Reaction coupled, thermodynamics

In the absence of chemical reactions coupled with the electron transfer steps, the injection, or removal, of a second electron into, or from, a molecule (Scheme 1.2) is usually more difficult, thermodynamically speaking, than the first (E > f°r reductions, < E° for oxidations). Equivalently, the... 

The thermodynamic feasibility of redox reactions at the semiconductor-electrolyte interface can be assessed from thermodynamic considerations. Since typical redox potentials for many redox couples encountered in electrolytes of natural or technical systems often lie between the band potentials of typical semiconductors, many electron transfer reactions are (thermodynamically) feasible (Pichat and Fox, 1988). With the right choice of semiconductor material and pH the redox potential of the cb can be varied from 0.5 to 1.5 V and that of the vb from 1 to more than 3.5 V (see Fig. 10.4). 

Equation (6) links, in a simple way, the thermodynamically important stability constants Kox and /Cred of a complex in different oxidation states with experimentally measurable redox potentials EH and EHa. Therefore it provides an easy way to obtain the ratio of KoxIKted, which is a theoretically useful parameter known as the binding enhancement factor (BEF). We propose that a better description for this ratio would be the reaction coupling efficiency (RCE) since binding by so-called molecular switches may be reduced or enhanced, depending upon the particular system involved. Equation (6) also allows the calculation of Kox if Kted is known or vice versa. 

In the last two decades, significant attention has been paid to the study of surface electrode reactions with SWV and various methodologies have been developed for thermodynamic and kinetic characterization of these reactions. In the following chapter, several types of surface electrode processes are addressed, including simple quasireversible surface electrode reaction [76-84], surface reactions involving lateral interactions between immobilized species [85], surface reactions coupled with chemical reactions [86-89], as well as two-step surface reactions [90,91]. 

Coupling of 834 with 783 gave 835, which cyclized to 836 (92MI8). However, treatment of the sodium salt of 839 with 783 afforded a mixture of two major positional isomers of nucleosides. The reaction is thermodynamically controlled. At room temperature the N-1 isomer predominates, whereas formation of the N-7 isomer increases with an increase in temperature. Debromination of the mixture gave 840 and 841, which could be separated. 

A and B in the A/AmB /B reaction couple. The (parabolic) reaction rate constant k (if local thermodynamic equilibrium prevails throughout the couple) conforms to Eqn. (6.32) if we disregard stoichiometric factors. The pertinent rate constant is then... 

All prebiotic polymerization reactions, which are dehydration reactions, are thermodynamically unfavorable. This free energy barrier can be overcome in two ways. The first is to drive the dehydration reaction by coupling it to the hydration of a high energy compound, and the second method is to remove the water by heating. In principle, visible or ultraviolet light could drive these reactions, but so far no one has demonstrated adequately such processes. 

Despite the clear importance of RA, its behavior is still not properly understood. This can be attributed to a very complex combination of process thermodynamics and kinetics, with intricate reaction schemes including ionic species, reaction rates varying over a wide range, and complex mass transfer and reaction coupling. As compared to distillation, RA is a fully rate-controlled process, and it dehnitely occurs far from the equilibrium state. Therefore, practitioners and theoreticians are highly interested in establishing a proper rate-based description of this process. 

Exact laws governing the sequence of occurrence of compound layers in a particular reaction couple have not so far been established. What is available is a few empirical rules predicting this sequence at a probability level of about 60 to 90 %. These are based either (i) on the structure of the equilibrium phase diagram of a binary system or (ii) on the thermodynamic properties of its compounds. 

The sequence of their occurrence is determined by the rates of chemical transformations at the interfaces. It cannot yet be theoretically predicted with full confidence for any particular reaction couple A-B. Having sufficient information on the equilibrium phase diagram, thermodynamics of chemical reactions, and the structure and physical-chemical properties of the compounds, it is possible to indicate those of them, which are most likely to occur and grow first at the A-B interface. 

We illustrate this phenomenon of coupling reactions for the case where we require to synthesise AC4(1). Assume that AC4(1) cannot be produced by the multiphase reaction (28.1) because AG4 > 0 and the reaction is thermodynamically unfavourable. If a second reaction, such as (28.2), is chosen, which ... 

That is, the activated low-pressure vapor deposited diamond process has been quantitatively verified as an example of thermodynamic reaction coupling, because all these data of molar Gibbs free energy changes are subordinate to criterion in modem thermodynamics for reaction coupling, i.e. [(AGOt > 0, (AG2)t p < 0 and (AG)t p<0]. 

The first order division is based on the system with or without reaction coupling, so the modern thermodynamics in a broad sense has been divided into the classical thermodynamics and the modem thermodynamics in a narrow sense. It is very clear that classical thermodynamics should only be used for simpler systems without reaction coupling, because the second law of thermodyneimics, such as dG)r,p 0, is only concerned with the whole system and not concerned with individual processes. That is a severe limitation of classical thermodynamics, because systems in modem inorganic synthesis and in life science are usually complex with multi-reaction processes including reaction coupling. 

Now definitions or frameworks of modem thermodynamics in a broad sense, of classical thermodynamics, and of modem thermodynamics in a narrow sense are very clear. Modern thermodynamics in a broad sense includes all fields of thermodynamics (both classical thermodynamics and modem thermodynamics in a narrow sense) for any macroscopic system, but modem thermodynamics in a narrow sense includes only three fields of thermodynamics, i.e., nonequilibrium nondissipative thermodynamics, linear dissipative thermodynamics and nonlinear dissipative thermodynamics. The modem thermodynamics in a narrow sense should not be called nonequilibrium thermodynamics, because the classical nonequilibrium thermodynamics is not included. Meanwhile, the classical thermodynamics should only be applied to simpler systems without reaction coupling. That is, the application of classical thermodynamics to some modem inorganic syntheses and to the life science may be not suitable. Without the self-consistent classification of modem thermodynamics it was very difficult to really accept the term of modem thermodynamics even only for teaching courses. 

---