Molecular mechanics molecules

Z-matriccs arc commonly used as input to quantum mechanical ab initio and serai-empirical) calculations as they properly describe the spatial arrangement of the atoms of a molecule. Note that there is no explicit information on the connectivity present in the Z-matrix, as there is, c.g., in a connection table, but quantum mechanics derives the bonding and non-bonding intramolecular interactions from the molecular electronic wavefunction, starting from atomic wavefiinctions and a crude 3D structure. In contrast to that, most of the molecular mechanics packages require the initial molecular geometry as 3D Cartesian coordinates plus the connection table, as they have to assign appropriate force constants and potentials to each atom and each bond in order to relax and optimi-/e the molecular structure. Furthermore, Cartesian coordinates are preferable to internal coordinates if the spatial situations of ensembles of different molecules have to be compared. Of course, both representations are interconvertible. 

Figure 7-8. Bonded (upper row) and non-bonded (lower row) contributions to a typioal molecular mechanics force field potential energy function. The latter two types of Interactions can also occur within the same molecule.

Many problems in force field investigations arise from the calculation of Coulomb interactions with fixed charges, thereby neglecting possible mutual polarization. With that obvious drawback in mind, Ulrich Sternberg developed the COSMOS (Computer Simulation of Molecular Structures) force field [30], which extends a classical molecular mechanics force field by serai-empirical charge calculation based on bond polarization theory [31, 32]. This approach has the advantage that the atomic charges depend on the three-dimensional structure of the molecule. Parts of the functional form of COSMOS were taken from the PIMM force field of Lindner et al., which combines self-consistent field theory for r-orbitals ( nr-SCF) with molecular mechanics [33, 34]. 

I. Pettersson, T. Liljefors, Molecular mechanics calculated conformational energies of organic molecules a comparison of force fields, in Reviews in Computational Chemistry, Vbl. 9,... 

For many applications, especially studies on enzyme reaction mechanisms, we do not need to treat the entire system quantum mechanically. It is often sufficient to treat the center of interest (e.g., the active site and the reacting molecules) quantum mechanically. The rest of the molecule can be treated using classical molecular mechanics (MM see Section 7.2). The quantum mechanical technique can be ab-initio, DFT or semi-empirical. Many such techniques have been proposed and have been reviewed and classified by Thiel and co-workers [50] Two effects of the MM environment must be incorporated into the quantum mechanical system. 

Molecular mechanics calculations are a very useful tool for the spatial and energetic description of small molecules as well as macroscopic systems like proteins or DMA. 

A descriptor for the 3D arrangement of atoms in a molceulc can be derived in a similar manner. The Cartesian coordinates of the atoms in a molecule can be calculated by semi-empirical quantum mechanical or molecular mechanics (force field) methods, For larger data sets, fast 3D structure generators are available that combine data- and rule-driven methods to calculate Cartesian coordinates from the connection table of a molecule (e.g., CORINA [10]). 

The classical introduction to molecular mechanics calculations. The authors describe common components of force fields, parameterization methods, and molecular mechanics computational methods. Discusses th e application of molecular mechanics to molecules comm on in organic,and biochemistry. Several chapters deal w ith thermodynamic and chemical reaction calculations. 

The accuracy of a molecular mechanics or seim-eni pineal quantum mechanics method depends on the database used to parameterize the method. This is true for the type of molecules and the physical and chemical data in the database. Frequently, these methods give the best results for a limited class of molecules or phen omen a. A disad van tage of these methods is that you m u si have parameters available before running a calculation. Developing param eiers is time-consuming. 

To limit a molecular mechanics calculation to part of a molecule, select the atom s ofin terest. On ly the selected atom s can m ove, but the other (frozen) atoms mfhience the calc illation. 

Molecular mechanics force fields have much information built into them and can be accurate for the molecules used in their param eten/ation. For molecules outside the limited scope for 40. Dewar. J. S. Dicier, K. M../. Am. Chem. Soc. 108 807. ), 1086. 

An N-atom molecular system may he described by dX Cartesian coordinates. Six independent coordinates (five for linear molecules, three fora single atom) describe translation and rotation of the system as a whole. The remaining coordinates describe the nioleciiUir configuration and the internal structure. Whether you use molecular mechanics, quantum mechanics, or a specific computational method (AMBER, CXDO. etc.), yon can ask for the energy of the system at a specified configuration. This is called a single poin t calculation. ... 

It is always possible to convert internal to Cartesian coordinates and vice versa. However, one coordinate system is usually preferred for a given application. Internal coordinates can usefully describe the relationship between the atoms in a single molecule, but Cartesian coordinates may be more appropriate when describing a collection of discrete molecules. Internal coordinates are commonly used as input to quantum mechanics programs, whereas calculations using molecular mechanics are usually done in Cartesian coordinates. The total number of coordinates that must be specified in the internal coordinate system is six fewer... 

J G 1994. Extended Electron Distributions Applied to the Molecular Mechanics of Some termolecular Interactions. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design 8 653-668. el A and M Karplus 1972. Calculation of Ground and Excited State Potential Surfaces of anjugated Molecules. 1. Formulation and Parameterisation. Journal of the American Chemical Society 1 5612-5622. 

---