Progress reports

R. N. McGiU and R. L. Graves, "Results from the Pederal Methanol Fleet, A Progress Report," 8th Int. Symp. on Alcohol Euels (Tokyo, Japan, Nov. 13-16,1988). 

Assessment of Costs and Benefits of Flexible and Alternative Fuel Use in the U.S. Transportation Sector, Progress Report One, DOE/PE-0080, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C., Jan. 1988. 

D. W. Brown and R. DuTeau, "Progress Report on the Long-Term Flow Testing of the HDR Reservoir at Fenton Hill, New Mexico", in Ref. 37. 

G. Y. Eastman, The Heat Pipe—A Progress Report, ST-4048, RCA Electronics Components, Lancaster, Pa., 1969. 

T. A. Orofino, Progress Report No. 549, Office of Saline Water Research and Development, U.S. Dept, of the Interior, Washington, D.C., May 1970. 

A. K. McMahan, Metallic Hydrogen Recent Theoretical Progress, report 1977, Lawrence Livermore Lab., University of California, Livermore, UCRL-79910,1977. 

R. H. Moore, U.S. Office Saline Water, Research and Development Progress Report, 651, 1971, 87 pp. 

Westinghouse Plutonium Fuels Demonstration Progress Report, Edison Electric Institute, ECAP-4167, Westinghouse Plutonium Fuels Development Laboratory, New York, 1970. 

Pesticide Reregistration Progress Report, Office of Pesticide Programs, EPA 738-R-94-031, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., Oct. 1994, 35 pp. 

B. L. SchuJman and P. A. White, "Pyrolysis of Scrap Tires Using the Tosco-11 Process— Progress Report," ACS Symposium Series No. 76, American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C., 1978. 

G. L. Brownell, "New Imaging Systems," iu Nuclear Medicine Technical Progress Report, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass., July 1, 1974-Apr. 1,1975. 

S. N. Rea, Texas Instruments Incorporated Monthly Technical Progress Report, No. 03-76-31, ERDA/JPL 954475-76-11, Texas Instmments, Dallas, May 1976. 

J. W. Kissel and K. E. Dufrane, The Bearing Properties of Zinc Gravity CastingAlloys, ILZRO Project ZM-298, Progress Report No. 2, International Lead Ziuc Research Organization, New York, 1980. 

Cool Water Coal Gasification Program," Fifth Progress Report, EPRINP-3931, Interim Report, Oct. 1988. 

Progress reports for sources not in comphance when the application is submitted... 

Progress on the action items should be documented in periodic progress reports to the review team leader or others assigned that functional responsibility. If no one is assigned the responsibihty of tracking this progress, completion of the action list wih probably be relegated to a lower priority and not be done. 

Review Follow-up Verification In addition to someone tracking the follow-up through progress reports, responsibility should be assigned to verify that any process changes were ac tuaUy made in the field. This verification can be done by a review team as part of a process pre-start-up review. It could also be part of the project team management responsibihty or assigned to a particular functional (i.e., safety and loss prevention) representative. The closure of the review process is complete once implementation is verified. 

It would not be unusual for some action plans to take a long time to complete. When extended implementation time is necessary, a follow-up mechanism should be used to document progress and show that an effort is being made to resolve the issues. Periodic (i.e., quarterly, semiannually) progress reports should be used as a follow-up method to ensure implementation. Future audits of the facility should include confirmation of the implementation of previous audit action plans. 

The final audit report, action plans, progress reports, and any closure report should be retained by the facility based on the facihty record retention pohcy. Typically, these items will be retained until future audit documentation replaces them. In some cases, audit records are retained for the life of the plant. 

Perkins, G.A., 1938, Weekly Progress Report, 3/15, Carbide and Carbon Chemical Co. 

Jackson, J. F. and M. G. Stevenson, Nuclear Reactor Safety Quarterly Progress Report. LANL, September 1979. 

According to Helander s unpublished data (Progress Report, Downward Projection of Heated Air, January 6, 1951, referenced by KoesteD ), Ki = 6. 

The management requirements are specified, such as points of contact, program plans, work breakdown structure, progress reporting, meetings, reviews, interfaces. 

R. L. Foye, Structural Composites, Quarterly Progress Report Numbers 1 and 2, AFML Contract Number AF 33(615)-5150, 1966. 

In modern materials science topics of high interest are surface structures on small (nanometer-length) scales and phase transitions in adsorbed surface layers. Many interesting effects appear at low temperatures, where quantum effects are important, which have to be taken into account in theoretical analyses. In this review a progress report is given on the state of the art of (quantum) simulations of adsorbed molecular layers. 

These progress reports will be circulated to facility managers for review, comment, and input at each stage, to assure that the end result fully reflects local concerns and capabilities. 

Consider taking minutes. Documentation ot team discussions and decisions can be very useful, both in keeping the team up to date and in providing the foundations for periodic progress reports. 

Regardless of the method selected, this exerdse should provide you and your team with a clear idea of where your company excels and where it needs woric, in terms of current PSM status. These results can be summarized in a concise progress report (see Figure 4-11 for an example). 

Progress Report from Process Safety Management Task Force... 

All effort expended in support of this project will be tracked by the Controller s office and reported to the Project Manager. Accumulated costs will be reported in monthly project team progress reports. An example is shown as Figure 5-14. 

What Is the Expected Output or Work Product. The specific form of the finished product will vaiy according to your company s practices and needs. However, it s reasonable to expect that the team s efforts will ultimately produce a set of documented Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for the management system, or their equivalent within your organization (see Section 6.3). Interim work products may include progress reports (see Chapter 8), documentation of discussions and analyses, flowcharts, or other materials. 

Facility Manager Ray Leonard is the task force s primary contact for the test. Ray is now assisting us with designing the pilot, and will be responsible for all communications, administration, and other management functions associated with its installation. He will provide weekly progress reports, and will be a strong contributor to the system review and refinement process once the test is complete. 

Progress report. Where we are today, compared with initial estimates and det ed plan. Use your original presentation (Chapter 2) and the implementation plan (Chapter 5) for comparison purposes, focusing on tasks, timetables, and resource requirements (prelected vs. revised vs. actual). 

---