Quantitative risk assessment dealing with

Risk assessment can be qualitative or quantitative. We shall deal with qualitative risk assessment first. 

Altliough the technical conununity lias come a long way in understanding how to do a better job in liazard identification, dose-response assessment, and e.xposure assessment portions of risk assessment, it lias only begun to imderstand how to best cliaractcrize hcaltli risks and how to present tliese risks most appropriately to both the public and decision makers. The next tliree sections specifically address tlicse issues. Tliis section deals with qualitative risk assessment while tlie next two sections deal witli quantitative risk assessment. 

My thesis in this paper is that in order to be "good", a quantitative risk assessment must characterize and deal with the major uncertainties associated with the problem. But before I can address this issue I must first concern myself with what I mean by"good." Good against what criteria Good given what objectives ... 

There are several levels of risk analysis within most methodologies for assessing risk quantitative, semi-quantitative, and qualitative. For PSSR concerns we deal almost exclusively with qualitative assessments, that is, just a determination of high or low risk. Generally any truly quantitative risk analysis (QRA) indicated for a trigger event would be performed to enhance the process hazard analysis. The associated PSSR for such a trigger event would simply follow action item progress related to the quantitative risk assessment s action items. In this case the PSSR helps assure that any action items from a QRA are appropriately followed. 

Risk assessment in human populations is broadly defined within the vocabulary of the National Academy of Science/National Research Council (NAS/ NRC) (1983) monograph on the topic as [quantitative] characterization of the potential adverse health effects from quantified exposures of humans to environmental hazards. In keeping with the NRC report s use of the term, both qualitative and quantitative risk assessments are considered when dealing with lead contamination and adverse effects in this text, although the most useful information emerged when empirical determination or modeling estimations produced a numerical outcome. Part 4 (Chapters 20—24) of this monograph presents the topic of human health risk assessment in detail. 

A vital objective of future European chemicals policy is to avoid uncontrolled handling of hazardous substances. Assessment of each individual application on the basis of the individual substances involved (as provided for by the current regulatory system) is not an apt strategy, as the number of assessment and management cases that it produces is much too high. Quantitative risk analyses are only taken into account in the case of substances with clearly definable effect thresholds and controllable application conditions. For 90% of the market actors the particular product or application system must possess intrinsically safe properties, as most companies have neither closed systems nor the reqnired skills to deal with hazardons snbstances. 

Risk assessment iinoKes the integration of the information and analysis associated with the above four steps to provide a complete characterization of the nature and magnitude of risk and the degree of confidence associated with tliis characterization. A critical component of the assessment is a full elucidation of the uncertainties associated witli each of die major steps. Under this broad concept of risk assessment are encompassed all of the essential problems of toxicology. Risk assessment takes into account all of the available dose-response data. It should treat uncertainty not by the application of arbitrary safety factors, but by stating them in quantitatively and qualitatively explicit tenns, so tluit they tire not hidden from decision makers. Risk assessment defined in tliis broad way, forces an assessor to confront all the scientific uncertainties and to set fortli in e.xplicit terms tlie means used in specific cases to deal with these uncertainties. An e. panded presentation on each of the four hcaltli risk assessment steps is provided telow. 

Why 13 It "Good" to Characterize and Deal With Unoertalnty In Risk Assessment and In Other Quantitative Policy Analysis ... 

The book is divided into five sections, each dealing with specific topics of risk assessment. The first section deals with the most recent views on dermal absorption of chemicals through human skin and experimental methods and techniques on how to arrive at quantitative absorption data using animal models or in vitro systems. The diversity of methodology presented in this section reflects the quickly evolving state of the art in this held. 

In this paper, based on the grey system theory, a fuzzy comprehensive assessment model is established for overseas investment risk of mining enterprises, which provides a quantitative method of the assessment and study for the overseas investment risk of mining enterprises. This model can deal with the greyness and fuzziness properly in the assessment process and reduce the impact of human factors on the assessment results. At the same time, from the applied analysis on risks of Potash project in Canada invested by Yankuang... 

AS/NZS 4360 discusses different types of analysis, ranging from purely qualitative to purely quantitative ones. According to the Standard, the selection of the type of analysis should, amongst other, depend on the availability of numerical data and the proportionality of the time and effort needed for a fuller assessment. Unlike the AS/NZA 4360, Basel II is explicit about its preference for quantitative methods (for computing VaR). This difference can be attributed to the characteristics of the (financial) risks covered by Basel II while Basel II only deals with the financial sector, the AS/NZA 4360 Standard is supposed to fit a wide range of firms and industries. 

This chapter deals with flood risk analysis and assessment. The conceptual model source pathway receptor consequence for flood risk analysis is presented and its components are analyzed. The methodology to extract the predicted probability of coastal flooding from risk sources and pathways, as well as the expected damages from risk receptors axe introduced and examined. Reliability analysis of a coastal system is also briefly discussed. Quantitative methods to define acceptable flooding probabilities on the level of the protected area are presented. Tools such as cost-benefit analysis, utihty models, and the life quality index are introduced to define the tolerable risk of flooding. 

The design of aeronautics safety critical systems deals with two families of faults random faults of equipments and systematic faults in the development of the equipment, which include errors in the specification, design and coding of hardware and software. Two different approaches are used when assessing whether the risk associated with these two types of faults is acceptable. Qualitative requirements (minimal number of failures leading to a Failure Condition) and quantitative requirements (maximal probability of a Failure Condition occurrence) are associated with equipment faults whereas requirements stated in terms of Development Assurance Levels (DAL) are associated with development faults. 

The work described in this paper is preliminary. The most relevant related work seems to be the attack tree approach [5]. This approach proposes to use the classical fault tree notation in order to study security. As in our work, the attack tree contains basic events representing elementary threats. In some variants of the notation, the tree also include a description of the effect security barriers. In [7] the authors propose to use an extension of the fault-tree notation in order to deal with dynamic aspects of the threat propagation. Both of the previous works tend to focus on a quantitative assessment of security requirements whereas we have been working on qualitative requirements because this would be more consistent with the Airworthiness Safety process. Another relevant approach was proposed by the CORAS project [6], this notation aims at assisting the security risk analysis. A difference between this approach and our work is that the CORAS can be applied before the security architecture is designed whereas our approach is applied once the security architecture is established. 

The safe management of chemicals in the EU is based on the stepwise approach illustrated in Figure 23-3. In April 1996 a Technical Guidance Document was pub-lished to provide guidance on the risk assessment of both notified substances (as required under Commission Directive 93/67/EEC) and existing substances (under EC Regulation No. 1488/94) This guidance document deals with the risk assessment for human health and the environment, and covers also the use of (quantitative) structure-activity relationships. Of particular importance for the outcome of the risk assessment are the emission scenario documents, especially with respect to the default values, which will he applied if experimental data are not available. 

This overview of the capabilities of FFF coupled with ICP-MS has danonstrated that this hyphenated technique shows a great deal of promise to separate, detect, and quantitate nanoparticles in environmental matrices. FFF is a mature separation technique that has been used for more than 35 years, and when combined with detection techniques such as UV absorbance, has proved to be very capable of separating low concentrations of polydisperse particles. The recent coupling of ICP-MS with FFF has lowered its detection capability by more than 3 orders of magnitude and allowed for multielement detection, which is proving absolutely critical when carrying out environmental risk assessment studies of different engineered nanoparticles. 

---