Raman spectroscopy sample

The limitations of Raman spectroscopy are its low sensitivity compared to IR absorption and fluorescence interference from impurities in the sample. Raman spectroscopy is a developing technology, and a good amount of research and planning is necessary before deciding whether or not to employ it. The cost of a Raman process analyzer exceeds that of other analyzers. To reduce cost, Raman analyzers often include multichannel capability. Up to four process streams can be analyzed with a single CCD camera by splitting the lasers. 

In the case of pharmaceutical samples, Raman spectroscopy is sensitive to crystallinity and polymorphism, both of which are important with regards to the bioavailability (and protection of the intellectual property) of active ingredients. 

Abstract. Recent years have seen a growing interest in the use of Raman-based spectroscopy as an analytical tool for the chemical analysis of biological samples. Raman spectroscopy has found many applications in cellular and structural biology, biomedicine, and biodetection. Its attractiveness for live biological studies lies mainly in its hi sensitivity to molecular interactions and small molecular scale conformational changes. In addition, the noninvasiveness of this s roach permits both in-vitro and in-vivo studies. This increased interest has been a result of advances in both instrumentation and techniques that have enabled improved data acquisition and data interpretation. This chapter addresses recent advances in Raman-based techniques and highlights their uses in specific biological studies. 

One of the well known advantages of resonance Raman spectroscopy is that samples dissolved in water can be studied since water is transparent in the visible region. Furthennore, many molecules of biophysical interest assume their native state in water. For this reason, resonance Raman spectroscopy has been particularly strongly embraced in the biophysical connnunity. 

The incident radiation should be highly monochromatic for the Raman effect to be observed clearly and, because Raman scattering is so weak, it should be very intense. This is particularly important when, as in rotational Raman spectroscopy, the sample is in the gas phase. 

In FT-Raman spectroscopy the radiation emerging from the sample contains not only the Raman scattering but also the extremely intense laser radiation used to produce it. If this were allowed to contribute to the interferogram, before Fourier transformation, the corresponding cosine wave would overwhelm those due to the Raman scattering. To avoid this, a sharp cut-off (interference) filter is inserted after the sample cell to remove 1064 nm (and lower wavelength) radiation. 

Stimulated Raman spectroscopy is experimentally different from normal Raman spectroscopy in that the scattering is observed in the forward direction, emerging from the sample in the same direction as that of the emerging exciting radiation, or at a very small angle to it. 

Fluorescence Interference. The historical drawback to widespread use of Raman spectroscopy has been the strong fluorescence background exhibited by many materials, even those which are nominally nonfluorescent. This fluorescence often arises from an impurity in the sample, but may be intrinsic to the material being studied. Several methods have proved useflil in reducing this background. One of the simplest is sample purification. 

The ease of sample handling makes Raman spectroscopy increasingly preferred. Like infrared spectroscopy, Raman scattering can be used to identify functional groups commonly found in polymers, including aromaticity, double bonds, and C bond H stretches. More commonly, the Raman spectmm is used to characterize the degree of crystallinity or the orientation of the polymer chains in such stmctures as tubes, fibers (qv), sheets, powders, and films... 

Ideally, a mass spectmm contains a molecular ion, corresponding to the molecular mass of the analyte, as well as stmcturaHy significant fragment ions which allow either the direct deterrnination of stmcture or a comparison to Hbraries of spectra of known compounds. Mass spectrometry (ms) is unique in its abiUty to determine direcdy the molecular mass of a sample. Other techniques such as nuclear magnetic resonance (nmr) and infrared spectroscopy give stmctural information from which the molecular mass may be inferred (see Infrared technology and raman spectroscopy Magnetic spin resonance). 

MOLE, however, is more sensitive than ETIR (<1 samples compared to about 100 p.m ). With surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy the Raman signal is enhanced by several orders of magnitude. This requires that the sample be absorbed on a metal surface (eg, Ag, Cu, or Au). It also yields sophisticated characterization data for the polytypes of siUcon carbide, graphite, etc. 

Instrumental Interface. Gc/fdr instmmentation has developed around two different types of interfacing. The most common is the on-the-fly or flow cell interface in which gc effluent is dkected into a gold-coated cell or light pipe where the sample is subjected to infrared radiation (see Infrared and raman spectroscopy). Infrared transparent windows, usually made of potassium bromide, are fastened to the ends of the flow cell and the radiation is then dkected to a detector having a very fast response-time. In this light pipe type of interface, infrared spectra are generated by ratioing reference scans obtained when only carrier gas is in the cell to sample scans when a gc peak appears. 

Sample preparation is straightforward for a scattering process such as Raman spectroscopy. Sample containers can be of glass or quartz, which are weak Raman scatterers, and aqueous solutions pose no problems. Raman microprobes have a spatial resolution of - 1 //m, much better than the diffraction limit imposed on ir microscopes (213). Eiber-optic probes can be used in process monitoring (214). 

---