Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Conversion models

Figure L Solution of kinetic equations for molecjdar weight and LCB development in bulk VAc polymerization. Ms, Mw, and Bs are plotted as a function of conversion. Model predictions Cm = 2.0 X Cp = 3.0 X i0 K == 1.0. Figure L Solution of kinetic equations for molecjdar weight and LCB development in bulk VAc polymerization. Ms, Mw, and Bs are plotted as a function of conversion. Model predictions Cm = 2.0 X Cp = 3.0 X i0 K == 1.0.
For the noncatalytic reaction of particles with surrounding fluid, we consider two simple idealized models, the progressive-conversion model and the shrinking unreacted-core model. [Pg.568]

Progressive-Conversion Model (PCM). Here we visualize that reactant gas enters and reacts throughout the particle at all times, most likely at different rates at different locations within the particle. Thus, solid reactant is converted continuously and progressively throughout the particle as shown in Fig. 25.2. [Pg.568]

Figure 25.2 According to the progressive-conversion model, reaction proceeds continuously throughout the solid particle. Figure 25.2 According to the progressive-conversion model, reaction proceeds continuously throughout the solid particle.
Although the coefficients in the model for both catalysts are slightly different, the functional dependence on H-NMR spectra is identical. The coefficient of determination, R, of the conversion model is 0.94 for both catalysts. Catalyst A gives higher conversion compared to catalyst B at the same cat-to-oil ratio for almost all tested feeds. The exceptions are the heaviest feeds in the set. Figure 12.10a and b shows conversion estimated from H-NMR spectra versus conversion observed for both catalysts A and B. The triangles represent the heaviest feed in the study at three cat-to-oil ratios, 4, 6, and 8. The circles correspond to three different feeds with the... [Pg.187]

In this review article, the functions of polymers and molecular assemblies for solar energy conversion will be described including photochemical conversion models, elemental processes for the conversion such as charge separation, electron transfer, and catalysis for water decomposition, as well as solar cells. [Pg.2]

In the photochemical conversion model (Fig. 3), the most serious problem is the undesired and energy-consuming back electron transfer (shown as dotted arrows) as well as side electron transfer, e.g., the electron transfer from (Q) to (T2)ox. It is almost impossible to prevent these undesired electron transfers, if the reactions are carried out in a homogeneous solution where all the components encounter with each other freely. In order to overcome this problem, the use of heterogeneous conversion systems such as molecular assemblies or polymers has attracted many researchers. The arrangement of the components on a carrier, or the separation of the Tj—Q sites from the T2—C2 ones in a heterogeneous phase must prevent the side reactions of electron transfer. [Pg.5]

These potentials theoretically allow water photolysis. However, multi-electron processes have to occur at the catalyst in order to photolyze water with this complex. The lifetime of the excited state is 650 ns, and the excited state is quenched efficiently through electron transfer with redox reagents. The conversion model with this complex is described in Chapter 4. [Pg.6]

The vector of conversion models a change which takes place in the course of a chemical reaction. It is known from the theory of reaction mechanisms, and also used in quantum chemical studies of chemical reactions, that chemical reaction can be understoo d as a composition of elementary reactions here called Elementary Conversions of Valence States, ECVS. Combinatorially, it is possible to derive ECVS [37, 39, 28], which are also considered in our model. All of them together with their notation and reaction schemes are shown in Table 3. [Pg.146]

Incorporation of chemical conversion models in multiphase flow simulation... [Pg.279]

Fig. 15. Effects of catalyst structural properties and site density on Cs+ selectivity and 1-hexene/n-hexane ratio (experimental Co on Si02, TiOa, and AI2O3 supports 473 K, H2/ CO = 2.1, 2000 kPa, 50-60% Co conversion). Model solid lines. Fig. 15. Effects of catalyst structural properties and site density on Cs+ selectivity and 1-hexene/n-hexane ratio (experimental Co on Si02, TiOa, and AI2O3 supports 473 K, H2/ CO = 2.1, 2000 kPa, 50-60% Co conversion). Model solid lines.
Figure 4. The internal conversion model, k, and k are rate constants for radiationless relaxation, radiative relaxation, and geminate pair production, respectively. (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [18d].)... Figure 4. The internal conversion model, k, and k are rate constants for radiationless relaxation, radiative relaxation, and geminate pair production, respectively. (Reprinted with permission from Ref. [18d].)...
Within the model, a certain number of reactions is combined to a reaction scheme which describes the conversion of the solid fuel. For wood no general conversion model exists, thus the kinetic data is separated from the particle model and managed by a database, allowing an easy exchange of the underlying data. [Pg.588]

The photostabilizing efficiency of A-methyl HAS pNCH3, e.g. 28,29,31, R = CH3,32) is within experimental error comparable to that of secondary HAS I NH [43,111,173,174], The simplest and most logical explanation includes a transformation of NCH3 into NH. Some studies contributed to the mechanism of this conversion. Model A-substituted tetramethylpiperidines having an H-atom on the a-carbon in the A-substituent were found to be photo-oxidized more easily than the corresponding secondary HAS [173]. Besides, the tertiary HAS decomposed /ert-butylhydroperoxide more rapidly than did NH. The reaction rates with terf-butylhydroperoxide at 132 °C were as follows ... [Pg.128]

Fig.8. Nucleated conformational conversion model. S, state protein jagged spheres A-state protein dark, smooth spheres recently converted A-state protein light, smooth spheres. See text for details of the models. Fig.8. Nucleated conformational conversion model. S, state protein jagged spheres A-state protein dark, smooth spheres recently converted A-state protein light, smooth spheres. See text for details of the models.
Conversely, models require more generic environment and release data for screening the evaluation of the chemical fate in regional and nationwide environments. [Pg.97]

B = 1. In this case, the reaction follows the uniform conversion model [31], which indicates that it proceeds under chemical reaction control, and the reactive agent first diffuses through the pore network and later reacts at any internal active site. The particle will retain its initial size during the conversion... [Pg.21]

If conversion of /3-carotene to retinyl ester in the enterocyte were small, it might be a rate-limiting step that could be augmented by hepatic conversion, since the liver also contains the carotenoid-lS,lS -dioxygenase enzyme that catalyzes this process. To test if the compartmental model could predict such system behavior accurately if the liver were the only site for conversion, model parameters were altered so that only intact /3-carotene-ds was absorbed and conversion to retinyl-d4 ester in the enterocyte did not occur. Under these conditions, the compartmental model could not predict the experimental observations because fitting the first /3-carotene-dg peak limited the amount of /3-carotene-dg and retinoid-d4 which was introduced into the system, and thus underestimated either the second /3-carotene-dg peak or the retinoid-d4 peak. It was concluded therefore, that the enterocyte is an important site of conversion of /3-carotene to retinoid. Considerable evidence already exists for conversion of /3-carotene to retinoid in the intestine (Dimitrov et al, 1988 Olson, 1989 Wang et al., 1992 Sdta et aL, 1993). [Pg.39]

The internal computer models must be converted into one another through so-called pie- and postprocessor conversion programs. To minimize the costs of implementing such processors, a standardized conversion model is applied. The conversion models standardized to date are still of limited use because they can only display extracts of an integrated product model. Interfaces such as... [Pg.2840]

The conversational model identifying the activities necessary to complete the learning process (from Laurillard,... [Pg.236]


See other pages where Conversion models is mentioned: [Pg.235]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.570]    [Pg.683]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.3567]    [Pg.3588]    [Pg.3601]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.2575]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.260]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.645 ]




SEARCH



Calculation of Conversion by the Dispersion Model

Conversion According to the Dispersion Model

Conversion According to the Segregated-flow Model

Conversion According to the Series-of-stirred-tanks Model

Conversion according to Axial Dispersion Model

Conversion according to Tanks in Series Model

Conversion model-independent

Electrochemical Models for Biological Energy Conversion

Energies model proteins conversion

Energy conversion, biological model

Explicit model conversion kinetics

Mathematical model conversion predicted

Model catalysts hydrocarbon conversions

Model compound conversion

Model protein studies energy conversions

Parametric modeling study of volatile nitrogen conversion to NO and N2O during biomass combustion

Photochemical Conversion Models

Theoretical Models for Color Conversion

Uniform conversion model

Wind energy conversion model

© 2024 chempedia.info