Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

SEM operation

Electrons of 30 keV energy do not penetrate far into the surface of the specimen. Unless the irradiated material evaporates, so that the beam drills a hole in the sample, the unaffected bulk holds the damaged thin surface layer in place and the effect on the image is limited to fine scale details. To reduce these effects, the thickness of the surface layer that is irradiated should be reduced. Either the metal coating can be made thicker or the accelerating voltage reduced. Both [Pg.36]

Items (1) and (2) on this list were discussed above. Items (3) and (4) are to limit the radiation dose as much as possible, by reducing the number of incident electrons and spreading them out over a large area. The last item is to make the radiation more effective, by stopping it unless data is being collected. [Pg.37]

minimum beam current and exposure time that has low enough noise  [Pg.52]


As time goes on, the ultimate resolution of the SEM operated in these modes will probably level out near 1 nm. The major growth of SEMs now seems to be in the development of specialized instruments. An environmental SEM has been developed that uses differential pumping to permit the observation of specimens at higher pressures. Photographs of the formation of ice crystals have been taken and the instrument has particular application to samples that are not vacuum compatible, such as biological samples. [Pg.83]

Figure 4.9 SEM image ofY zeolite taken with field emission SEM, operated atO.SkV. Sample prep was by dispersing powder in isopropyl alcohol and placing a droplet of the... Figure 4.9 SEM image ofY zeolite taken with field emission SEM, operated atO.SkV. Sample prep was by dispersing powder in isopropyl alcohol and placing a droplet of the...
The morphology was determined using a Quanta-200 3D scanning electron microscope (SEM) operated at an accelerating voltage of 1200 V. The sample (0.5 mg) was moimted onto a 5 x 5 mm silicon wafer affixed via graphite tape to an aluminum stub. The powder was then sputter-coated for 105 s at a beam current of 20 mA/dm with a 100-A layer of gold/palladium alloy. [Pg.46]

Given a specimen with surface fracture features with high differences up to 50 /tm, how do you select SEM operation parameters to ensure the whole field is in focus ... [Pg.144]

Some of the samples were annealed at 650 °C for one horn. The microscopic measurements were performed in a combined SEM/STM system based on a Leica 440 SEM operating under a vacuum of 1 x 10 Ton. The small size of the STM enabled it to be mounted on the SEM specimen holder. Mechanically sharpened Pt-Ir wires were used as probe tips for tunneling experiments. The STM was used in the conventional constant-current mode, in the current imaging tuimeling mode (CITS) and in the STM - REBIC mode. For STM-REBIC mode, two ohmic contacts were provided by small Hgin dots on the sample surface connected to Au or Pt-Ir wires. The tuimel tip was located on the region between the contacts and the current was measured at room temperature with a Keithley 428 current amplifier. [Pg.476]

SEM Operating Conditions, Counting, Fiber Type Determination... [Pg.153]

The samples, fibers and fractured composites surfaces were placed in a holder with the aid of carbon tape and subjected to metallic coating by gold to a thickness of 8 nm under an argon atmosphere using the Bal-Tec MED 020 metal coating equipment. The metallic samples were subjected to microscopic analysis in a LEO 440 SEM operating at 20 kW and using a secondary electron detector. [Pg.109]

Form MMS-131, Performance Measures Data, is not new, but prior to SEMS, operators were not obliged to submit it to the MMS. Now, under the SEMS rule, they must do so, starting on March 31, 2011. Data from voluntarily submitted forms were used to create the safety trends shown in Figure 1.1. [Pg.204]

The Center for Offshore Safety (COS) has provided three SEMS Operator-Contractor Agreement Letter Templates. Each template has a different focus, but they all provide a structure for an agreement between an operator and a contractor. An extract from the second of the three templates is provided in Table 6.8 below. [Pg.220]

The major issues to consider in the optimization of SEM operation for stable specimens are noise, depth of field and resolution. Parameters the operator can vary are the beam voltage, beam current, final aperture size and working distance. Standard conditions for maximum resolution are ... [Pg.29]

The major issues to consider in optimization of SEM operation for stable specimens are noise. [Pg.26]

In order to observe their intenral pore structure, foams are cut with a razor blade. The sections are mounted on an aluminum stub with a carbon adhesive and then coated with platinum (120 sec. Argon atmosphere). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is performed with a Jeol JSM-840A SEM operating at an accelraating voltage of 20kV. [Pg.682]

A Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (FE-SEM) operated at 15 keV produces images with a spatial resolution of 1 nm (electrons have a mass of 9.109 X 10 g). [Pg.293]

Secondary electron images were taken with JEOL JSM-6360 LV SEM operated at acceleration voltage 15 kV. SEM samples were prepared by fracturing injection moulded test bar in liquid nitrogen. Approximately 20 nm thick gold layer was sputtered on the sample. [Pg.94]


See other pages where SEM operation is mentioned: [Pg.125]    [Pg.696]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.593]    [Pg.563]    [Pg.572]    [Pg.3093]    [Pg.439]    [Pg.685]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.841]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.28]   


SEARCH



Operating procedures SEMS requirements

Operating procedures, SEMS

Operating procedures, SEMS Section

© 2024 chempedia.info