Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Radionuclides modelling

In concluding our discussion of terrestrial ecosystems, it seems appropriate to quote from Reichle and Crossley (1967) on the radionuclide model for secondary production ... [Pg.195]

Eyman, L. D., J. R. Trabalka, and F. N. Case. 1976. Plutonium-237 and -246 Their production and use as gamma tracers in research on plutonium kinetics in an aquatic consumer, pp. 193-203. In Environmental Toxicity of Aquatic Radionuclides Models and Mechanisms (M. W. Miller and J. N. Stannard, eds.). Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Ann Arbor. [Pg.284]

The analysis of the consequences of nuclear accidents began with physical concepts of core melt, discussed the mathematical and code models of radionuclide release and transport within the plant to its release into the environment, models for atmospheric transport and the calculation of health effects in humans. After the probabilities and consequences of the accidents have been determined, they must be assembled and the results studied and presented to convey the meanings. [Pg.331]

Powers, D. A, et al., I985, VANESA, A Mechanistic Model of Radionuclide Release and Aerosol Generation during Core Debris Interaction with Concrete, NUREG/CR-4308. [Pg.487]

Model of Pb, Bi, and Po degassing. For a purpose of clarity, it is considered here that the degassing reservoir has reached a chemical steady-state (i.e., radionuclide activities in the degassing reservoir are constant, that is d(Ik)iydt = 0 in Eqn. 4). This assumption usually is valid for very active basaltic systems like Stromboli, where erupted products display an almost constant chemical composition as shown above, and where the degassing reservoir is quickly and continuously replenished with deep undegassed magma. [Pg.158]

Model components. Models generally consider 3 populations of radionuclides ... [Pg.321]

There are various parameters and assumptions defining radionuclide behavior that are frequently part of model descriptions that require constraints. While these must generally be determined for each particular site, laboratory experiments must also be conducted to further define the range of possibilities and the operation of particular mechanisms. These include the reversibility of adsorption, the relative rates of radionuclide leaching, the rates of irreversible incorporation of sorbed nuclides, and the rates of precipitation when concentrations are above Th or U mineral solubility limits. A key issue is whether the recoil rates of radionuclides can be clearly related to the release rates of Rn the models are most useful for providing precise values for parameters such as retardation factors, and many values rely on a reliable value for the recoil fluxes, and this is always obtained from Rn groundwater activities. These values are only as well constrained as this assumption, which therefore must be bolstered by clearer evidence. [Pg.354]

Modeling of the transport of the long-lived nuclides, especially U, require knowledge of the input at the water table as a boundary condition for aquifer profiles. There are few studies of the characteristics of radionuclides in vadose zone waters or at the water table. Significant inputs are likely to occur to the aquifer due to elevated rates of weathering in soils, and this is likely to be dependent upon climatic parameters and has varied with time. Soils may also be a source of colloids and so provide an important control on colloidal transport near recharge regions. [Pg.355]

Figure 2. Simplified box model depicting the dominant input and removal functions for a particle reactive radionuclide such as in a well-mixed estuarine system. Figure 2. Simplified box model depicting the dominant input and removal functions for a particle reactive radionuclide such as in a well-mixed estuarine system.
Santschi PH, Li YH, Adler DM, Amdurer M, Bell J, Nyffeler UP (1983) The relative mobility of natural (Th, Pb and Po) and fallout (Pu, Am, Cs) radionuclides in the coastal marine-enviromnent - results from model-ecosystems (MERL) and Narragansett Bay. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 47 201-210... [Pg.604]

The ICRP (1994b, 1995) developed a Human Respiratory Tract Model for Radiological Protection, which contains respiratory tract deposition and clearance compartmental models for inhalation exposure that may be applied to particulate aerosols of americium compounds. The ICRP (1986, 1989) has a biokinetic model for human oral exposure that applies to americium. The National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement (NCRP) has also developed a respiratory tract model for inhaled radionuclides (NCRP 1997). At this time, the NCRP recommends the use of the ICRP model for calculating exposures for radiation workers and the general public. Readers interested in this topic are referred to NCRP Report No. 125 Deposition, Retention and Dosimetry of Inhaled Radioactive Substances (NCRP 1997). In the appendix to the report, NCRP provides the animal testing clearance data and equations fitting the data that supported the development of the human mode for americium. [Pg.76]

Carroll J, Harms IH. 1999. Uncertainty analysis of partition coefficients in a radionuclide transport model. Water Res 33(11) 2617-2626. [Pg.230]

James A, Roy M. 1987. Dosimetric lung models. In Gerber G, et al., ed. Age-related factors in radionuclide metabolism and dosimetry. Boston Martinus Nijhofif Publishers, 95-108. [Pg.314]

The sources of uncertainty in NAA analysis are well understood, and can be derived in advance, modelled and assessed experimentally. There are two main kinds of interferences in the calculation of trace-element concentrations by INAA. The first one is formation of the same radionuclide from two different elements. Another kind of interference is from two radionuclides having very close y lines. Whenever interferences occur, the radionuclide of interest can be carried through a post-irradiation radiochemical separation without the danger of contamination. [Pg.664]


See other pages where Radionuclides modelling is mentioned: [Pg.345]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.483]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.424]    [Pg.425]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.319]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.331]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.344]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.485]    [Pg.567]    [Pg.616]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.307]   


SEARCH



Modeling radionuclides

Radionuclide speciation modelling

© 2024 chempedia.info