Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Response detector , variation

Displacement injection is usually the preferred method because analyte ions are present in the sample zone in proportion to their concentration in the bulk sample. In addition, injection efficiency is less sensitive to variations in sample ionic strength. However, it should be noted that the presence of high salt can affect detector response and variations in the sample viscosity due to temperature, or the presence of viscosity-modifying components can affect displacement injection efficiency. [Pg.178]

Time of measurement. The time each individual measurement takes (e.g., integration of detector response or time for manual at-line grab sampling) also determines the usefulness of the response. Every variation inside the measurement cycle will be averaged, and the reconstructed signal is thus a smoothed representation. In practice, for sampling process systems, this parameter will represent a compromise between process dynamics and the measurement uncertainty. [Pg.438]

It was found that that in the case of soft beta and X-ray radiation the IPs behave as an ideal gas counter with the 100% absorption efficiency if they are exposed in the middle of exposure range ( 10 to 10 photons/ pixel area) and that the relative uncertainty in measured intensity is determined primarily by the quantum fluctuations of the incident radiation (1). The thermal neutron absorption efficiency of the present available Gd doped IP-Neutron Detectors (IP-NDs) was found to be 53% and 69%, depending on the thicknes of the doped phosphor layer ( 85pm and 135 pm respectively). No substantial deviation in the IP response with the spatial variation over the surface of the IP was found, when irradiated by the homogeneous field of X-rays or neutrons and deviations were dominated by the incident radiation statistics (1). [Pg.507]

Century organic vapour analysers are factory calibrated to measure total organic vapours according to a standard (methane). Since different organic vapours interact with the flame ionization detector (FID) to varying extents, it is vital that the instrument user be aware of the magnitude of the variation in order to obtain the most accurate data. Each user must determine relative responses for the individual instrument. [Pg.333]

Quantitative analysis using the internal standard method. The height and area of chromatographic peaks are affected not only by the amount of sample but also by fluctuations of the carrier gas flow rate, the column and detector temperatures, etc., i.e. by variations of those factors which influence the sensitivity and response of the detector. The effect of such variations can be eliminated by use of the internal standard method in which a known amount of a reference substance is added to the sample to be analysed before injection into the column. The requirements for an effective internal standard (Section 4.5) may be summarised as follows ... [Pg.247]

When there is a possibility of significant variation in detector response t constant beam intensity, it is often better to carry out comparative absorptiometry with a single detector. In a slow and cumbersome way, this was done by using the stand (Figure 3-7) in conjunction with the laboratory photometer. [Pg.91]

The detector was calibrated by pxm ing solutions of sodium dichromate of known absorbance through the sample port of the detector. The solutions were prepared in the carrier fluid which served as reference. The recorder response was measured as the ultimate height reached on the chart paper above the baseline when the sample fluid was switched to a sodiiam dichromate solution of known absorbance. The calibration was insensitive to flow-rate variations. [Pg.52]

It is being recognized increasingly that regulation can have a positive impact on laboratory productivity.36 System suitability testing has been proposed as superior to and supplemental to calibration in the UV-VIS detector.37 Large variations in both response factor and in relative response factors were observed on different instruments. Even on the same instrument, UV-VIS spectra can be extremely dependent on solution conditions, as was observed in a separation of hypericin, the antidepressant extract of St. John s wort.38... [Pg.62]

The modem HPLC system is a very powerful analytical tool that can provide very accurate and precise analytical results. The sample injection volume tends to be a minor source of variation, although fixed-loop detectors must be flushed with many times their volume in sample to attain high precision. Assuming adequate peak resolution, fluorimetric, electrochemical, and UV detectors make it possible to detect impurities to parts per billion and to quantitate impurities to parts per thousand or, in favorable cases, to parts per million. The major sources of error in quantitation are sample collection and preparation. Detector response and details of the choice of chromatographic method may also be sources of error. [Pg.155]


See other pages where Response detector , variation is mentioned: [Pg.86]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.440]    [Pg.807]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.932]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.427]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.420]    [Pg.421]    [Pg.432]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.382]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.567]    [Pg.570]    [Pg.638]    [Pg.658]    [Pg.663]    [Pg.667]    [Pg.805]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.211]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.300 , Pg.301 ]




SEARCH



Detector Responsivity

Response variation

© 2024 chempedia.info