Rubber blends filler-polymer interaction

The higher amounts of bound rubber for all samples filled with plasma-treated silica demonstrate an improved filler-polymer interaction between the plasma-treated silica and the polymers in the blend compared to untreated and silane-treated silica. The highest filler-polymer interaction for the PPy-silica can be due to the best compatibilization effect of PPy-silica with both polymers in the blend, as... 

For silica in SBR, a polyacetylene coating gives the lowest filler-filler interaction, a good filler-polymer interaction, and the best dispersion compared to untreated and the other plasma-treated samples. However, for the stress-strain properties, the polythiophene-treated sample gives the best results. This shows the importance of sulfur moieties on the surface of the filler, which form a secondary network in the cured materials. In the blend of S-SBR and EPDM rubbers, the situation is less conclusive. The Payne effect, the bound rubber, and... 

It is concluded that IR spectroscopy provides information on qualitative as well quantitative analyses of rubbery materials, apart from their microstructures (that is, whether cis or trans, syndiotactic, atactic or isotactic). Different types of rubber blends (compatibilised or self-crosslinked) can be identified by the infrared spectroscopy. Synthesis, and degradation of polymers can also be followed by IR spectra. Mechanism of interaction between rubbers and fillers, can also be studied by IR-spectra. Different types of chemical reactions like the milling behaviour of rubbers, mechanism of adhesion and degradation can also be studied with the help of IR spectroscopy. The technique plays a great role in the product analysis under reverse engineering. 

In view of the long history of research efforts on filled rubbers, it is not surprising that the initial works on filled polymer blends appeared in publications authored by rubber compounders and carbon black vendors [17, 18]. For instance, Walters and Keyte [17] observed that the compound ingredients, such as CB and zinc oxide, were not homogenously dispersed in rubber blends. Hess et al. [18] also reported a series of fundamental observations. First, they observed that filler particles tend to remain in the lower viscosity phase, in the absence of significant filler-matrix interactions. However, in the presence of strong polar-polar interactions between the filler particles and one of the phases, the particles were found to be selectively dispersed in the more polar phase and the viscosity became less important. More recently. Portal et al. [19] also presented similar observations about selective localization of CB particles in the natural rubber (NR) phase in NR/ polybutadiene blends. 

The properties of rubber-rubber blend composites depend on the size and shape and concentration of nano particles and their interactions with the individual mbber matrix. The interaction between the filler and the matrix are improved by surface modification. In the mbber industry the uniform distribution of nano particles is considered to be important as it affects the mechanical properties and performance of the composite. For mbber-mbber blend composites fillers like carbon black prefer to migrate to less polar, less viscous mbber phase whereas silica and clay particles migrate to more polar mbber phase. CNTs mainly reside in the highly polar and non-polar mbbers but not in weakly polar ones. The Tg remain unaltered for a completely incompatible blend. In the case of partially compatible blends, the Tgs of the blend components are expected to shift towards each other as compared with the pure components. Shifting of Tg of polymers to lower or higher values in a blend depends on the polarity difference and the difference in the thermal expansion coefficient of the respective polymers in the blend. 

In the case of rubber blend clay composites good state of exfoliation of the clay, sufficiendy strong filler-rubber interactions as well as the compatibility between different rubber phases are playing major role. The presence of intercalated organoclays restricts the mobility of the rubber chains due to their confinement between the layers. As the concentration of nano filler increases the loss modulus increased. This can be explained in terms of the friction between the filler particles and the rubber matrix when the filler particles are uniformly dispersed in the mbber matrix. The damping values are found to decrease with the amount of filler due to the restricted mobility of the polymer chains owing to the intercalation of polymer chains into the layers of silicates. 

The important yet unexpected result is that in NR-s-SBR (solution) blends, carbon black preferably locates in the interphase, especially when the rubber-filler interaction is similar for both polymers. In this case, the carbon black volume fraction is 0.6 for the interphase, 0.24 for s-SBR phase, and only 0.09 in the NR phase. The higher amount in SBR phase could be due to the presence of aromatic structure both in the black and the rubber. Further, carbon black is less compatible with NR-cE-1,4 BR blend than NR-s-SBR blend because of the crystallization tendency of the former blend. There is a preferential partition of carbon black in favor of cis-1,4 BR, a significant lower partition coefficient compared to NR-s-SBR. Further, it was observed that the partition coefficient decreases with increased filler loading. In the EPDM-BR blend, the partition coefficient is as large as 3 in favor of BR. 

Investigations of polymer blends has developed an increased understanding of interphase organization. In blends two interfaces exists the interface between two matrix types and distribution of filler and its interfaces with this matrices. The interphase of carbon black in blends of natural rubber and EPDM depends on the character of carbon black (surface groups available for interaction), the viscosity,... 

Engelmann s principal findings are presented in Figs 10 and 11. With test methods which respond to the material s entropy elasticity, the acrylonitrile content of the NBR and the type and amount of plasticiser exert a decisive influence. With test methods which determine toughness and brittleness characteristics at low temperatures, the rubber-filler interactions are important where polymer blends (e.g. NBR/BR) are concerned, the morphology, too, plays a decisive part ... 

---