2. When deciding on the most appropriate detector for an LC separation, the appropriate chemical data on the analyte should be collected by using a spectrophotometer, fluorimeter, and potentiometer. 

The separation of analytes from undesirable matrix components, or cleanup , of sample extracts can be accomplished through a variety of techniques that take advantage of differences in the physicochemical properties of the analytes from co-extracted matrix components. 

Modifiers can be used very effectively in on-line SFE-GC to determine the concentration levels of the respective analytes. This presents an advantage in terms of the use of modifiers in SFE, since they appear as solvent peaks in GC separations and do not interfere with the target analyte determination. Although online SFE-GC is a simple technique, its applicability to real-life samples is limited compared to off-line SFE-GC. As a result, on-line SFE-GC requires suitable sample selection and appropriate setting of extraction conditions. If the goal is to determine the profile or matrix composition of a sample, it is required to use the fluid at the maximum solubility. For trace analysis it is best to choose a condition that separates the analytes from the matrix without interference. However, present SFE-GC techniques are not useful for samples... 

Reported concentrations of chromium in open ocean waters range from 0.07 to 0.96 xg/l with a preponderance of values near the lower limit. Methods used for the determination of chromium at this concentration have generally used some form of matrix separation and analyte concentration prior to determination [170-173], electroreduction [174,175] and ion exchange techniques [176,177]. 

At present, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry provides a unique, powerful alternative for the determination of rare earths in natural samples [638,639]. Nevertheless, its application to the determination of rare earths at ultratrace concentration level in seawater is limited, because highly saline samples can cause both spectral interferences and matrix effects [640]. Therefore, a separation of the matrix components and preconcentration of the analytes are prerequisites. To achieve this goal, many preconcentration techniques have been used, including coprecipitation with... 

If it were possible to identify or quantitatively determine any element or compound by simple measurement no matter what its concentration or the complexity of the matrix, separation techniques would be of no value to the analytical chemist. Most procedures fall short of this ideal because of interference with the required measurement by other constituents of the sample. Many techniques for separating and concentrating the species of interest have thus been devised. Such techniques are aimed at exploiting differences in physico-chemical properties between the various components of a mixture. Volatility, solubility, charge, molecular size, shape and polarity are the most useful in this respect. A change of phase, as occurs during distillation, or the formation of a new phase, as in precipitation, can provide a simple means of isolating a desired component. Usually, however, more complex separation procedures are required for multi-component samples. Most depend on the selective transfer of materials between two immiscible phases. The most widely used techniques and the phase systems associated with them are summarized in Table 4.1. 

GC is one of the most widely applied instrumental techniques. The basis requirement is that the analyte(s) be volatile under conditions within the gas chromatograph and that they be separated from nonvolatile matrix components. Misunderstanding of volatility and vapor pressure is the most common misconception about GC many users... 

Selectivity The method you choose must be selective enough to measure the analyte of interest in what may be a complicated matrix. Frequently, not one method is selective enough, and a separation technique must be used before the determination step. Selectivity is a continuum from highly selective to completely non-specific for a given analyte. Different degrees of selectivity can be achieved in different ways (Table 21.7). 

In matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD) the sample is mixed with a suitable powdered solid-phase until a homogeneous dry, free flowing powder is obtained with the sample dispersed over the entire material. A wide variety of solid-phase materials can be used, but for the non-ionic surfactants usually a reversed-phase C18 type of sorbent is applied. The mixture is subsequently (usually dry) packed into a glass column. Next, the analytes of interest are eluted with a suitable solvent or solvent mixture. The competition between reversed-phase hydrophobic chains in the dispersed solid-phase and the solvents results in separation of lipids from analytes. Separation of analytes and interfering substances can also be achieved if polarity differences are present. The MSPD technique has been proven to be successful for a variety of matrices and a wide range of compounds [43], thanks to its sequential extraction matrices analysed include fish tissues [44,45] as well as other diverse materials [46,47]. 

The determination of volatile elemental species in biological or environmental samples, such as body fluids, tissues, soils, plants or water, generally requires a careful preconcentration and clean-up procedure in order to separate the analytes from matrix material. Several existing sample preparation procedures and applied measurement techniques (especially GC-ICP-MS in combination with... 

In most field analysis in which separation techniques are the main difficulties, the traceability chain could not be accomplished easily by the use of calibration standards of a simple matrix. Consequently, either the validation of analytical methods or calibration by complex matrix reference materials is required. However, unless the process is clearly described with corresponding uncertainty, the validation process becomes a bottleneck for establishing a traceable measurement. Then, in most applications, the role of CRMs of a similar matrix becomes crucial in the quality of measurements. 

Despite the remarkable sensitivity of modern instrumental detection techniques, analysis of environmental water samples nearly always requires enrichment of the analytes. This, together with separation from the matrix, are the two main functions of sample preparation appropriate sample preparation techniques address both issues at the same time, while striving to impose as few restrictions as possible on the subsequent instrumental determination (separation and detection). Sample preparation is strongly dependent on the nature of the analyte and the matrix, particularly with regard to its volatility and polarity. Figure 13.8 gives a general overview of common sample preparation (enrichment) techniques for aqueous and other matrices. 

The use and development of high-resolving separation techniques as well as highly accurate mass spectrometers is nowadays essential to solve the proteome complexity. Currently, more than a single electrophoretic or chromatographic step is used to separate the thousands of proteins found in a biological sample. This separation step is followed by analysis of the isolated proteins (or peptides) by mass spectrometry (MS) via the so-called soft ionization techniques, such as electrospray ionization (ESI) and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) combined with the everyday more powerful mass spectrometers. Two fundamental analytical strategies can be employed the bottom-up and the top-down approach. 

---