Surfactant screening

Early researchers turned to foamability or foaminess" measurements to screen surfactants for flow experiments (51). In one variation of this test, a long, vertical glass cylinder with a frit at the bottom was filled with the test solution, and gas was forced through the frit. The height of foam formed in the column was then measured, or, the foam was collected and the amount of liquid in the foam determined (51). In his screening of some 200 materials, Raza measured interfacial tensions of aqueous solutions with respect to air and to oil, and the foamability and foam stability in the absence and presence of oil. The latter experiment consisted simply of shaking the solution in a test tube and measuring the volume of foam at various times (60). 

The objective of this measurement technique is to screen surfactants for their ability to decrease interfacial tension and thereby mobilizing trapped oil. If we confine ourselves to this objective, it is not sufficient to measure the interfacial tension between crude oil and formation water only. More relevant information can be obtained by measuring trends (for example temperature and concentration variations) in the effect of other variables. Using this technique to predict behavior in an oil bearing formation, where we deal with totally different processes, leads to the question what is the real value of measuring ultra low interfacial tension for predicting oil recovery in the reservoir ... 

Veggeland, K. and T. Austad (1993). An evaluation of gel permeation chromatography in screening surfactant/ polymer interaction of coirunercial products in sahne aqueous solutions. Colloids and Surfaces A Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 76 73-80. 

Finally, the most recent development in the field have tried to follow the synthesis or release in the mediiun of molecular mediators of skin irritation such as prostaglandins, interleukins, TNF- (tumor necrosis factor), or other cytokines known to be modulated in vivo by jskin irritation. Such an approach not only screens surfactant-based products on skin irritation but also increases the understanding of the mechanisms of skin irritation. 

The ernes of ionic surfactants are usually depressed by tire addition of inert salts. Electrostatic repulsion between headgroups is screened by tire added electrolyte. This screening effectively makes tire surfactants more hydrophobic and tliis increased hydrophobicity induces micellization at lower concentrations. A linear free energy relationship expressing such a salt effect is given by ... 

Water from screens, cleaners, washers, thickeners, and flotation cells contain relatively high levels of ink. These waters also contain valuable chemicals, ie, sodium hydroxide and surfactants. Recycle of this water can save up to 10% ia chemical costs. 

The function / incorporates the screening effect of the surfactant, and is the surfactant density. The exponent x can be derived from the observation that the total interface area at late times should be proportional to p. In two dimensions, this implies R t) oc 1/ps and hence x = /n. The scaling form (20) was found to describe consistently data from Langevin simulations of systems with conserved order parameter (with n = 1/3) [217], systems which evolve according to hydrodynamic equations (with n = 1/2) [218], and also data from molecular dynamics of a microscopic off-lattice model (with n= 1/2) [155]. The data collapse has not been quite as good in Langevin simulations which include thermal noise [218]. 

More recent publications on sulfosuccinates have confirmed the minimal or close to zero skin and eye irritation caused by these products. In a general screening of product safety evaluation methods the authors [16] rejected the sulfosuccinate from further consideration in the statistical analysis of experimental data (variance analysis) because the product had not shown any irritation in the Duhring-Chamber test. The sulfosuccinate (based on fatty alcohol ethoxy late) was tested in a screening with 14 other surfactants, namely, alkyl sulfates, sulfonates, ether sulfates, and a protein fatty acid condensation product. 

There have been many attempts to relate skin studies with in vitro experimental data. The solubility of Zein in solutions of surfactants is said to be a reliable guide to any effects of anionic surfactants on skin [108,109]. Though the Zein test is not conclusive in all cases, but many development laboratories use this method as a screening tool to avoid expensive developments with unsuitable raw materials. 

Routledge, E.J. and Sumpter, J.P. (1996). Estrogenic activity of surfactants and some of their degradation products assessed using a recombinant yeast screen. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 15, 241-248. 

The colloid probe technique was first applied to the investigation of surfactant adsorption by Rutland and Senden [83]. They investigated the effect of a nonionic surfactant petakis(oxyethylene) dodecyl ether at various concentrations for a silica-silica system. In the absence of surfactant they observed a repulsive interaction at small separation, which inhibited adhesive contact. For a concentration of 2 X 10 M they found a normalized adhesive force of 19 mN/m, which is small compared to similar measurements with SEA and is probably caused by sufactant adsorption s disrupting the hydration force. The adhesive force decreased with time, suggesting that the hydrophobic attraction was being screened by further surfactant adsorption. Thus the authors concluded that adsorption occurs through... 

C. A. Sanz and G. A. Pope. Alcohol-free chemical flooding from surfactant screening to coreflood design. In Proceedings Volume, pages 117-128. SPE Oilfield Chem Int Symp (San Antonio, TX, 2/14-2/17), 1995. 

The excavated soil is removed from the site and screened to remove large solid objects. The screened soil is washed and the washing water is treated.78 Clearly, the washing media used in in situ soil-flushing treatment can be used here. The most common washing medium is water. Surfactants are used to reduce the affinity of contaminants to the soil. 

Both commercial grade and pure nonionic and anionic surfactants have been evaluated by phase inversion and optimal salinity screening procedures to establish relationships to their molecular structures. 

Also, other dependent variables associated with CO2-foam mobility measurements, such as surfactant concentrations and C02 foam fractions have been investigated as well. The surfactants incorporated in this experiment were carefully chosen from the information obtained during the surfactant screening test which was developed in the laboratory. In addition to the mobility measurements, the dynamic adsorption experiment was performed with Baker dolomite. The amount of surfactant adsorbed per gram of rock and the chromatographic time delay factor were studied as a function of surfactant concentration at different flow rates. 

---