Reactive collision Relaxation

It is also expected that reactive collisions may diminish the effects of collisional damping of the z-oscillation. An unreactive collision removes energy from the z-mode oscillation so that the ion contributes more signal current at its original cyclotron frequency whereas a reactive collision removes an ion from a reactant population giving a true indication of the loss from the original population. The loss rate from the reactant population for ions of z-oscillation, Az, is proportional to the density of reactant ions of amplitude Az. Thus, for very reactive ions, no change in sensitivity due to collisional relaxation is expected. 

Vibrational relaxation (VR) of diatomic molecules in collisions with atoms (the loss of the vibrational energy of a diatom released as the relative translational energy of the partners and the rotational energy of a molecule) represents a simplest example of non-reactive collisions between molecular species (see, e.g. [1,2]). The VR event in a collision... 

First, there are terms of the form <5S(12)[z —0L (12 z)] 5S(12)>o. From its definition in (9.12), we see that 55(12) is the deviation of the reactive operator from its velocity average. The correlation function above characterizes the time evolution (Laplace transformed) of these fluctuations. If the chemical reaction is slow, we expect that perturbations of the velocity distribution induced by the reaction will be small hence such contributions may be safely neglected in this limit. This argument may be made more formal using limiting procedures analogous to those described in Section V. In principle, one may also use this term to introduce a modification to in S(/- 2) due to velocity relaxation effects. This will lead to some effective reactive collision frequency in place of k p. 

At last, it must be kept in mind that the electronic colhsional relaxation represents a specific case of colhsional processes involving electronically excited species such as electronic-energy transfer and reactive collisions. 

Interpretation in the Ha and Da systems is not complicated by the possibility of an electronically non-adiabatic mechanism for the removal of the vibrationally excited molecules. Heidner and Kasper suggested that it was likely that relaxation occurs predominantly in reactive collisions, i.e. by... 

Microscopic kinetic equations for non-equilibrium reactions are derived in the same way as are the relaxation equations, i.e. in terms of fluxes incoming to and outgoing from a particular quantum state. Transitions in reactive collisions have to be added to those in unreactive collisions. This yields a system of equations describing both the approach to chemical equilibrium and the relaxation over energy states of molecules. For simplification, consider the initial reaction stages neglecting reverse reactions. 

When a reaction is studied in the bulk gas phase, the nascent products soon collide with other molecules, energy is transferred upon collision (thus becoming effectively partitioned among all molecules), and the overall reaction exoergicity is finally liberated in its most degraded form, i.e., heat. In macroscopic terms, the reaction is exothermic, i.e., A/f < 0. The microscopic approach of molecular dynamics, however, is concerned with the outcome of the individual reactive collisions. The experimental challenge, as discussed in Section 1.2.5, is to arrest the collisional relaxation of the nascent reaction products and to probe them as they exit from the reactive collision. In this sense, it is customary to speak about the nascent or newborn reaction products. 

Molecular dynamics in its purist approach tries to seek out (and understand) the truly elementary events. Thus it is more interested in the left than in the right panels of Figure 1.2. It is, however, concerned not only with the primary reactive collision process but also with the subsequent non-reactive, inelastic energy-transfer steps that take the system from the nascent distribution of products to the fully relaxed one. The Cl + HI system is not exceptional. Many exoergic reactions release a substantial part of their energy into internal modes of product excitation." A key problem facing us is to understand this observation in terms of the forces that act during the collision. In this introductory case study we use a model. 

The fimdamental kinetic master equations for collisional energy redistribution follow the rules of the kinetic equations for all elementary reactions. Indeed an energy transfer process by inelastic collision, equation (A3.13.5). can be considered as a somewhat special reaction . The kinetic differential equations for these processes have been discussed in the general context of chapter A3.4 on gas kmetics. We discuss here some special aspects related to collisional energy transfer in reactive systems. The general master equation for relaxation and reaction is of the type [H, 12 and 13, 15, 25, 40, 4T ] ... 

The conformational orientation between the excited CNA and CHD should be restricted very much to produce a photocycloadduct in the collision complex indicated in the scheme 1. In the fluid solvents like hexane, the rotational relaxation times of the solute molecules are rather fast compared to the reaction rate, which increases the escape probability of the reactants from the solvent cavity due to the large value of ko. On the other hand, the transit time in the reactive conformation, probably symmetrical face to face, may be longer in the liquid paraffin. This means that the observed kR may be expressed as a function of the mutual rotational relaxation time of reactants and the real reaction rate in the face-to-face conformation. In this sense, it is very important to make precise time-dependent measurements in the course of geminate recombination reaction indicated in Scheme 2, because the initial conformation after photodecomposition of cycloadduct is considered to be close to the face-to-face conformation. The studies on the geminate processes of the system in solution by the time resolved spectroscopy are now progress in our laboratory. 

Paulsen et al. (1972) developed an optical model for vibrational relaxation in reactive systems. Only collinear atom-diatom collisions were considered, i.e. impact parameter dependencies were omitted. The model was applied to vibrational relaxation of electronically excited I2 in inert gases, in which case dissociation of I2 is responsible for flux loss. Olson (1972) used an absorbing-sphere model for calculating integral cross sections of ion-ion recombination processes A++B ->A + B + AE, with A or B atoms or molecules. He employed the Landau-Zener formula to obtain a critical crossing distance Rc, and assumed the opacity to be unity for distances... 

---