Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Reaction networks bimolecular reactions

King [124] modelled a recycling chemical network (i.e., where every molecule type is produced in at least one reaction, and consumed in at least one reaction) of bimolecular reactions (i.e., where two reagent molecules react to produce two product molecules) and showed that the number of pla-... [Pg.196]

The first step is a bimolecular reaction leading to the formation of a hydrogen bond the second step is the breaking of the hydrogen bond such that the protonated species H B+ is formed the third step is the dissociation reaction to form the products. In aqueous solutions, the bimolecular reaction proceeds much faster than would be predicted from gas phase kinetic studies, and this underscores the complexity of proton transfer in solvents with extensive hydrogen-bonding networks capable of creating parallel pathways for the first step. In their au-... [Pg.582]

Reactivity tests were carried out by directly feeding phenylbenzoate, in order to confirm the hypothesis formulated about the reaction network between phenol and benzoic acid. Surprisingly, phenylbenzoate yielded benzoylphenylbenzoate and phenol as the only primary products of reaction, indicating the exclusive presence of the intermolecular mechanism of acylation. Therefore, when a high concentration of phenylbenzoate is adsorbed on the catalyst, the bimolecular mechanism is quicker that the intramolecular one. [Pg.86]

Bimolecular Reaction Rate Constant for the End Functional Groups During Network Formation... [Pg.137]

The role of the secondary and bimolecular reactions is ambiguous. Obviously, the rate at which the network grows, depends on the number of surface chlorine groups after the trichlorosilylation. This number could be increased by minimizing the secondary species. In this point of view, secondary reactions are undesirable, since they have a restricting effect on the rate of the nitrogen increase. [Pg.469]

If a reaction has to be divided into more than one elementary reaction, it is called a reaction network. The complexity of such reaction networks can be very different, ranging from just two elementary reactions to a network consisting of parallel-, side-, subsequent-, and equilibrium reactions. Details about more complicated reactions, such as bimolecular reactions, reversible reaction steps and reactions with different kinds of adsorption (chemical, physical, dissociative, etc.), can be found in the typical literature [1-4]. [Pg.252]

Barzykin and Tachiya have also developed a kinetics modeF to predict the behavior of bimolecular reactions in interconnected pore networks (Fig. 6). This effective model medium, where diffusion between pores is modeled by a potential barrier, shows an acceleration of diffusion-limited reactions on short time scale. However, if the diffusion between pores is small, only a long time scale slowing down becomes apparent, the apparent interpore kinetics constant being strongly time dependent. [Pg.340]

The presence of neighboring acid sites, however, may be important when bimolecular reaction steps are involved in the reaction network as illustrated in the following two examples. Over a series of ZSM-5 materials Halik et al. [48] showed that the conversion of... [Pg.368]

In this paper, the cracking of n-hexane, n-dodecane and n-hexadecane on ZSM-5 zeolites at about atmosphere and temperatures of 260-400°C were studied. The results showed that both mono-molecular cracking and bimolecular reaction (disproportionation) for n-hexane cracking took place. A network for initial reactions was proposed, and the apparent kinetic parameters of the reactions were estimated. An examination for the factors affecting the product destribu-tion of n-hexadecane indicated that hydrogen transfer on the surface of HZSM-5 zeolites plays an important role in cracking reaction. [Pg.627]

Most of the theory of diffusion and chemical reaction in gas-solid catalytic systems has been developed for these simple, unimolecular and irreversible reactions (SUIR). Of course this is understandable due to the obvious simplicity associated with this simple network both conceptually and practically. However, most industrial reactions are more complex than this SUIR, and this complexity varies considerably from single irreversible but bimolecular reactions to multiple reversible multimolecular reactions. For single reactions which are bimolecular but still irreversible, one of the added complexities associated with this case is the non-monotonic kinetics which lead to bifurcation (multiplicity) behaviour even under isothermal conditions. When the diffusivities of the different components are close to each other that added complexity may be the only one. However, when the diffusiv-ities of the different components are appreciably different, then extra complexities may arise. For reversible reactions added phenomena are introduced one of them is discussed in connection with the ammonia synthesis reaction in chapter 6. [Pg.89]

The ease with which bimolecular reactions between mononuclear species were occurring in the mechanisms [M = M, m, M — M ]cber+uni leads to some concern about potential for partial product formation reversibility. Therefore, a triply labelled cyclopentane carboxaldehyde was prepared (C5H8D) CDO. This triply labelled product was then injected under hydroformylation conditions where H2 and natural abundance CO were used. There was no indication whatsoever over the circa 4 h reaction that any (CsHgDj CDO was incorporated into the mechanism [M = M, M, M — M ]cber+uni and then converted back to product either as (CsHgDj CDO or (CsHgD) CHO or (CgHgDj CHO by a partially reversible network. [Pg.223]

The conversion ranges of state I and state II depended on the structures and properties of the polymer network formed. At the beginning, the polymer radicals disappeared via bimolecular reactions according to the hjrperbolic law (equation (4.9)) and then by radical trapping according to an exponential law (equation (4.15)). The relative importance of these two processes depended mainly on radical mobilities, monomer functionality and chain transfer reaction. [Pg.143]

Inokuma Y, Kojima N, Arai T, Fujita M (2011) Bimolecular reaction via the successive introduction of two substrates into the crystals of networked molecular cages. J Am Chem Soc 133 19691-19693... [Pg.410]

Polymers can be used either to promote or to retard bimolecular reactions. Reactants that have greater affinities for the polymer than for surrounding solution can be concentrated into a polymer gel or into polymer random coils in solution. Reactants that normally diffuse freely in solution can be semi-immobilized by binding to a polymer network. [Pg.879]

According to the model, a perturbation at one site is transmitted to all the other sites, but the key point is that the propagation occurs via all the other molecules as a collective process as if all the molecules were connected by a network of springs. It can be seen that the model stresses the concept, already discussed above, that chemical processes at high pressure cannot be simply considered mono- or bimolecular processes. The response function X representing the collective excitations of molecules in the lattice may be viewed as an effective mechanical susceptibility of a reaction cavity subjected to the mechanical perturbation produced by a chemical reaction. It can be related to measurable properties such as elastic constants, phonon frequencies, and Debye-Waller factors and therefore can in principle be obtained from the knowledge of the crystal structure of the system of interest. A perturbation of chemical nature introduced at one site in the crystal (product molecules of a reactive process, ionized or excited host molecules, etc.) acts on all the surrounding molecules with a distribution of forces in the reaction cavity that can be described as a chemical pressure. [Pg.168]

The above models describe a simplified situation of stationary fixed chain ends. On the other hand, the characteristic rearrangement times of the chain carrying functional groups are smaller than the duration of the chemical reaction. Actually, in the rubbery state the network sites are characterized by a low but finite molecular mobility, i.e. R in Eq. (20) and, hence, the effective bimolecular rate constant is a function of the relaxation time of the network sites. On the other hand, the movement of the free chain end is limited and depends on the crosslinking density 82 84). An approach to the solution of this problem has been outlined elsewhere by use of computer-assisted modelling 851 Analytical estimation of the diffusion factor contribution to the reaction rate constant of the functional groups indicates that K 1/x, where t is the characteristic diffusion time of the terminal functional groups 86. ... [Pg.138]

In addition to azobenzene, coumarin-modified mesoporous networks have been used to create light-induced controlled release.63,64 The action of coumarin differs from that of azobenzene in that illumination drives a reversible bimolecular coupling reaction, creating a cyclobutane dimer that physically blocks pore egress. [Pg.540]

The above systematics of substitution reaction mechanisms are automatically deducibie from the complete chemical set of entities for any atom (constructed by us above). To demonstrate this, it is sufficient to note that the universal operator for all the ligand-electron networks described in the preceding section precisely corresponds to all the classical mechanisms for mono- and bimolecular substitution at a saturated atom. To facilitate understanding of this operator, and the canonical designations of the corresponding mechanisms, we illustrate it in Fig. 4.23 for a typical stable hydrocarbon (the methane molecule). Naturally, the conclusions arrived at can be readily extended to include any other E—X bonds and D reagents. [Pg.184]

The molecularity of a step indicates how many reactant molecules participate. For example, a step A— P is unimolecular, steps 2A— P and A + B— P are bimolecular. Trimolecular steps are rare, and quadrimolecular steps are unheard-of. Molecularities can only be stated if the pathway or network of the respective reaction is known. They refer to individual steps. For a multistep reaction as a whole, no molecularity can be defined. [Pg.12]


See other pages where Reaction networks bimolecular reactions is mentioned: [Pg.44]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.443]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.730]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.629]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.10]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.42 , Pg.43 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.42 , Pg.43 ]




SEARCH



Reaction network

© 2024 chempedia.info