Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Reverse osmosis Pretreatment

In temperate climate zones it may be more appropriate to install a nanofiltration process rather than reverse osmosis. Nanofiltration allows the production of drinking water from polluted rivers. As for reverse osmosis, pretreatment is important to control fouling of the membranes. One of the largest such plants produces 140,000 m3/day of water for the North Paris region(26). [Pg.469]

Ultrafiltration membranes are suitable for the treatment of radioactive liquid wastes, especially as reverse osmosis pretreatment [6]. Therefore, ultrafiltration is used for the removal of the radioactivity associated with the proteins and high-molecular-weight organic compounds, as these species can reduce reverse osmosis performance. [Pg.924]

Chlorine has been added to the feedwater upstream of reverse osmosis pretreatment. However, since chlorine will depolymerize the polyurea membrane barrier layer in the spiral wound element, with subsequent loss of desalination properties, the chlorine is removed in the pretreatment system dechlorination basin. This removal is chemically accomplished by the addition of sodium bisulfite. The chlorine level in the influent and effluent to the dechlorination basin is continuously monitored. The feedwater is then transferred from the dechlorination basin to the cartridge filter feed pumping station by gravity flow and it is then pumped to the cartridge filters. [Pg.294]

Fig. 23. Two types of hollow-fiber modules used for gas separation, reverse osmosis, and ultrafiltration applications, (a) Shell-side feed modules are generally used for high pressure appHcations up to - 7 MPa (1000 psig). Fouling on the feed side of the membrane can be a problem with this design, and pretreatment of the feed stream to remove particulates is required, (b) Bore-side feed modules are generally used for medium pressure feed streams up to - 1 MPa (150 psig), where good flow control to minimise fouling and concentration polarization on the feed side of the membrane is desired. Fig. 23. Two types of hollow-fiber modules used for gas separation, reverse osmosis, and ultrafiltration applications, (a) Shell-side feed modules are generally used for high pressure appHcations up to - 7 MPa (1000 psig). Fouling on the feed side of the membrane can be a problem with this design, and pretreatment of the feed stream to remove particulates is required, (b) Bore-side feed modules are generally used for medium pressure feed streams up to - 1 MPa (150 psig), where good flow control to minimise fouling and concentration polarization on the feed side of the membrane is desired.
A second factor determining module selection is resistance to fouling. Membrane fouling is a particularly important problem in Hquid separations such as reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration. In gas separation appHcations, fouling is more easily controlled. Hollow-fine fibers are notoriously prone to fouling and can only be used in reverse osmosis appHcations if extensive, costiy feed-solution pretreatment is used to remove ah. particulates. These fibers caimot be used in ultrafiltration appHcations at ah. [Pg.74]

Hollow-fiber designs are being displaced by spiral-wound modules, which are inherently more fouling resistant, and require less feed pretreatment. Also, thin-film interfacial composite membranes, the best reverse osmosis membranes available, have not been fabricated in the form of hoUow-fine fibers. [Pg.75]

The success of a reverse osmosis process hinges direcdy on the pretreatment of the feed stream. If typical process streams, without pretreatment to remove partially some of the constituents Hsted, were contacted with membranes, membrane life and performance would be unacceptable. There is no single pretreatment for all types of foulants. Pretreatment methods range from pH control, adsorption (qv), to filtration (qv), depending on the chemistry of the particular foulant. Some of the pretreatment methods for each type of foulant are as foUow (43—45) ... [Pg.150]

Feed characteri2ation, particularly for nondesalination appHcatioas, should be the first and foremost objective in the design of a reverse osmosis plant. This involves the determination of the type and concentration of the main solutes and foulants in the stream, temperature, pH, osmotic pressure, etc. Once the feed has been characteri2ed, a reaHstic process objective can be defined. In most cases, some level of pretreatment is needed to reduce the number and concentration of foulants present in the feed stream. Pretreatment necessitates the design of processes other than the RO module, thus the overaH process design should use the minimum pretreatment necessary to meet the process objective. Once the pretreatment steps have been determined and the final feed stream defined, the RO module can be selected. [Pg.155]

Reverse Osmosis. In reverse osmosis (qv), a solution or suspension flows under pressure through a membrane the product is withdrawn on the other side. This process can treat dissolved soHds concentrations ranging from 1 mg/L to 35 g/L (14). The principal constraint is the requirement that the waste material be relatively nonfouling. Recent advances have been mosdy in membrane development, and pilot studies are required (15). Energy costs can be significant, and it is frequently necessary to pretreat influent in order to minimize fouhng. Reverse osmosis can deal with particles < 1 to 600 nm in size. [Pg.294]

Two other major factors determining module selection are concentration polarisation control and resistance to fouling. Concentration polarisation control is a particularly important issue in liquid separations such as reverse osmosis and ultrafiltration. Hollow-fine-fibre modules are notoriously prone to fouling and concentration polarisation and can be used in reverse osmosis applications only when extensive, costly feed solution pretreatment removes all particulates. These fibres cannot be used in ultrafiltration applications at all. [Pg.374]

Provision of pretreatment The initial fill volume and MU supply is almost always pretreated in some manner. Because of the large volume of water in these systems, even low-hardness waters can produce sufficient quantities of calcium carbonate scale to severely impede heat transfer thus, for MTHW pretreatment, the use of ion-exchange softeners is the norm. For HTHW, some form of demineralization such as reverse osmosis (RO) or deionization by cation-anion exchange is typically preferred. [Pg.186]

Reverse osmosis plants also are not immune from silica fouling, and where the raw water source naturally contains relatively high levels of silica, good pretreatment of the RO FW is a prerequisite. To reduce fouling of RO membranes by silica, pretreatment by acid adjustment, alum coagulation, and filtration usually is provided. [Pg.199]

Reverse osmosis requires good pretreatment to prevent membrane fouling and loss of performance. Because it is seldom better than 60 to 70% efficient, there is a relatively high cost for pumping and discharging the additional supply water consumed. Nevertheless, it is good as a bulk water roughing process for purification. [Pg.344]

Hyperfiltration (Reverse Osmosis) is a form of membrane distillation or desalination (desalting) operating with membrane pore sizes of perhaps 1 to 10 Angstrom units. The various individual RO component technologies have improved tremendously over the last 20 to 25 years, and resistance to fouling and permeate output rates have benefited. Nevertheless, all RO plants remain susceptible to the risk of fouling, and adequate pretreatment and operation is essential to minimize this problem. [Pg.360]

As with reverse osmosis, feed pretreatment can be used to minimize membrane fouling and degradation, and regular cleaning is necessary. [Pg.198]

Seawater pretreatment, 16 25 Seawater reverse osmosis systems,... [Pg.825]

The thermodynamic approach does not make explicit the effects of concentration at the membrane. A good deal of the analysis of concentration polarisation given for ultrafiltration also applies to reverse osmosis. The control of the boundary layer is just as important. The main effects of concentration polarisation in this case are, however, a reduced value of solvent permeation rate as a result of an increased osmotic pressure at the membrane surface given in equation 8.37, and a decrease in solute rejection given in equation 8.38. In many applications it is usual to pretreat feeds in order to remove colloidal material before reverse osmosis. The components which must then be retained by reverse osmosis have higher diffusion coefficients than those encountered in ultrafiltration. Hence, the polarisation modulus given in equation 8.14 is lower, and the concentration of solutes at the membrane seldom results in the formation of a gel. For the case of turbulent flow the Dittus-Boelter correlation may be used, as was the case for ultrafiltration giving a polarisation modulus of ... [Pg.455]

Microfiltration (MF) and ultrafiltration (UF) membranes can be used as forms of pretreatment for nanofiltration (ISIF) or reverse osmosis (RO) desalination processes. Membrane pretreatment reduces the amount of chemicals that are required and hence reduces the environmental impact of the final discharge. MF membranes can be used to filter particles with diameters of 0.1-10 pmm and typically remove bacteria, viruses, precipitates, coagulates and large colloidal particles. UF can remove particles with diameters as small as 0.002 pm, and... [Pg.21]

NF has been also been studied as a potential form of pretreatment for reverse osmosis desalination processes (Hassan et al. 1998, 2000). Based on the feed water, it may be a suitable pretreatment method that allows for operation with little or even no use of antisealants. [Pg.22]

Reverse osmosis can remove dissolved metals to very low levels. It can also remove a variety of pollutants such as cyanide and residual organics from refinery wastewater. However, because it is an expensive process, it would be competitive only if removal of total dissolved solids is also required. It also requires extensive pretreatment to prevent membrane fouling and deterioration [52]. The pretreatment processes may include filtration to remove suspended solids, pH adjustment, softening, and activated carbon treatment to remove organics and chlorine. A major drawback of the RO process is the handling and disposal of the reject stream, which can amount to 20-30% of the influent flow. [Pg.297]


See other pages where Reverse osmosis Pretreatment is mentioned: [Pg.190]    [Pg.566]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.566]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.471]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.566]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.566]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.471]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.633]    [Pg.1036]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.2228]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.622]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.464]    [Pg.467]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.334]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.215 , Pg.216 , Pg.217 , Pg.218 , Pg.219 ]




SEARCH



High efficiency reverse osmosis pretreatment

Osmosis

Osmosis reversed

Reverse osmosis

Reverse osmosis pretreatment steps

© 2024 chempedia.info