Safe sediment

The 5,330 hectare (13,170 acre) Savanna Army Depot Activity, north of Savanna, IL, consists of high ground and Mississippi River flood plain. In the flood plain are 223 hectares of waterways connected to the river about 10 hectares of sediment plain in these waterways are considered potentially contaminated by munitions-related compounds (see Table I). Of these compounds, only TNT has been isolated (0.3 rag/kg in one sediment sample) DNT, TNB, and RDX are associated with TNT in other munitions contexts, hence they were also included. The waterways are fished by a number of activity personnel and retirees. These persons and their families may eat some of their catch, and thereby ingest those compounds that might be present in the fish (predominantly carp and catfish, both bottom-feeders). Acceptable safe sediment level guidance for these compounds was therefore desired. 

Although still in the research phase, there is some international interest in using the contaminant body burdens of sediment dwellers to help derive sediment EQS values, that is, to define a safe sediment in terms of bioaccumulated body burdens (lethal internal exposure concentrations) instead of, or in addition to, deriving a safe concentration for the sediment itself. 

A number of studies have reported PCDD and PCDF levels from sediments in North America, Europe and Asia (Table 2). Generally, the PCDD and PCDF levels in background areas ranged between <0.1 and the safe sediment value estabhshed at 20 pg TEQ/g dw, whereas levels found in polluted areas (i.e., harbours), clearly exceeded the safe value. 

The question of acceptable soil levels in waterway sediments was resolved by linking such levels to the human exposure route of fish ingestion. The fishermen involved do not require the fish they catch to provide a major portion of their diet. Thus, a safe-sided estimate of their fish dietary intake was set... 

Pavlou, S.P (1987) The use of equilibrium partition approach in determining safe levels of contaminants in marine sediments, p. 388 -12. In Fate and Effects of Sediments-Bound Chemicals in Aquatic Systems. Dickson, K.L., Maki, A.W., Brungs, W.A., Editors. Proceedings of the Sixth Pellston Workshop, Florissant, Colorado, August 12-17,1984. SETAC Special Publ. Series, Ward, C.H., Walton, B.T., Eds., Pergamon Press, N.Y. 

Implementation Samples of the river water, sediments, and even some of the dead fish are taken to the contract lab where their chemists use GC-MS, after appropriate sample preparation, to determine that there are no toxic compounds at significant levels i.e., high enough to harm the fish. Your own results for heavy metals are also negative—nothing above safe limits was detected. 

The above-cited studies demonstrate the performance of a particular unit system for the treatment of specific type of waste stream. A particular unit system alone may not be able to treat the wastewater to a level of effluent standard prescribed for its safe disposal. Hence a number of pretreatments, such as screening, sedimentation, equalization, and neutralization, and post-treatment units such as secondary sedimentation, sludge thickening, digestion and disposal, disinfection, and so on, are extremely important for complete treatment. The effluent treatment and disposal facilities adopted by various types of pharmaceutical industries are described in the following sections. 

In southeast Alaska we extensively surveyed the Icy Straits cross sound areas and - to a lesser extent - the Ketchikan area. Basically we found toxic dinoflagellates everywhere we looked. Although quantitative results were not as clear cut as we may have hoped, it appears that toxic dinoflagellate cysts are widespread and tend to concentrate in the fine sediment found in "holes" or "pockets" in the ocean bottom. Unfortunately, this appears to be the case even in the vicinity of supposedly "safe" beaches where shellfish seem to be protected only by serendipitous hydrology and/or environmental conditions. Thus the... 

Strongly radioactive waste fluids are stored in safe-tanks which are simply long, small-diameter (e.g., 20 m by 10 cm) slightly sloping pipes. To avoid sedimentation and development of hot spots, and also to insure uniformity before sampling the contents, fluid is recirculated in these pipes. 

Given the eomplexity of eontaminated sediments, rationally ehosen and applied bioassays and bioindieators for hazard, risk and impaet assessment are needed that ean prediet and deteet the biologieal effeets of eontaminants in eombination with ehemieal analyses (Chapman and Mann, 1999). This thesis foeuses on the applieability of in vitro and and in vivo bioassays and bioindieators as tools for evaluating the effeets of eomplex ehemieal mixtures in the proeess of deeiding whether dredged harbour sediments ean be safely disposed of at sea. To this end three objeetives have been defined ... 

Local sediment impact assessment can direct the fine-tuning of the selection of chemical and bioassay analyses and the setting of safe levels in the licensing system. This could eventually lead to the decision to include some additional chemical analysis or bioassay in the routine screening. 

Ontario, Canada from sediment disposal in water final water concentration The Netherlands safe level United States water hardness of 50 mg CaCOj/L... 

Water goes through the processes of sedimentation, filtration, aeration, lime-soda treatment and chlorination to make it safe for drinking. 

Equilibrium partitioning for calculating the pore water concentration of hydrophobic organic substances in sediments for comparison with the safe value in water (Di Toro et al. 1991). 

Reliable long-term mothballing of damaged NS in nuclear, radiation and environmentally safe conditions using magnesia-mineral-salt compound followed by NS deepening into sea bottom sediments could be realized in the shortest possible time. The legal aspects of such disposal should be worked over at the international level. 

---