Screening of Toxic Chemicals

Laboratory studies have shown a similar relationship for ecological magnification (Lu and Metcalf, 1975) (equation 7). 

It should be noted that these correlations are semiquantitative and may fail for low P values or for chemicals whose speciation is not the same in both phases. 

Information from transport and fate processes can be utilized to screen toxic chemicals as to their environmental behavior using (i) the bench-mark concept and (ii) the structure-activity relationship. 

This concept is based on the correlation of variation of certain biological activities of chemicals with functional substituents on the chemical (Hansch, 1980b). Hansch demonstrated that toxicity of a series of chemicals may be correlated to their log Po and electronic properties of the substituent. In general. 

Since the fate processes controlling the concentrations of chemicals in the environment are dynamic, kinetic and equilibrium-rate constants do describe the contribution of various processes to the net change and rate of change in its concentration. Since chemicals are usually present in low concentrations in the environment, the kinetics are usually first order. The set of simple first- 

---

Haque, R., Falco, J., Cohen, S., Riordan, C. (1980) Role of transport and fate studies in the exposure, assessment and screening of toxic chemicals. In Dynamics, Exposure and Hazard Assessment of Toxic Chemicals. Haque, R., Ed., pp. 47-67, Ann Arbor Sci. Publ., Ann Arbor, MI. 

Identification of stmctures of toxic chemicals in environmental samples requires to use modern analytical methods, such as gas chromatography (GC) with element selective detectors (NPD, FPD, AED), capillary electrophoresis (CE) for screening purposes, gas chromatography/mass-spectrometry (GC/MS), gas chromatography / Fourier transform infra red spectrometry (GC/FTIR), nucleai magnetic resonance (NMR), etc. 

Bioassays can be used for cost-effective biomonitoring and rapid screening of environmental samples to detect the presence of mixtures of toxic chemicals and to identify hot spots. 

Under earlier laws US-EPA had the authority to control toxic substances only after damage had occurred. The earlier laws did not require the screening of toxic substances before they entered the marketplace. TSCA closed the gap in the earlier laws by requiring that the health and environmental effects of all new chemicals be reviewed before they are manufacmred for commercial purposes. TSCA has four titles ... 

As pointed out previously, one of the agenda that has emerged for behavioral toxicity involves the screening of new chemicals for potential neurotoxicity. The behavioral tests utilized for such purposes are often referred to as apical tests because they require the integrated function of several organ systems, including the nervous system. Such batteries typically have included two behavioral components ... 

Recently, alternative toxicity test methods using bacteria or cultured cells instead of biota itself have been developed for the purposes of animal welfare, convenience, cost saving and screening of hazardous chemicals. 

Immunoassays offer a sensitive, specific, cost-effective means of screening many samples for trace residues of toxic chemicals, their metabolites, and adducts. Antibodies can be used both as detectors to quantify the amount of a chemical present and in immunoaffmity chromatography to purify and concentrate material for subsequent analysis. Applications of these assays include detection of pesticide residues, mycotoxins, biomarkers of toxicity, and industrial chemicals. 

Personnel Selection and Training. The quaHty of operating personnel is of paramount importance to the safe operation of a chemical plant. Operators must be intelligent and emotionally stable. Excessive use of alcohol and dmgs affects reHabiHty and can thereby render workers more susceptible to certain types of toxic exposure. Thorough medical screening is essential to avoid damaging exposures to susceptible individuals, eg, people with respiratory ailments should not be employed in areas where corrosive atmospheres could occur. 

Approaches are required for the following stages identification of toxic species, screening techniques for detecting toxicity, techniques for purifying toxins and provisionally identifying chemical nature, and techniques for tentatively identifying mechanisms of action. 

Fourteen formulations of chemical alternatives were submitted to EPA under confidentiality and they were assessed based on numerous human health and ecotoxicity endpoints in addition to bioaccumulation potential and environmental persistence. They were also screened for potential exposure to workers, users and the aquatic environment. Where data gaps existed, EPA experts used models and chemical analogs to estimate the hazard for a particular endpoint. The literature and test data reviews were published in the final report, Environmentally Preferable Options for Furniture Fire Safety Low Density Furniture Foam . In addition, each hazard endpoint was ranked with a concern level (High, Moderate or Low) based on the criteria used by the EPA s New Chemicals Program to rate the concern level of new chemicals submitted under the Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA). As seen in Figure 8.2, where the hazard endpoint rankings are bold, the value is based on experimental data. Where the hazard endpoints are presented in italic font, the value is estimated based on models or chemical analogs. In this way, detailed hazard information was summarized and presented in a clear and concise format. 

---