Rabbit damage

Skin and eye irritation. Rat, rabbit Damage of eye or skin after... 

ArtoJii 1993 rabbit damage by free radicals (peroxidation) HPMC > HY (for 1 10 mM) HY > HPMC (for HWmM)... 

Toxicology. The acute oral and dermal toxicity of naphthalene is low with LD q values for rats from 1780—2500 mg/kg orally (41) and greater than 2000 mg/kg dermally. The inhalation of naphthalene vapors may cause headache, nausea, confusion, and profuse perspiration, and if exposure is severe, vomiting, optic neuritis, and hematuria may occur (28). Chronic exposure studies conducted by the NTP ia mice for two years showed that naphthalene caused irritation to the nasal passages, but no other overt toxicity was noted. Rabbits that received 1—2 g/d of naphthalene either orally or hypodermically developed changes ia the lens of the eye after a few days, foUowed by definite opacity of the lens after several days (41). Rare cases of such corneal epithelium damage ia humans have been reported (28). Naphthalene can be irritating to the skin, and hypersensitivity does occur. 

A comprehensive study of the tolerance of laboratory animals to vapors of 2-nitropropane was reported in 1952 (100). In a study pubHshed in 1979, rabbits and rats survived exposure to nitromethane for six months at 750 and 100 ppm, respectively, with no unexpected findings (101). Similarly, no compound-related effects were found for rabbits exposed to 2-nitropropane at 200 ppm or for rabbits or rats exposed at 27 ppm. Liver damage was extensive in male rats exposed at 207 ppm for six months, and hepatocellular carcinomas were observed. Subsequendy, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (lARC) found that there is "sufficient evidence" to conclude that 2-nitropropane causes cancer in rats but that epidemiologic data are inadequate to reinforce the conclusion in humans (102). The National Toxicology Program also concluded that it "may reasonably be anticipated to be a carcinogen" (103). 

Bromothiophenes are toxic materials by aU routes. Inhalation toxicity of 2-bromothiophene is significant. Ecotoxicity is also noted for these materials, particularly for 2-bromo-3-methylthiophene. 2-Thiophenecarboxaldehyde and the 3-methyl derivative can cause minor irritation to the skin and eyes of rabbits. The former is a sensitizer to guinea pig skin, the latter is not. 2-Acetylthiophene is toxic in aU modes of contact. Severe exposure causes serious inflammation of the lung, damage to many organs, and depression of the central nervous system. 

Toxicity of 2-Ghloroethanol. Ethylene chlorohydrin is an irritant and is toxic to the Hver, kidneys, and central nervous system. In addition, it is rapidly absorbed through the skin (73). The vapor is not sufficiently irritating to the eyes and respiratory mucous membranes to prevent serious systemic poisoning. Contact of the Hquid in the eyes of rabbits causes moderately severe injury, but in humans corneal bums have been known to heal within 48 hours. Several human fataUties have resulted from inhalation, dermal contact, or ingestion. One fatahty was caused by exposure to an estimated 300 ppm in air for 2.25 hours. In another fatal case, autopsy revealed pulmonary edema and damage to the Hver, kidneys, and brain (73). 

Toxicity. MEDINA is apparently non-toxic to rabbit penile mucosa its cumulative effect on abraded and intact rabbit skin is slightly greater than Tetryl no damage was observed to rabbit cornea and there was no evidence of sensitization by subcutaneous injection in guinea pigs. It was concluded that its toxicity is similar to that of Tetryl (Ref 11, p 138)... 

Toxicity. Injection of aq Na perchlorate into rabbits caused no long term toxic effects. It behaved as a mild muscular poison, and large doses caused liver damage and diarrhea. Goldfish will live indefinitely in a 0.1% soln, but a 1% soln will cause asphyxia (Ref 4)... 

There have been no reports of renal toxicity associated with acute inhalation exposure to endosulfan in laboratory animals. However, acute oral and dermal exposure to endosulfan has been reported to cause damage to the kidneys of rats, rabbits, and dogs (FMC 1958, 1980a Gupta and Chandra 1975 Hoechst... 

In recent studies on perfused rats hearts (Veitch et al., 1992), it was found that differences in the sensitivity of complexes 1-lV to ischaemic damage were dependent upon the duration of ischaemia and the presence of oxygen. The demonstration that complex 1 is a major defective site dependent upon isolation of mitochondria from homogenates of the tissue by in vitro methods seemed important to us. We therefore decided to attempt to make noninvasive measurements of mitochondrial function soon after reperfusion in transplanted rabbit kidneys by surface fluorescence (for mitochondrial NADH levels) and near infra-red spectroscopy (NIRS) for the redox state of cytaas. 

CotteriU, L.A., Gower, J.D., FuUer, B.J. and Green, C.J. (1989b). Oxidative stress during hypothermic storage of rabbit kidneys possible mechanisms by which calcium mediates free radical damage. Cryolett. 10, 119-126. 

Green, C.J., Healing, G., Lunec, J., FuUer, B.J. and Simpkin, S. (1986a). Evidence of free radical-induced damage in rabbit kidneys after simple hypothermic preservation and autotransplantation. Transplantation 41, 161-165. 

There have been recent studies on the importance of NO in modulating skin blood flow in both normal animals and in inflammatory models. Khan etiU. (1993), using laser-Doppler techniques, showed that the NOS inhibitor L-NAME inhibited rabbit ear blood flow. It was possible to do this chronically for up to 2 weeks using implanted osmotic pumps. Pons et id. (1993) also used laser Doppler to show that the vasodilator eflFect of LPS in rabbit skin, which mimics the efiect of Gram-negative bacteria, was likely to involve both i-NOS and IL-1. We have already discussed the damaging eflPects of neutrophils... 

---