Results from frontal analysis

The isotherms for the two enantiomers of phenylalanine anilide were measured at 40, 50, 60 and 70°C and the data fitted to each of the models given in equations (1), (4) and (5), using the transport model of chromatography (see Fig. 5.8) [40]. The 

CHROMATOGRAPHIC RETENTION VOLUMES OF PURINES AND PYRIMIDINES ON 9EA (PEA) AND BA (PBA) IMPRINTED MIPs 

The chromatographic investigation was performed using acetonitrile/acetic acid/water 92.5/ 5/2.5 (v/v/v) as mobile phase. 10 p of a 1.0 mM solution of each solute were injected. Guanine and guanosine were injected as 0.1 mM solutions. Data from [24] 

The fact that the isotherm data for L-PA were better fitted to the Freundlich isotherm at lower concentrations agrees with previous studies on other template systems, where the isotherm data were often best fitted to tri-Langmuir models [25]. Competitive assays using radiolabelled substrates allowed the identification of a class of sites with a very low surface coverage ca. 1 nmol/g) and high binding constants (up to 1 x 10 /M) (Table 5.3). 

---

Table 2 lists the two parameters n and Qx necessary to describe the model as determined with columns differing by the density of immobilized polyclonal antibody. As previously described, from the variation of the column capacity one can evaluate the contribution to the transport to the binding sites (I/nmt = 0.040) and calculate the effective adsorption rate constant ka. The results agree with those obtained from frontal analysis. The value of the apparent adsorption rate constant k is close to the value of Aa for experiments carried out both at high flow rates and with an immunoadsorbent column of low capacity 22). In this case, the rate-controlling step is the biospecific interaction. 

This is an oversimplified treatment of the concentration effect that can occur on a thin layer plate when using mixed solvents. Nevertheless, despite the complex nature of the surface that is considered, the treatment is sufficiently representative to disclose that a concentration effect does, indeed, take place. The concentration effect arises from the frontal analysis of the mobile phase which not only provides unique and complex modes of solute interaction and, thus, enhanced selectivity, but also causes the solutes to be concentrated as they pass along the TLC plate. This concentration process will oppose the dilution that results from band dispersion and thus, provides greater sensitivity to the spots close to the solvent front. This concealed concentration process, often not recognized, is another property of TLC development that helps make it so practical and generally useful and often provides unexpected sensitivities. 

The complex distribution system that results from the frontal analysis of a multicomponent solvent mixture on a thin layer plate makes the theoretical treatment of the TLC process exceedingly difficult. Although specific expressions for the important parameters can be obtained for a simple, particular, application, a general set of expressions that can help with all types of TLC analyses has not yet been developed. One advantage of the frontal analysis of the solvent, however, is to produce a concentration effect that improves the overall sensitivity of the technique. 

Frontal analysis is a preparative method, used primarily for the separation of one readily eluted component from the other, more tightly held components. The technique is performed by the continuous addition of a sample mixture onto the column. Initially, the component of interest, that is, the component with the least affinity for the stationary phase, will pass through the column while the other sample components are retained to various degrees by the stationary phase. As a result of the continuous sample application, the concentration of bound components steadily builds up at the head of the column. When the column capacity for any given component is exceeded, that component also passes through the column. Therefore, the first component is eluted from the column initially as a pure band and subsequently as a mixture with the next components to be eluted. 

It has to be noted that the half-height and inflection-point methods do not give reliable results if the isotherm is concave upward and ascending concentration steps are performed. The same is true for a convex upward isotherm and descending concentration steps. The reason for this is that, in these cases, a diffuse breakthrough profile is obtained and, consequently, errors are made in the accurate determination of the retention volumes when they are derived from the half-height or the inflection point. The diffuse profile can, however, be used for the determination of isotherms by the frontal analysis by characteristic points method (FACT). 

There are two possibilities for performing a frontal chromatography experiment for the purpose of the determination of equilibrium isotherms. The step-series method uses a series of steps starting from C = 0 to C +i. After each experiment, the column has to be reequilibrated and a new step injection with a different end concentration C +i can be performed. In the staircase method, a series of steps is performed in a single run with concentration steps from 0 to Q, Q to C2,.. ., C to C +i. The column does not have to be reequilibrated after each step and, therefore, the staircase method is faster than the step-series method. Both modes of frontal analysis give very accurate isotherm results. 

Figure 17 shows a section of two individual overlaid staircase chromatograms resulting from single component frontal analysis of (S) and (R)-2-phenylbutyric acid, respectively. At the first step up to 30.5 mM the enantiomers are clearly separated from each other, at the second step up to 61.0 mM they are still separated and even at the third step up, to 91.5 mM it is still a very small tendency for separation. This figure indicates that the chiral capacity is somewhat higher than 90 mM. 

Frontal analysis is straightforward when starting from an unloaded column (c1 = 0). A modification to reduce the amount of solute is the stepwise increase of the feed concentration, starting from the unloaded column. This results in successive plateaus. Desorption steps are obtained after the highest concentration plateau has passed through the column, if the concentrations are reduced inversely to the adsorption steps. To consume even less feed mixture, this procedure can be performed in closed-loop or circulation operation (Fig. 6.17). 

The same approaches that were successful in linear chromatography—the use of either one of several possible liunped kinetic models or of the general rate model — have been applied to the study of nonlinear chromatography. The basic difference results from the replacement of a linear isotherm by a nonlinear one and from the coupling this isotiienn provides between the mass balance equations of the different components of the mixture. This complicates considerably the mathematical problem. Analytical solutions are possible only in a few simple cases. These cases are limited to the band profile of a pure component in frontal analysis and elution, in the case of the reaction-kinetic model (Section 14.2), and to the frontal analysis of a pure component or a binary mixture, if one can assume constant pattern. In all other cases, the use of numerical solutions is necessary. Furthermore, in most studies found in the literature, the diffusion coefficient and the rate constant or coefficient of mass transfer are assumed to be constant and independent of the concentration. Actually, these parameters are often concentration dependent and coupled, which makes the solution of the problem as well as the discussion of experimental results still more complicated. 

This value is in agreement with the one derived from band profiles calculated with the equilibrium-dispersive model [9]. The time given by Eq. 16.20 provides useful information regarding the specifications for the experimental conditions under which staircase binary frontal analysis must be carried out to give correct results in the determination of competitive isotherms. The concentration of the intermediate plateau is needed to calculate the integral mass balances of the two components, a critical step in the application of the method (Chapter 4). This does not apply to single-pulse frontal analysis in which series of wide rectangular pulses are injected into the column which is washed of solute between successive pulses. 

The complex distribution system that results from the frontal analysis of a multicomponent solvent mixture on a thin layer plate makes the theoretical treatment of the TLC process exceedingly difficult. Although specific expressions for the important parameters can be obtained for a simple, particular, application, a general set of expressions that can help with all types of TLC analyses has not yet been developed. One advantage of the frontal analysis of the solvent, however, is to produce a concentration effect that improves the overall sensitivity of the technique. The primary parameter used in TLC is the (Rf) factor which is a simple ratio of the distance traveled by the solute to the distance traveled by the solvent front. The (Rf) factor will always be less than unity. If a standard is added to the mixture, then the ratio of the (Rf) factors of the solute to that of the standard is termed the (Rx) factor and is thermodynamically equivalent to the separation ratio (a) in GC or LC. In a similar manner, the capacity ratio (k ) of a solute can be calculated for TLC from its (Rf) factor. Resolution is measured as the distance between the centers of two spots to the mean spot width. Alternative expressions for the resolution can be given in terms of the (Rf) factor and the plate efficiency. The plate efficiency is taken (by analogy to GC and LC) as sixteen times the square of the ratio of the retention distance of the spot to the spot width, but the analogy between TLC and the techniques of GC and LC can only be used with extreme caution. The so called... 

---