Selection of a Model

We should clearly understand that every conceptual picture or model for the progress of reaction comes with its mathematical representation, its rate equation. Consequently, if we choose a model we must accept its rate equation, and vice versa. If a model corresponds closely to what really takes place, then its rate expression will closely predict and describe the actual kinetics if a model differs widely from reality, then its kinetic expressions will be useless. We must remember that the most elegant and high-powered mathematical analysis based on a model which does not match reality is worthless for the engineer who must make design predictions. What we say here about a model holds not only in deriving kinetic expressions but in all areas of engineering. 

The requirement for a good engineering model is that it be the closest representation of reality which can be treated without too many mathematical complexities. It is of little use to select a model which very closely mirrors reality but which is so complicated that we cannot do anything with it. Unfortunately, in today s age of computers, this all too often happens. 

For the noncatalytic reaction of particles with surrounding fluid, we consider two simple idealized models, the progressive-conversion model and the shrinking unreacted-core model. 

Progressive-Conversion Model (PCM). Here we visualize that reactant gas enters and reacts throughout the particle at all times, most likely at different rates at different locations within the particle. Thus, solid reactant is converted continuously and progressively throughout the particle as shown in Fig. 25.2. 

Shrinking-Core Model (SCM). Here we visualize that reaction occurs first at the outer skin of the particle. The zone of reaction then moves into the solid, leaving behind completely converted material and inert solid. We refer to these as ash. Thus, at any time there exists an unreacted core of material which shrinks in size during reaction, as shown in Fig. 25.3. 

---

It is not currently possible to examine the configuration of the adsorbed species unambiguously. However, since thermodynamic arguments do not require a specific model at the molecular level, it is still possible to analyze equilibrium data within a thermodynamic context. Most surface reactions are inferred from experimental observations of reaction stoichiometries and perhaps only in a limited range of T. Consequently, the choice of specific surface species is dependent on two considerations (1) the need to explain the observed measurements in terms of reaction stoichiometries, and (2) the selection of a model to allow the representation of metal/ surface site interaction intensities. 

Photocatalytic systems became a subject of many detailed studies and improvements. A need to compare photocatalytic activity of various materials enforced selection of a model pollutant . Perhaps the most commonly chosen is 4-chloroph-enol (4-CP) [56, 57]. The route of 4-CP oxidation in the presence of excited Ti02 was described in many original and review papers [58-64], The oxidative pathway includes attack of hydroxyl radicals or direct oxidation with a hole leading to... 

Deviation of parameter a from 0.5 in this equation may be caused by volumetric effects in good sol-vents or partial hydrodynamic permeability of the coil, promoted by skeletal rigidity of macromo-lecules. Selection of a model for quantitative estimation of rigidity by these properties is usually complicated by the absence of reliable criterion, especially in the cases, when the value of parame-ter a falls within the range of 0.5 - 0.8. That is why to describe behavior of macromolecules in tolu-ene, the authors [56] have used the model of perturbed Gaussian non-permeable coil and the model of worm-like backbone. 

Several sophisticated techniques and data analysis methodologies have been developed to measure the RTD of industrial reactors (see, for example, Shinnar, 1987). Various different types of models have been developed to interpret RTD data and to use it further to predict the influence of non-ideal behavior on reactor performance (Wen and Fan, 1975). Most of these models use ideal reactors as the building blocks (except the axial dispersion model). Combinations of these ideal reactors with or without by-pass and recycle are used to simulate observed RTD data. To select an appropriate model for a reactor, the actual flow pattern and its dependence on reactor hardware and operating protocol must be known. In the absence of detailed quantitative models to predict the flow patterns, selection of a model is often carried out based on a qualitative understanding of flow patterns and an analysis of observed RTD data. It must be remembered that more than one model may fit the observed RTD data. A general philosophy is to select the simplest model which adequately represents the physical phenomena occurring in the actual reactor. 

The selection of a model for an exchange structure of nickel and oxygen depends to some extent on the relative effective sizes of nickel and oxygen atoms in the surface monolayer. These are probably not the same as those in the interior of a nickel oxide lattice since the bonding and electron transfer are obviously different because of the difference in... 

Algorithm Design. Here, the problem has to be addressed from a computational framework viewpoint. Issues such as selection of a model solution scheme (e.g., choice of a differential equation solver, choices of appropriate modules for random number generation, etc.) are addressed at this stage. 

Analysis of binding data depends on the selection of a model. Since the binding is likely to be nonspecific, sharing also the feature of a ligand binding to a lattice, the models developed for adsorption onto surfaces or lines... 

X-ray powder diffraction data indicate that the unit cell for cellotetraose is triclinic (space group PI) with two tetramers per unit cell. Although there is a small preference for a parallel structure at this stage, similarities between patterns calculated for parallel and antiparallel models make it difficult to choose one over the other. In addition to the rather insensitive R values, the differences in specific reflections in the observed and the calculated patterns for different models may be used as criteria in selection of a model. 

For the QSRR of reversed-phase liquid chromatography, the contact surface area is important, and the selection of a model phase is difficult, but a simple model phase is satisfactory for the measurement of albumin-acidic drug binding affinity in ion-exchange liquid chromatography/ ... 

For selection of a model based on SC, some of the arguments mentioned above recommend the four-descriptor model, such as its minimal differences Sqy - S, and its maximal F. Figure 7.10 is a scatterplot of the calculated vs. experimental boiling points for this model, again containing values from both resubstitution and... 

Before the time of computer simulation, many could counter this criticism by demonstrating that bringing in more complex aspects into a model leads to differential equations that cannot be solved analytically, giving not much room for competence to help to solve a problem. In other words, the availability of solvable model structures was relatively small and the decision process restricted to the selection of a model structure that would best capture the data. However, using computer simulation, the behavior of much more complex models can be studied, which means that carefully taken modeling decisions and explicit assumptions are a key to competent models for real-world situations. 

Carlo Study of the Effect of Ion and Charmel Size on the Selectivity of a Model Calcium Charmel. 

Air quality modeling is necessary to ensure that a source is in compliance with the SIP and New Source Review requirements. When air quality modeling is required, the selection of a model is dependent on the source characteristics, pollutants emitted, terrain, and meteorological parameters. The USEPA s Guideline on Air Quality Modeling (40 CFR 1, Appendix W) summarizes the available models, techniques, and guidance in conducting air... 

Further support realized in Comos PT allows the user to switch between configurations or to create new ones. In order to customize a configuration, the user can override the default mappings, for example to employ a tailored model for a certain process step. The selection of a model for a process step is simplified by a dialogue from which the user can select among the models already available in ROME. 

We will first discuss the pros and cons of the three numerical methods used in the computer models. We must realize at the outset that no one particular computer modeling technique is superior in all applications. Each has its own pros and cons. Selection of a modeling technique will depend on the experience and background of the individuals, or the scope and objective of the modeling efforts. 

---