Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Semiempirical theory

Neumann and co-workers have used the term engulfrnent to describe what can happen when a foreign particle is overtaken by an advancing interface such as that between a freezing solid and its melt. This effect arises in floatation processes described in Section Xni-4A. Experiments studying engulfrnent have been useful to test semiempirical theories for interfacial tensions [25-27] and have been used to estimate the surface tension of cells [28] and the interfacial tension between ice and water [29]. [Pg.352]

On a different note, after some 50 years of intensive research on high-pressure shock compression, there are still many outstanding problems that cannot be solved. For example, it is not possible to predict ab initio the time scales of the shock-transition process or the thermophysical and mechanical properties of condensed media under shock compression. For the most part, these properties must presently be evaluated experimentally for incorporation into semiempirical theories. To realize the potential of truly predictive capabilities, it will be necessary to develop first-principles theories that have robust predictive capability. This will require critical examination of the fundamental postulates and assumptions used to interpret shock-compression processes. For example, it is usually assumed that a steady state is achieved immediately after the shock-transition process. However, due to the fact that... [Pg.357]

The semiempirical theory underlying this equation can be extended to describe blast overpressure decay. If acoustic behavior is assumed, results can be framed in the following expression for blast overpressure as a function of distance from the blast center. [Pg.134]

Figure 13.5 An application of a hybrid MO/MO philosophy to the indicated RNA trimer proceeds using correlated levels of electronic structure theory for various tautomers and protonation states of the central base pair, this parr then representing the small system in the MO/MO analog of Eq. (13.6), and semiempirical theory for both die small system and the frozen-geometry larger system... [Pg.472]

The most common procedure is that of semiempirical theory, which treats Hi as a parameter assumed reasonably constant for a given series of compounds. For example, in the case of aromatic hydrocarbons, each carbon atom is in a similar state and contributes one orbital (a 2orbital with its nodal plane corresponding to the molecular plane) to the above linear combination. Hiickel theory applied to these compounds assumes... [Pg.10]

For polyatomic gases, with rotational and vibrational degrees of freedom, Eq. 3.138 is not sufficiently accurate. Quite a number of theories have been developed to predict thermal conductivity, given the viscosity. The earliest is due to A. Eucken (1913), which is a semiempirical theory developed to accommodate polyatomic gases ... [Pg.100]

Although semiempirical theories make some rather drastic approximations (e.g., the ZDO approximation), the use of empirical parameters partially compensates for these approximations, and allows the theories to give useful results for molecules too large to treat accurately by ab initio methods. For details of two-electron semiempirical theories, see Murrell and Harget, Pople and Beveridge. [Pg.43]

The bulk of evidence points to the first limiting model as most appropriate for use in treating photochemical transformations. The theory as developed by Robinson and Frosch18 will be used as a basis of our discussion. However, we must bear in mind that other approaches to analysis of the rate process may produce results having different form. This reservation is important because we are seeking only a formalism for use in correlation of experimental results and perhaps to provide a basis for semiempirical theory. Such applications are unlikely to provide any very discriminating test of the theory so revision of the form is most likely to come from ab initio review of the model. [Pg.381]

In some polymer-nonpolar solvent systems, % has been calculated as a function of concentration on the basis of the statistical-thermodynamical theory called the equation of state theory [13,14]. This semiempirical theory takes into account not only the interaction between solute and solvent, but also the characteristics of pure substances through the equations of state of each component. At present, however, we cannot apply this approach to such a complex case as the NIPA-water system. Thus, at the present stage, we must regard % as an empirical parameter to be determined through a comparison between calculated and experimental results. The empirical estimation of % for the NIPA-water system will be described in the next section. [Pg.8]

A third implementation of QM is density functional theory (DFT) (43 45), and it is useful in both molecular and materials applications. Density functional theory has the advantage of being roughly intermediate in speed and accuracy between ab initio and semiempirical theories. Optimized geometries from DFT can be quite good. For these reasons, use of DFT by chemists is increasing. The 1998 Nobel Prize in Chemistry recognized Professors Walter Kohn and John Pople, proponents of DFT and ab initio theory, respectively. [Pg.369]

We have seen three broad techniques for calculating the geometries and energies of molecules molecular mechanics (Chapter 3), ab initio methods (Chapter 5), and semiempirical methods (Chapters 4 and 6). Molecular mechanics is based on a balls-and-springs model of molecules. Ab initio methods are based on the subtler model of the quantum mechanical molecule, which we treat mathematically starting with the Schrodinger equation. Semiempirical methods, from simpler ones like the Hiickel and extended Hiickel theories (Chapter 4) to the more complex SCF semiempirical theories (Chapter 6), are also based on the Schrodinger equation, and in fact their empirical aspect comes from the desire to avoid the mathematical... [Pg.445]

Another question one may have is Where do I see the antibonding character in the ) VB state Here too, use of the semiempirical theory in Chapter 3 and the rules for taking matrix elements between VB determinants, will show that the matrix element between the two ionic determinants is 2(35, where (3 and 5 are the corresponding resonance and overlap integrals between the two AOs of the H atoms. As such, the negative combination of the ionic configurations... [Pg.195]

Use the semiempirical theory in Chapter 3 to obtain quantitative expressions for the energies and wave functions of the l Ag and 2 Ag states of butadiene. Hint Express the energies of the two Rumer structures relative to the QC determinant (the spin alternant determinant). Deduce the matrix element between the structures keeping only the close neighbor 2(35 term (for simplicity define X = —2(35). Neglect overlap in the normalization constant. [Pg.215]

The highly specific behavior of transition metal complexes has prompted numerous attempts to access this Holy Grail of the semi-empirical theory - the description of TMCs. From the point of view of the standard HFR-based semiempirical theory, the main obstacle is the number of integrals involving the d- AOs of the metal atoms to be taken into consideration. The attempts to cope with these problems have been documented from the early days of the development of semiempirical quantum chemistry. In the 1970s, Clack and coworkers [78-80] proposed to extend the CNDO and INDO parametrizations by Pople and Beveridge [39] to transition elements. Now this is an extensive sector of semiempirical methods, differing by expedients of parametrizations of the HFR approximation in the valence basis. These are, for example, in methods of ZINDO/1, SAMI, MNDO(d), PM3(tm), PM3 etc. [74,81-86], From the... [Pg.122]

Transition metal complexes (TMCs) represent another, somewhat better known, Holy Grail of the semiempirical theory. The HFR-based semiempirical methods and the DFT-based methods suffer from structure deficiency, which does not allow it to reproduce relative energies of electronic states of different spin multiplicity within their respective frameworks without serious ad hoc assumptions. [Pg.145]


See other pages where Semiempirical theory is mentioned: [Pg.269]    [Pg.419]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.442]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.467]    [Pg.474]    [Pg.400]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.122]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.167 , Pg.181 ]




SEARCH



Computational efficiency semiempirical molecular orbital theory

Density functional theory semiempirical form

Fock matrix semiempirical molecular orbital theory

Hartree-Fock theory semiempirical

Hydrogen bonding, semiempirical molecular orbital theory

Integral approximation, semiempirical molecular orbital theory

MNDO approximation, semiempirical molecular orbital theory

Molecular orbital theory semiempirical

Molecular orbital theory semiempirical methods

Ongoing Developments in Semiempirical MO Theory

Pariser-Parr-Pople theories, semiempirical

Quantum mechanics, semiempirical molecular orbital theory

Semiempirical

Semiempirical MO theory

Semiempirical electronic structure theory

Semiempirical molecular orbital theory applications

Semiempirical molecular orbital theory available approaches

Semiempirical molecular orbital theory current theories

Semiempirical molecular orbital theory mechanical hybrids

Semiempirical molecular orbital theory parametrizations

Valence states semiempirical molecular orbital theory

© 2024 chempedia.info