Prophylaxis clinics

The immunorestorative potential of inosiplex has been evaluated in several clinical conditions, including post-surgical trauma, cancer patients with concurrent viral infections, and cancer patients receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapy. For example, most (84%) of the surgery patients remained immunologicaHy depressed, but 56% of the inosiplex-treated surgery patients had complete restoration of normal skin test reactivity (probability level < 0.0005). The use of inosiplex as an adjuvant to chemotherapy or radiotherapy appears to be valuable in the prophylaxis against opportunistic infections. 

The sulfas also remain clinically useful in the treatment of chancroid, lymphogranuloma venereum, trachoma, inclusion conjunctivitis, and the fungus-related nocardiosis (7). In combination with pyrimethamine, they are recommended for toxoplasmosis (8) and have been used for chloroquine-resistant falciparium malaria (4,9). There has also been some use of sulfas for the prophylaxis of rheumatic fever. The sulfone, dapsone, remains an accepted treatment for all forms of leprosy (4). 

Fondaparinux, the factor Xa-binding pentasaccharide (Arixtra, MW 1,728 Da), is prepared synthetically, unlike UFH, LMWH and danaparoid, which are obtained from animal sources. Despite only inactivating free factor Xa, clinical trials indicate that fondaparinux is an effective antithrombotic agent, both for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and treatment, as well as for acute coronary syndrome and ST elevation myocardial infarction [4]. 

Acetylsalicylic acid irreversibly inhibits both COX-1 and COX-2 by acetylating the enzymes. Since mature platelets lack a nucleus, they are unable to synthesise new enzyme. The anti-platelet effects of acetylsalicylic acid persist therefore throughout the lifetime of the platelet and the half-life of this effect is thus being much longer than the elimination half-life of acetylsalicylic acid (15 min). Since new platelets are continuously launched into the circulation, the clinically relevant anti-platelet effect of aspirin lasts for up to five days. This is the reason why low doses of acetylsalicylic acid (ca. 100 mg per day) are sufficient in the prophylaxis of heart attacks. 

The pretreatment of MH-susceptible patients with oral or intravenous dantrolene prior to surgery in order to avoid a crisis is controversial. Most physicians do not recommend prophylactic pretreatment except in patients who have had a previously documented episode. However, if pretreatment is desired, it is recommended that therapy be begun with intravenous dantrolene in a dose of 2 mg/Kg just prior to induction of anesthesia. This prevents the uncertainty of predictive blood values associated with the use of the oral route. The adverse effects of intravenous dantrolene prophylaxis include phlebitis and tissue necrosis. Patients who receive prophylactic treatment with oral dantrolene often complain of incapacitation, gastrointestinal irritation, prolonged drowsiness, and clinically significant respiratory muscle weakness. 

In the clinical setting, zanamivir 12 and oseltamivir 19 are effective in both the prevention and treatment of influenza A and B infection. Benefit in treatment is restricted to patients treated within 48 h of symptom onset (Fleming 2003). Importantly, the effects of drug treatment are a rednction in the severity of illness, and in the incidence of secondary complications. The term of illness is generally rednced between 1 and 2.5 days. The evalnation of zanamivir (Calfee and Hayden 1998 Oxford 2000 Fleming 2003), oseltamivir (Doncette and Aoki 2001 Oxford 2005) and peramivir (Sidwell and Smee 2002) for the treatment, and prophylaxis, of inflnenza virus infection has been reviewed. The reader is directed to these reviews for further details of drug pharmacodynamics and clinical trial data. 

Two neuraminidase inhibitors (oseltamivir carboxylate and zanamivir) are approved for prevention and treatment of infections with both influenza A and B viruses as discussed in chapter by Itzstein and Thomson, this volume. Oseltamivir carboxylate (OC) has gained most use because it can be taken orally, whereas the current formulation of zanamivir has to be inhaled. In addition, the WHO reconunends oseltamivir for treatment of clinically confirmed cases of H5N1 and for post-exposme prophylaxis to control recent H5N1 avian influenza outbreaks. 

Cookson JC, Sachs GS (1999). Lithium clinical use in mania and prophylaxis of affective disorders. In Buckley PF, Waddington JL, eds, Schizophrenia and Mood Disorders The New Drug Therapies in Clinical Practice. Oxford Butterworth Heinemann. 

Maj M, Pirozzi R, Magliano L, et al (1998). Longterm outcome of lithium prophylaxis in bipolar disorder 5-year prospective study of 402 patients a lithium clinic. Am J Psychiatry 155,30-5. 

Recommendations in this section may change based on the results from the recent EPO-3 trial (epoetin alfa versus placebo). A difference in red blood cell transfusion rates was not observed between groups. Epoetin alpha therapy improved survival in trauma patients. Epoetin alfa did not have a measurable clinical benefit in medical/surgical non-trauma patients. Epoetin alpha therapy was associated with an increased thrombotic event rate, particularly in patients not receiving pharmacological deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis. 

Given that VTE is often clinically silent and potentially fatal, strategies to increase the widespread use of prophylaxis have the greatest potential to improve patient outcomes. 

Alemtuzumab is the antibody to the CD52 receptor present on B and T lymphocytes. The pharmacokinetics of alemtuzumab demonstrate a terminal half-life of 7 days. Alemtuzumab has shown clinical activity in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Severe and prolonged (6 months) immunosuppression may result, which necessitates prophylaxis with cotrimox-azole and antivirals to prevent opportunistic infections. 

CNS prophylaxis is necessary in any treatment regimen for ALL At diagnosis, the incidence of CNS disease is less than 10%, but it increases to 50% to 75% after 1 year in patients without CNS prophylaxisA The justification for CNS prohylaxis is based on two clinical findings. First, many chemotherapeutic agents do not cross the blood-brain barrier easily. Second, the CNS is a frequent sanctuary for leukemia, and undetectable leukemic cells are present in the CNS in many patients at the time of diagnosis.6... 

---