Scenario reaction

At atomistic resolution, the rates of electrocatalytic processes may differ significantly among different surface sites. In an extreme scenario, reactions could proceed exclusively at a certain fraction of surface sites, the so-called active sites, while all other sites are electrocatalytically inactive. This effect is most obvious for alloyed catalyst when a second catalyst material is added to act as active sites through the bifunctional mechanism [40]. As we shall see, it could become important for pure metals as well. 

In this process, schematically described in Figure 9, the leaching of sphalerite and the regeneration of the ferric ion occur in the same vessel within the pulp containing the leach solution and the sphalerite. In this scenario, reactions (2) and (4) occur simultaneously to produce the overall reaction 5. 

In dealing with future uncertainties. Royal Dutch/SheU pioneered Scenario planning (54,55). Alternative assumptions for future developments can be combined under this approach in various ways to give a number of consistent possible outcomes (56) and provide a basis for both actions and reactions. The approach has rewarded Shell handsomely. 

Unwanted reaction Clean and inspect equipment after each use Design with compatible materials contaminants. Maintain integrity of the system Design emergency relief system (ERS) for runaway scenario CCPS G-13 CCPS G-22 CCPS G-23 CCPS G-29... 

After the incident, an investigation team determined that the first operator had not added the initiator when required earlier in the process. When the relief operator added the initiator, the entire monomer mass was in the reactor and the reaction was too energetic for the cooling system to handle. Errors by both operators contributed to the runaway. Both operators were performing many tasks. The initiator should have been added much earlier in the process when much smaller quantities of monomer were present. There was also no procedure to require supervision review if residual monomers were detected. The lesson learned was that operators need thorough training and need to be made aware of significant hazardous scenarios that could develop. 

The American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AICliE) wishes to thank the Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS) and those involved in its operation, including its many sponsors whose funding and technical support made this project possible. Particular thanks are due to the members of the Batch Reaction Subcommittee for their enthusiasm, tireless effort and technical contributions. Members of the subcommittee played a major role in the writing of this book by suggesting examples, by offering failure scenarios for the major equipment covered in the book and by suggesting possible solutions to the various Con-cerns/Issues mentioned in the tables. 

Consequence Phase 3 Develop Detailed Quantitative Estimate of the impacts of the Accident Scenarios. Sometimes an accident scenario is not understood enough to make risk-based decisions without having a more quantitative estimation of the effects. Quantitative consequence analysis will vary according to the hazards of interest (e.g., toxic, flammable, or reactive materials), specific accident scenarios (e.g., releases, runaway reactions, fires, or explosions), and consequence type of interest (e.g., onsite impacts, offsite impacts, environmental releases). The general technique is to model release rates/quantities, dispersion of released materials, fires, and explosions, and then estimate the effects of these events on employees, the public, the facility, neighboring facilities, and the environment. 

To conclude, although the models used in lattice simulations are very simplified, the results provide general information on possible protein folding scenarios, albeit not on the detailed behavior of specific proteins, which would require more complex models and more accurate potentials. The contribution made by these simulations is that they enable an analysis of the structures, energetics, and dynamics of folding reactions at a level of detail not accessible to experiment. 

Figure 12-7. Simplified scenario of a thermal runaway. (Source T. Hoppe and B. Grob, Heat flow calorimetry as a testing method for preventing runaway reactions," Int. Symp. on Runaway Reactions, OCRS, AlChE, March 7-9, 1989.)...

This volume does not address subjects such as toxic effects, explosions in buildings and vessels, runaway reactions, condensed-phase explosions, pool fires, jet flames, or structural responses of buildings. Furthermore, no attempt is made to cover the frequency or likelihood that a related accident scenario will occur. References to other works are provided for readers interested in these phenomena. 

Stress reaction—fail to activate due to high stress experienced in scenario. 

The reaction processes shown in Scheme 8 not only accomplish the construction of an oxepane system but also furnish a valuable keto function. The realization that this function could, in an appropriate setting, be used to achieve the annulation of the second oxepane ring led to the development of a new strategy for the synthesis of cyclic ethers the reductive cyclization of hydroxy ketones (see Schemes 9 and 10).23 The development of this strategy was inspired by the elegant work of Olah 24 the scenario depicted in Scheme 9 captures its key features. It was anticipated that activation of the Lewis-basic keto function in 43 with a Lewis acid, perhaps trimethylsilyl triflate, would induce nucleophilic attack by the proximal hydroxyl group to give an intermediate of the type 44. 

The first and rate-determining step involves carbon monoxide dissociation from the initial pentacarbonyl carbene complex A to yield the coordinatively unsaturated tetracarbonyl carbene complex B (Scheme 3). The decarbonyla-tion and consequently the benzannulation reaction may be induced thermally, photochemically [2], sonochemically [3], or even under microwave-assisted conditions [4]. A detailed kinetic study by Dotz et al. proved that the initial reaction step proceeds via a reversible dissociative mechanism [5]. More recently, density functional studies on the preactivation scenario by Sola et al. tried to propose alkyne addition as the first step [6],but it was shown that this... 

The application of techniques of pulse radiolysis offers the potential to determine rates of primary radiolysis induced reaction processes. This knowledge can be of great value in the determination of redox processes of Pu ions occurring in a wide variety of aqueous solutions. As a matter of fact, such information is essential to a prediction of the Pu oxidation states to be expected in breached repository scenarios. For an... 

The rest of this chapter is a series of examples and problems built around semirealistic scenarios of reaction characteristics, reactor costs, and recovery costs. The object is not to reach general conclusions, but to demonstrate a method of approaching such problems and to provide an introduction to optimization techniques. 

The question arises as to how V, Vg, Vi, and Aj might vary during the course of the reaction. The problem statement does not give the necessary information to determine this. The reader is encouraged to create and solve some plausible scenarios, one of which allows V, Vg, Vi, and Aj to remain approximately constant. 

Studies (see, e.g., (101)) indicate that photosynthesis originated after the development of respiratory electron transfer pathways (99, 143). The photosynthetic reaction center, in this scenario, would have been created in order to enhance the efficiency of the already existing electron transport chains, that is, by adding a light-driven cycle around the cytochrome be complex. The Rieske protein as the key subunit in cytochrome be complexes would in this picture have contributed the first iron-sulfur center involved in photosynthetic mechanisms (since on the basis of the present data, it seems likely to us that the first photosynthetic RC resembled RCII, i.e., was devoid of iron—sulfur clusters). 

The authors concluded that the side reactions normally observed in amine-initiated NCA polymerizations are simply a consequence of impurities. Since the main side reactions in these polymerizations do not involve reaction with adventitious impurities such as water, but instead reactions with monomer, solvent, or polymer (i.e., termination by reaction of the amine-end with an ester side chain, attack of DMF by the amine-end, or chain transfer to monomer) [11, 12], this conclusion does not seem to be well justified. It is likely that the role of impurities (e.g., water) in these polymerizations is very complex. A possible explanation for the polymerization control observed under high vacuum is that the impurities act to catalyze side reactions with monomer, polymer, or solvent. In this scenario, it is reasonable to speculate that polar species such as water can bind to monomers or the propagating chain-end and thus influence their reactivity. 

---