Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Saturation kinetics evaluation

The often fast binding step of the inhibitor I to the enzyme E, forming the enzyme inhibitor complex E-I, is followed by a rate-determining inactivation step to form a covalent bond. The evaluation of affinity labels is based on the fulfillment of the following criteria (/) irreversible, active site-directed inactivation of the enzyme upon the formation of a stable covalent linkage with the activated form of the inhibitor, (2) time- and concentration-dependent inactivation showing saturation kinetics, and (3) a binding stoichiometry of 1 1 of inhibitor to the enzyme s active site (34). [Pg.324]

Evaluation of the polymer s catalytic activity involved monitoring hydrolysis reactions using 50-fold molar excess of 23 with respect to the theoretical amount of functional groups present in each polymer. Figure 4 shows a plot of percent hydrolysis vs. time. Curves a, b, and c correspond to polymers P-12, P-13, and P-11, respectively. It is clear that curves a and b do not display a typical pseudo first-order kinetics. Only curve c displays Michaelis-Menton kinetics, indicating P-11 contains an active site that may bear some features of saturation kinetics (Table 5) wherein cooperative effects from juxtaposed ligands help to enhance the nucleophilicity of the serine-hydroxyl group (Scheme 12). [Pg.140]

A true second-order rate is observed, indicating a 1 1 stoichiometry. Because of solubility problems, no saturation kinetics are measured, only the second-order rate constants are evaluated but not /Cgat i r the binding constants. A productive binding representation of a tetrahedral intermediate formed indicates that efficient hydrophobic binding is possible between the substrate and the steroid rings. The advantage of this system is that very little flexibility in either substrate or catalyst is allowed. [Pg.302]

Criteria for the validity of the steady state assumption can be obtained operationally by consideration of how to obtain correct values for initial rates and their use in the evaluation of the Michaelis parameters. Before going into these practical considerations some reference should be made to theoretical treatments of steady state conditions (see Segel, 1975 Wong, 1975). We use the simple form, equation (3.3.19), for saturation kinetics, differentiating to obtain a relation between the change in the steady state intermediate Ce (0 and in Cs(0 with time. [Pg.84]

Despite the obvious correspondence between scaled elasticities and saturation parameters, significant differences arise in the interpretation of these quantities. Within MCA, the elasticities are derived from specific rate functions and measure the local sensitivity with respect to substrate concentrations [96], Within the approach considered here, the saturation parameters, hence the scaled elasticities, are bona fide parameters of the system without recourse to any specific functional form of the rate equations. Likewise, SKM makes no distinction between scaled elasticities and the kinetic exponents within the power-law formalism. In fact, the power-law formalism can be regarded as the simplest possible way to specify a set of explicit nonlinear functions that is consistent with a given Jacobian. Nonetheless, SKM seeks to provide an evaluation of parametric representation directly, without going the loop way via auxiliary ad hoc functions. [Pg.195]

Evaluating the structural kinetic model, we first consider the possibility of sustained oscillations. Starting with the simplest scenario, all saturation parameters are set to unity, corresponding to bilinear mass-action kinetics and... [Pg.204]

The direction of a reaction can be assessed straightforwardly by comparing the equilibrium constant (Keq) and the ratio of the product solubility to the substrate solubility (Zsat) [39]. In the case of the zwitterionic product amoxicillin, the ratio of the equilibrium constant and the saturated mass action ratio for the formation of the antibiotic was evaluated [40]. It was found that, at every pH, Zsat (the ratio of solubilities, called Rs in that paper) was about one order of magnitude greater in value than the experimental equilibrium constant (Zsat > Keq), and hence product precipitation was not expected and also not observed experimentally in a reaction with suspended substrates. The pH profile of all the compounds involved in the reaction (the activated acyl substrate, the free acid by-product, the antibiotic nucleus, and the product) could be predicted with reasonable accuracy, based only on charge and mass balance equations in combination with enzyme kinetic parameters [40]. [Pg.296]

An ideal kinetic study would be made under conditions where the product is only graphite fluoride or polycarbon monofluoride with no byproducts formed. In terms of reaction kinetics, one method to follow the reaction is to measure the weight change as a function of the reaction time. Using this method the reaction rate of fluorine with carbon can be evaluated. Various carbon structures have been employed with sufficient fluorination contact time provided at a particular temperature for the carbon to reach fluorine saturation. The weight increase vs the temperature can be monitored at atmospheric pressure. Figure 515 shows the carbon structure and the temperature dependency of the fluorination reaction of various graphites. [Pg.213]

Herron Evaluated Chemical Kinetic Database for the Reactions of Atomic Oxygen with Saturated Organic Compounds in the Gas Phase [172]... [Pg.570]

Now that the appropriate enzyme level has been determined, the kinetic constants may be evaluated. The Ku for L-dopa can be obtained by setting up the same assay as in part B, except that the factor to vary will be the concentration of L-dopa. The concentration of L-dopa in part B was sufficient to saturate all the tyrosinase active sites, so the rate depended only on the enzyme concentration. In part C, L-dopa levels will be varied over a range that is nonsaturating. [Pg.294]


See other pages where Saturation kinetics evaluation is mentioned: [Pg.323]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.670]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.713]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.672]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.587]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.762]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.319]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.66 , Pg.67 ]




SEARCH



Kinetic evaluation

© 2024 chempedia.info