Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Random phase approximation methods

Olvera de la Cruz and Sanchez [76] were first to report theoretical calculations concerning the phase stability of graft and miktoarm AnBn star copolymers with equal numbers of A and B branches. The static structure factor S(q) was calculated for the disordered phase (melt) by expanding the free energy, in terms of the Fourier transform of the order parameter. They applied path integral methods which are equivalent to the random phase approximation method used by Leibler. For the copolymers considered S(q) had the functional form S(q) 1 = (Q(q)/N)-2% where N is the total number of units of the copolymer chain, % the Flory interaction parameter and Q a function that depends specifically on the copolymer type. S(q) has a maximum at q which is determined by the equation dQ/dQ=0. [Pg.110]

A theoretical expression giving the scattering intensity I(q) through the full range of q can be derived by using the same random phase approximation method used for a polymer blend. Again, we can only quote the final result here, which was obtained by Leibler,9 under exactly the same assumptions as those used for the derivation of... [Pg.224]

One of the main problems with this TDHF procedure, though, is its poor convergence behavior, which becomes worse as a pole is approached. This simple approach is particularly hard to converge above the first pole, and conventional random phase approximation methods (to be discussed later) work better in this region. More work needs to be done to improve the initial guess and to develop better convergence accelerators. [Pg.261]

Although the possibility of the order-disorder transition was recognized in most of the block copolymer theories, it is Leibler who has expressedly addressed this problem. He derived the free energy of a block copolymer system in a series expanded in powers of the order parameter j denoting the deviation of the local density from the mean. The coefficients of this expansion up to the fourth ordef term were evaluated by a method which is a generalization of the random phase approximation method described above (Equation (16) was, in fact, derived as the second order term in the... [Pg.123]

A second method is to use a perturbation theory expansion. This is formulated as a sum-over-states algorithm (SOS). This can be done for correlated wave functions and has only a modest CPU time requirement. The random-phase approximation is a time-dependent extension of this method. [Pg.258]

RPA, and CPHF. Time-dependent Hartree-Fock (TDFIF) is the Flartree-Fock approximation for the time-dependent Schrodinger equation. CPFIF stands for coupled perturbed Flartree-Fock. The random-phase approximation (RPA) is also an equivalent formulation. There have also been time-dependent MCSCF formulations using the time-dependent gauge invariant approach (TDGI) that is equivalent to multiconfiguration RPA. All of the time-dependent methods go to the static calculation results in the v = 0 limit. [Pg.259]

RPA (random-phase approximation) ah initio method used for computing nonlinear optical properties... [Pg.368]

In the self-consistent field linear response method [25,46,48] also known as random phase approximation (RPA) [49] or first order polarization propagator approximation [25,46], which is equivalent to the coupled Hartree-Fock theory [50], the reference state is approximated by the Hartree-Fock self-consistent field wavefunction < scf) and the set of operators /i j consists of single excitation and de-excitation operators with respect to orbital rotation operators [51],... [Pg.474]

The vertical IPs of CO deserve special attention because carbon monoxide is a reference compound for the application of photoelectron spectroscopy (PES) to the study of adsorption of gases on metallic surfaces. Hence, the IP of free CO is well-known and has been very accurately measured [62]. A number of very efficient theoretical methods specially devoted to the calculation of ionization energies can be found in the literature. Most of these are related to the so-called random phase approximation (RPA) [63]. The most common formulations result in the equation-of-motion coupled-cluster (EOM-CC) equations [59] and the one-particle Green s function equations [64,65] or similar formalisms [65,66]. These are powerful ways of dealing with IP calculations because the ionization energies are directly obtained as roots of the equations, and the repolarization or relaxation of the MOs upon ionization is implicitly taken into account [59]. In the present work we remain close to the Cl procedures so that a separate calculation is required for each state of the cation and of the ground state of the neutral to obtain the IP values. [Pg.93]

In the 1950s, many basic nuclear properties and phenomena were qualitatively understood in terms of single-particle and/or collective degrees of freedom. A hot topic was the study of collective excitations of nuclei such as giant dipole resonance or shape vibrations, and the state-of-the-art method was the nuclear shell model plus random phase approximation (RPA). With improved experimental precision and theoretical ambitions in the 1960s, the nuclear many-body problem was born. The importance of the ground-state correlations for the transition amplitudes to excited states was recognized. [Pg.14]

We presented fully self-consistent separable random-phase-approximation (SRPA) method for description of linear dynamics of different finite Fermi-systems. The method is very general, physically transparent, convenient for the analysis and treatment of the results. SRPA drastically simplifies the calculations. It allows to get a high numerical accuracy with a minimal computational effort. The method is especially effective for systems with a number of particles 10 — 10, where quantum-shell effects in the spectra and responses are significant. In such systems, the familiar macroscopic methods are too rough while the full-scale microscopic methods are too expensive. SRPA seems to be here the best compromise between quality of the results and the computational effort. As the most involved methods, SRPA describes the Landau damping, one of the most important characteristics of the collective motion. SRPA results can be obtained in terms of both separate RPA states and the strength function (linear response to external fields). [Pg.147]

Currently the time dependent DFT methods are becoming popular among the workers in the area of molecular modelling of TMCs. A comprehensive review of this area is recently given by renown workers in this field [116]. From this review one can clearly see [117] that the equations used for the density evolution in time are formally equivalent to those known in the time dependent Hartree-Fock (TDHF) theory [118-120] or in its equivalent - the random phase approximation (RPA) both well known for more than three quarters of a century (more recent references can be found in [36,121,122]). This allows to use the analysis performed for one of these equivalent theories to understand the features of others. [Pg.473]

Many-body calculations which go beyond the Hartree-Fock model can be performed in two ways, i.e. using either a variational or a perturbational procedure. There are a number of variational methods which account for correlation effects superposition-of-configurations (or configuration interaction (Cl)), random phase approximation with exchange, method of incomplete separation of variables, multi-configuration Hartree-Fock (MCHF) approach, etc. However, to date only Cl and MCHF methods and some simple versions of perturbation theory are practically exploited for theoretical studies of many-electron atoms and ions. [Pg.16]

The basic computational method is that of coupled Hartree-Fock perturbation theory (14). At present we prefer the GIAO implementation mentioned above because of its computational efficiency and ease of use, but we have previously used a common gauge-origin method as implemented in the software SYSMO (15) as well as the random-phase approximation, localized orbital (RPA LORG) approach as implemented in the software RPAC (16). [Pg.306]

Among other methods employed to investigate positron impact excitation of helium, mention should be made of the random-phase approximation used by Ficocelli Varracchio (1990), the results of which are in best overall agreement with the data of Mori and Sueoka (1994). This approximation was also used by Ficocelli Varracchio and Parcell (1992) to determine the 31F excitation cross section, which was found to... [Pg.220]

The relativistic or non-relativistic random-phase approximation (RRPA or RPA)t is a generalized self-consistent field procedure which may be derived making the Dirac/Hartree-Fock equations time-dependent. Therefore, the approach is often called time-dependent Dirac/Hartree-Fock. The name random phase comes from the original application of this method to very large systems where it was argued that terms due to interactions between many alternative pairs of excited particles, so-called two-particle-two-hole interactions ((2p-2h) see below) tend to... [Pg.209]


See other pages where Random phase approximation methods is mentioned: [Pg.304]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.502]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.87]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.259 ]




SEARCH



Approximation methods

Method phase

Method random

Phase approximation

Random phase

© 2024 chempedia.info